Yamaha DGX-670 vs Roland FP-E50

Choosing the right digital piano can be challenging, especially when two models like the Yamaha DGX-670 and Roland FP-E50 stand out as top contenders in the mid-range market. Both pianos cater to beginners and intermediate players, offering a combination of realistic piano action, high-quality sounds, and modern features that enhance the playing experience. However, despite their similarities, each piano has its own strengths and weaknesses.

The Yamaha DGX-670 is part of Yamaha’s renowned DGX series, known for its versatility and powerful accompaniment features. With a wide range of voices, styles, and learning tools, it is an excellent option for players who want an all-in-one entertainment and practice instrument.

On the other hand, the Roland FP-E50 brings Roland’s well-regarded SuperNATURAL Piano technology into a compact and gig-friendly design. It is a stage-ready instrument with a focus on authentic piano sound, excellent key action, and a powerful arranger function, making it a great choice for those who want both realism and versatility.

But which one is the better option for you? Let’s break down their features and compare them in depth.

🎹Yamaha DGX-670 vs Roland FP-E50 Comparison Chart

If you click the links below, under the product images you will be redirected to Amazon.com. In case you then decide to buy anything, Amazon.com will pay me a commission. This doesn’t affect the honesty of this review in any way though.

Feature	Yamaha DGX-670	Roland FP-E50
	Check the best price on Amazon	Check the best price on Amazon
🎵 Sound Engine	Yamaha CFX Grand (Sample-Based) + Virtual Resonance Modeling (VRM)	SuperNATURAL Piano (Modeled) + ZEN-Core Synthesis
🎹 Key Action	Graded Hammer Standard (GHS)	PHA-4 Standard (Progressive Hammer Action)
🎼 Number of Sounds	630+ voices (including pianos, synths, strings, brass, etc.)	1016+ sounds (SuperNATURAL acoustic/electric pianos, ZEN-Core synths, orchestral instruments)
🎼 Polyphony	256 notes	256 notes
🔊 Speakers & Amplification	12W total (6W + 6W)	22W total (11W + 11W)
🎚️ Effects	Reverb (9 types), Chorus (5 types), DSP Effects, EQ, VRM (Virtual Resonance Modeling)	Reverb, Chorus, Delay, Compressor, Amp Modeling, Multi-Effects (MFX)
🎛️ Auto-Accompaniment	263 preset styles (fixed patterns)	AI-driven accompaniment (real-time chord recognition)
🎤 Microphone Input	❌ No	✅ Yes (with vocal effects: reverb, auto-tune, vocoder)
🎧 Headphone Output	✅ Yes (stereo)	✅ Yes (stereo)
🎼 Recording Features	16-track MIDI sequencer + USB audio recording	USB audio recording (no internal multi-track MIDI sequencer)
🔌 USB MIDI & Audio	✅ Yes (USB-to-Host, USB-to-Device)	✅ Yes (USB-to-Host, USB-to-Device)
📶 Bluetooth Audio	✅ Yes (Audio streaming only)	✅ Yes (Audio streaming)
📶 Bluetooth MIDI	❌ No	✅ Yes
🔊 External Outputs (For Live Performances)	❌ No dedicated line outputs	✅ Yes (stereo 1/4” line outs)
🎵 Layer & Split Mode	✅ Yes (Dual Layer & Split Mode)	✅ Yes (Dual Layer & Split Mode)
📱 App Integration	✅ Smart Pianist App	❌ No dedicated app
🎛️ Display	Full-color LCD screen	Small monochrome LCD screen
🎹 Pedal Compatibility	Single sustain pedal included, supports optional 3-pedal unit (LP-1)	Single sustain pedal included, supports additional expression pedals
⚖️ Weight	21.4 kg (47.2 lbs)	17.3 kg (38.1 lbs)
📏 Dimensions (W x D x H)	139.7 x 44.5 x 15.1 cm (55″ x 17.5″ x 5.9″)	129.1 x 28.4 x 12.7 cm (50.8″ x 11.2″ x 5″)
🔌 Aux Input (For External Audio Sources)	✅ Yes (3.5mm jack)	❌ No
🎤 Mic Effects (Reverb, Auto-Tune, Vocoder)	❌ No	✅ Yes
🔊 Best For	Home use, learning, auto-accompaniment, interactive features	Gigging, live performance, Bluetooth MIDI, singers, synth lovers
My individual reviews	Yamaha DGX-670 review	Roland FP-E50 review

🎯 Summary

• Yamaha DGX-670: Ideal for home players, learners, and those who enjoy accompaniment styles. Offers learning tools, a large LCD screen, and a great variety of voices.
• Roland FP-E50: Perfect for live performers, producers, and singer-songwriters. Features Bluetooth MIDI, mic input with effects, and high-quality piano modeling.

If you love interactive auto-accompaniment, learning features, and home play, go for the DGX-670.
If you perform live, need wireless MIDI, and want vocal effects, go for the FP-E50.

Design & Build Quality

Design and build quality are critical aspects when choosing a digital piano. While sound and playability are primary concerns, the physical construction and design impact how the instrument fits into your lifestyle, whether you’re using it for home practice, performances, or as a versatile music workstation.

The Yamaha DGX-670 and Roland FP-E50 have contrasting design philosophies—one leans toward an all-in-one, home-friendly digital piano, while the other embraces portability and a stage-piano aesthetic. Let’s take a detailed look at how their designs compare.

Yamaha DGX-670: A Console-Style Digital Piano with a Premium Feel

The Yamaha DGX-670 is designed with home use, entertainment, and versatility in mind. It is not just a stage piano—rather, it aims to be an all-in-one instrument with built-in speakers, a stand (optional), a full-sized keyboard, and a robust control interface.

1. Aesthetics & Materials

Yamaha has given the DGX-670 a sleek, professional look, available in both black and white finishes. The matte surface reduces glare and makes it fingerprint-resistant, which is a small but useful detail for those who care about aesthetics.

• The plastic casing is of high quality and feels sturdy, but it’s clear that Yamaha designed it for home use rather than frequent transportation.
• The LCD display and button layout contribute to a modern, high-tech appearance while keeping functionality accessible.
• The buttons and rotary dial feel solid and responsive, giving a premium touch to the user experience.

While the DGX-670 is not a high-end wooden digital piano like the Yamaha Clavinova series, it still presents itself as an elegant instrument that fits well into a living room, studio, or practice space.

2. Ergonomics & User Interface

The control panel is one of the biggest advantages of the DGX-670. Yamaha has given it a full-color LCD screen with an intuitive menu layout, making it easy for players to navigate through hundreds of voices, accompaniment styles, and effects.

• The large LCD screen is a standout feature that displays sheet music, settings, and tutorial guides.
• The buttons are well-spaced, allowing for easy navigation without feeling cluttered.
• The rotary dial enables quick selection of sounds, settings, and styles.

Compared to the Roland FP-E50, the DGX-670 feels more like a home workstation keyboard rather than a minimalist stage piano. This design choice makes it better suited for players who enjoy interactive features, learning tools, and auto-accompaniment styles.

3. Portability & Weight

While the DGX-670 is not a heavy-duty console digital piano, it is still larger and bulkier than the FP-E50, making it less portable.

• Weight: 21.4 kg (47.2 lbs)
• Dimensions: 139.7 cm (55″) width x 44.5 cm (17.5″) depth x 15.1 cm (5.9″) height

These dimensions make the DGX-670 somewhat portable, but it’s not ideal for musicians who need to frequently transport their instrument to gigs, rehearsals, or performances.

• If you plan to keep the DGX-670 in one place, its size is manageable.
• If you need a portable piano, this might not be the best option.

Yamaha does offer an optional stand (L-300) and three-pedal unit (LP-1), which makes it look even more like a full-sized console digital piano when set up at home.

4. Build Durability

Yamaha is known for producing durable instruments, and the DGX-670 is no exception. The keys, buttons, and casing all feel well-built, ensuring that the piano can withstand years of use.

However, due to its bulkier design and plastic body, it’s not as travel-friendly as a dedicated stage piano. If you need something rugged for frequent transport, the Roland FP-E50 might be a better choice.

Roland FP-E50: A Sleek, Portable Digital Piano for Stage & Studio

The Roland FP-E50 is built for portability and performance. Unlike the DGX-670, which aims to be an all-in-one home entertainment keyboard, the FP-E50 is designed with gigging musicians and stage performers in mind.

1. Aesthetics & Materials

Roland has taken a minimalist approach with the FP-E50, similar to other pianos in the FP series.

• The simple, modern design looks sleek and professional.
• The plastic chassis feels durable yet lightweight.
• The black finish is elegant but more prone to fingerprints and smudges than the DGX-670’s matte surface.

Overall, the FP-E50 has a clean, professional look that works well for both home and stage use.

2. Ergonomics & User Interface

Unlike the button-heavy interface of the DGX-670, the FP-E50 keeps things simple and stage-friendly.

• It features a small monochrome LCD screen instead of a full-color display.
• The buttons are fewer but well-placed, allowing for quick adjustments during live performances.
• It prioritizes hands-on control rather than menu-based navigation.

This makes the FP-E50 better suited for gigging musicians who need to focus on playing rather than navigating through complex settings.

3. Portability & Weight

One of the biggest advantages of the FP-E50 is its portability.

• Weight: 17.3 kg (38.1 lbs)
• Dimensions: 129.1 cm (50.8″) width x 28.4 cm (11.2″) depth x 12.7 cm (5″) height

This makes the FP-E50 significantly more portable than the DGX-670. If you’re a musician who needs to transport your piano frequently, the FP-E50 is the better choice.

• It fits easily into a car for travel.
• It is lighter, making it easier to carry.

4. Build Durability

Roland is known for making rugged and reliable instruments, and the FP-E50 follows this tradition.

• The keys, buttons, and casing all feel sturdy and well-constructed.
• It can handle frequent transport better than the DGX-670.
• The lighter design does not compromise on durability, making it a solid choice for gigging musicians.

Comparison: Which One Has Better Design & Build Quality?

Feature	Yamaha DGX-670	Roland FP-E50
Aesthetic	Modern home keyboard with workstation features	Sleek, minimalist stage piano
Materials	Sturdy plastic chassis, matte finish	Sturdy plastic, slightly glossier
User Interface	Full-color LCD, lots of buttons for deep control	Simple interface, fewer buttons, smaller screen
Weight	21.4 kg (heavier, less portable)	17.3 kg (lighter, more portable)
Best For	Home use, learning, accompaniment features	Gigging musicians, stage use

Final Verdict on Design & Build Quality

• If you want a versatile home keyboard with deep control features, choose the Yamaha DGX-670.
• If you need a compact, portable digital piano for live performance, go for the Roland FP-E50.

Both pianos are well-built, but they cater to different user needs. The DGX-670 is better for home users, while the FP-E50 is better for gigging musicians.

Keyboard & Action

One of the most critical aspects of a digital piano is its keyboard feel and action. This determines how closely it replicates the experience of playing an acoustic piano. While sound quality is important, an authentic and responsive key action is what truly defines a player’s experience.

Both the Yamaha DGX-670 and Roland FP-E50 feature fully weighted, 88-key keyboards, but they use different action mechanisms and technologies, leading to distinct playing experiences.

What Makes a Good Digital Piano Keyboard?

Before comparing these two models, let’s quickly break down what makes a great digital piano key action:

1. Weighted Keys – A good digital piano mimics the resistance of acoustic piano keys, using hammer-action mechanisms to replicate the feel.
2. Graded Weighting – Just like a real piano, lower keys should feel heavier, while higher keys should feel lighter.
3. Escapement Simulation – On grand pianos, when you press a key softly, you can feel a slight notch before the hammer releases—some digital pianos simulate this.
4. Key Material – Realistic digital pianos use textured, ivory-feel keys to enhance grip and prevent slipping.
5. Touch Sensitivity – A good keyboard should respond to subtle variations in dynamics, allowing for expressive playing.

With these factors in mind, let’s analyze the Yamaha DGX-670 and Roland FP-E50 in detail.

Yamaha DGX-670: Graded Hammer Standard (GHS) Action

The Yamaha DGX-670 features Yamaha’s Graded Hammer Standard (GHS) action, which is one of the most widely used entry-to-mid-level key actions found in Yamaha digital pianos.

1. Key Weighting & Response

The GHS action uses graded hammer weighting, meaning:

• The lower register (bass keys) feels heavier, requiring more force to press.
• The higher register (treble keys) feels lighter, just like an acoustic piano.

This mimics the weight distribution of a real grand piano, making it a solid choice for beginners and intermediate players.

2. Feel & Realism

While GHS is good for its price range, it is not as realistic as Yamaha’s higher-end actions like GH3 or NWX. Some limitations include:

• No escapement simulation, meaning advanced players may notice a lack of the subtle “notch” feel found in grand pianos.
• Keys feel slightly lighter than an acoustic piano, making it easier to play fast passages but less authentic in resistance.
• Springy return action—some players find that keys bounce back slightly quicker than in real pianos, which can affect legato and soft playing.

3. Key Material

The keys are made of plastic, with a matte finish on the black keys to provide a bit of grip. However:

• There is no synthetic ivory or ebony texture, meaning the keys feel smooth and slightly slippery compared to higher-end models.
• This might not be an issue for beginners, but intermediate players may miss the textured keytops found on more expensive digital pianos.

4. Touch Sensitivity & Expressiveness

The DGX-670 offers adjustable touch sensitivity, allowing players to customize how the keyboard responds to dynamics.

• Four sensitivity settings: Soft, Medium, Hard, Fixed.
• The response is good for expressive playing, but it doesn’t match the detailed response of Yamaha’s higher-end actions.

5. Overall Impression

The GHS action is a solid entry-level key action, especially for those transitioning from a beginner keyboard to a weighted digital piano. However:

• Intermediate players may find it lacking in realism.
• It’s best for home use and practice but not ideal for serious classical performance.
• Good for learning, but those who need a more expressive, nuanced touch should consider higher-end Yamaha actions.

Roland FP-E50: PHA-4 Standard Key Action

The Roland FP-E50 features Roland’s PHA-4 Standard key action, which is widely regarded as superior to Yamaha’s GHS in terms of realism, feel, and response.

1. Key Weighting & Response

The PHA-4 Standard action uses progressive hammer weighting, similar to Yamaha’s GHS:

• Lower keys are heavier and higher keys are lighter, replicating a real grand piano.
• However, the overall resistance feels more realistic compared to GHS.
• It features escapement simulation, adding a subtle notch feel when pressing keys lightly, mimicking the mechanics of a grand piano.

2. Feel & Realism

Compared to Yamaha’s GHS, the PHA-4 offers more realistic weighting and response.

• The keys return more naturally, making legato passages smoother and more fluid.
• The escapement feature adds depth, making it feel closer to a real acoustic piano.
• It allows for better dynamic control, which is useful for jazz, classical, and expressive playing.

3. Key Material

The keys on the FP-E50 are made of plastic, but they feature Roland’s signature synthetic ivory and ebony texture.

• This makes them grippier and more comfortable to play, especially for extended sessions.
• The textured surface absorbs moisture, preventing fingers from slipping.
• Feels closer to high-end digital pianos, despite being a mid-range model.

4. Touch Sensitivity & Expressiveness

The PHA-4 Standard has highly responsive touch sensitivity, with adjustable settings that allow for precise control over dynamics.

• It captures subtle nuances better than the GHS action.
• Great for expressive pianists who want refined control over soft and loud passages.
• Allows for better dynamic range, making it better for classical, jazz, and expressive genres.

5. Overall Impression

The PHA-4 Standard action is clearly superior to Yamaha’s GHS in almost every aspect.

• It offers a more realistic feel, better control over dynamics, and textured keys for improved grip.
• Escapement simulation adds realism, which is missing on the DGX-670.
• Best choice for players who prioritize authentic key feel.

Comparison Table: Yamaha DGX-670 vs. Roland FP-E50 Key Action

Feature	Yamaha DGX-670 (GHS)	Roland FP-E50 (PHA-4 Standard)
Weighted Action	Graded Hammer Standard (GHS)	Progressive Hammer Action (PHA-4)
Escapement Simulation	❌ No	✅ Yes
Key Material	Plastic, matte black keys	Synthetic ivory & ebony texture
Realism	Decent for beginners	Closer to an acoustic piano
Touch Sensitivity	4 levels (Soft, Medium, Hard, Fixed)	Adjustable, highly expressive
Best For	Beginners, casual players	Intermediate & serious players

Final Verdict: Which Has the Better Key Action?

✅ The Roland FP-E50 is the clear winner in terms of keyboard action.

• PHA-4 Standard offers superior feel, escapement simulation, and textured keys.
• GHS is still good, but it feels lighter and less responsive than Roland’s action.
• If key feel is your top priority, choose the FP-E50.
• If you prioritize other features like auto-accompaniment, the DGX-670 is still a great choice.

For serious piano players who want the most realistic key feel, the Roland FP-E50 is the better investment. 🎹🔥

Sound Quality & Engine

Sound quality is arguably the most important aspect of a digital piano. No matter how good the key action is, if the sound doesn’t inspire you, the playing experience will feel lackluster.

Both the Yamaha DGX-670 and Roland FP-E50 feature highly advanced sound engines, designed to capture the depth, richness, and nuances of an acoustic piano while offering a wide selection of additional instrument voices. However, the way each piano generates and processes sound is quite different.

In this section, we’ll break down:

• The core sound engines used by Yamaha and Roland.
• The piano tone realism and expressiveness of each instrument.
• The variety of additional sounds and effects.
• How each piano handles polyphony and layering.

Let’s begin by examining how these two pianos produce their core sounds.

Yamaha DGX-670: CFX Grand Piano Sound Engine

Yamaha has equipped the DGX-670 with its flagship CFX sound engine, which is based on a multi-layered sampling of the Yamaha CFX 9’ concert grand piano.

1. Sampling vs. Modeling: How Yamaha Generates Sound

The DGX-670 primarily relies on sample-based sound generation.

• This means that Yamaha records (samples) the actual sound of a real grand piano at various velocities and articulations.
• These high-resolution samples are then played back when you press a key.
• Because Yamaha captures multiple layers of the CFX concert grand, the result is a deep, dynamic, and highly realistic piano tone.

Yamaha also adds Virtual Resonance Modeling (VRM), which simulates:

• String resonance (when vibrations from one note affect surrounding strings).
• Damper resonance (how the pedal affects overall sustain).
• Key-off resonance (the subtle change in tone when you release a key).

These elements add depth and realism to the sound, making it feel more like an acoustic piano.

2. Core Piano Sound & Expressiveness

The Yamaha CFX grand sound in the DGX-670 is rich, bright, and well-defined, especially in the mid and treble registers.

• The bass frequencies are deep but not overly resonant, making it ideal for classical, pop, and jazz.
• The highs have clarity, allowing for articulate melody lines.
• Dynamic response is excellent, especially when paired with touch sensitivity settings.

However, some limitations exist:

• Since it uses sample-based playback, some notes may sound slightly static compared to modeled pianos.
• Sudden changes in dynamics (e.g., pianissimo to forte) might not be as seamless as in a physically modeled engine.

Despite this, the CFX engine is among the best in this price range, delivering a fantastic grand piano tone.

3. Additional Sounds & Instruments

The DGX-670 is not just a piano—it is a versatile arranger keyboard with over 630 instrument voices, including:

• Electric pianos (Rhodes, Wurlitzer, DX7-style FM pianos).
• Organs, strings, brass, and synths.
• Acoustic and electric guitars.
• Orchestral instruments like flutes, clarinets, and violins.
• Drums and percussion kits.

The breadth of sounds makes it a fantastic all-in-one instrument for players who like variety. However, not all sounds are equally detailed—while the piano and orchestral instruments sound superb, some synth and guitar patches feel slightly artificial compared to Roland’s ZEN-Core engine.

4. Polyphony & Layering

• Polyphony: 256 notes (excellent for complex pieces).
• Dual Mode: Layer two voices together.
• Split Mode: Assign different sounds to left and right hands.

With 256-note polyphony, you can play dense classical pieces, layered sounds, and accompaniment styles without any notes cutting off.

Roland FP-E50: SuperNATURAL Piano & ZEN-Core Engine

The Roland FP-E50 uses a dual-engine approach, combining:

1. SuperNATURAL Piano Modeling (for acoustic piano sounds).
2. ZEN-Core Synthesis (for everything else—synths, guitars, strings, etc.).

1. SuperNATURAL vs. Sample-Based Pianos

Unlike Yamaha’s sample-based approach, Roland’s SuperNATURAL engine uses a mix of sampling and modeling to create a more dynamic, organic piano sound.

• Instead of playing back static recordings, the FP-E50 dynamically models aspects of an acoustic piano in real-time.
• This allows for smoother velocity transitions and a more natural response when playing softly or forcefully.

2. Core Piano Sound & Expressiveness

The SuperNATURAL grand piano sound in the FP-E50 has a warm, resonant tone, with:

• Deep, rich bass that feels more “alive” than Yamaha’s sampled bass.
• Expressive dynamics that make it more responsive to touch.
• Mellow, rounded highs that suit jazz and soft ballads beautifully.

Overall, the FP-E50’s piano tone feels more organic, making it ideal for expressive, emotion-driven performances.

3. Additional Sounds & Instruments (ZEN-Core Engine)

Roland’s ZEN-Core sound engine powers over 1000 additional instrument tones, including:

• Synthesizers (Juno, Jupiter, classic Roland synths).
• Orchestral sounds (strings, brass, choirs, etc.).
• Electric pianos and organs.
• Guitars, bass, world instruments.
• Drums and rhythm kits.

The ZEN-Core engine gives Roland a major advantage in modern music styles, offering better synths, pads, and EDM sounds compared to Yamaha’s DGX-670.

4. Polyphony & Layering

• Polyphony: 256 notes (same as Yamaha).
• Dual Mode: Layer two sounds.
• Split Mode: Assign different sounds to each hand.

With 256-note polyphony, the FP-E50 can handle complex performances without note dropouts.

Comparison: Yamaha DGX-670 vs. Roland FP-E50 Sound Engine

Feature	Yamaha DGX-670	Roland FP-E50
Piano Sound Engine	CFX Grand Sample-Based	SuperNATURAL Modeled
Piano Sound Character	Bright, clear, rich mids	Warm, organic, deep bass
Resonance Modeling	Virtual Resonance Modeling (VRM)	Full resonance modeling
Additional Sounds	630+ voices	1000+ voices (ZEN-Core)
Best For	Classical, pop, home use	Expressive players, live performance

Final Verdict: Which One Has the Better Sound Engine?

✅ If you want a bright, crisp grand piano tone with strong accompaniment features, the Yamaha DGX-670 is the better choice.
✅ If you prefer a more organic, dynamic piano sound with better synths and modern tones, the Roland FP-E50 wins.

Both pianos sound fantastic, but the FP-E50 feels more “alive” due to its modeling engine, while the DGX-670 offers a more polished, studio-quality sampled tone.

Speakers & Amplification

A digital piano’s built-in speaker system plays a crucial role in delivering a satisfying playing experience. While headphones or external speakers can enhance sound quality, a powerful and well-balanced built-in speaker system ensures that you can enjoy rich, dynamic sound right out of the box.

The Yamaha DGX-670 and Roland FP-E50 both come with built-in stereo speaker systems, but they differ significantly in design, power, and sound projection.

Why Are Speakers Important in a Digital Piano?

When evaluating a digital piano’s speaker system, there are several factors to consider:

1. Speaker Configuration – How many speakers does the piano have, and are they optimized for different frequency ranges (e.g., tweeters for high frequencies, woofers for bass)?
2. Power Output (Wattage) – Higher wattage means louder, clearer sound with better projection.
3. Stereo Imaging – Does the sound feel realistic and spacious, or is it overly centered?
4. Bass Response – Can the speakers produce deep, warm bass, or do lower frequencies sound weak?
5. Sound Clarity – Are the highs crisp and the mids well-defined, or does the sound feel muddy?

Let’s analyze how the DGX-670 and FP-E50 perform in these areas.

Yamaha DGX-670: A Rich, Balanced Home Speaker System

The Yamaha DGX-670 is designed primarily for home use, and its speaker system reflects that. It features:

• Speaker Configuration: 2-way stereo system with two main speakers (woofers) and two tweeters.
• Speaker Size: 12 cm (woofers) + 5 cm (tweeters).
• Amplifier Power: 6W + 6W (total 12W output).

1. Sound Balance & Clarity

Because the DGX-670 has separate tweeters and woofers, it delivers a well-balanced sound across all frequencies.

• Bass frequencies sound warm and full, thanks to the dedicated 12 cm woofers.
• Mids and highs remain clear and well-defined, without distortion.
• The stereo imaging is excellent, creating a wide, immersive soundstage.

The addition of tweeters is a big advantage, as they help produce clear high frequencies (important for instruments like violins, flutes, and synth pads).

2. Volume & Projection

• With 6W per speaker, the DGX-670 is loud enough for home practice and small gatherings.
• However, for larger spaces or performances, external amplification may be needed.

3. Special Sound Enhancements

Yamaha has integrated several DSP-based enhancements into the DGX-670’s speaker system:

• Intelligent Acoustic Control (IAC): Automatically adjusts bass and treble balance to ensure clarity at low volume levels.
• Stereophonic Optimizer: Creates a more natural soundscape when using headphones, simulating the feel of playing an acoustic piano in a room.

These features ensure that the DGX-670 delivers consistently great sound whether you’re playing softly or at full volume.

Overall Impression

• ✅ Pros: Clear, well-balanced sound; strong bass; dedicated tweeters; stereo imaging is excellent.
• ❌ Cons: 12W total power is not very loud for performances; may need external speakers for larger settings.

Roland FP-E50: Powerful and Stage-Ready Sound

Unlike the DGX-670, which is optimized for home use, the Roland FP-E50 is designed with live performance in mind. This is reflected in its stronger, more powerful speaker system.

• Speaker Configuration: Full-range stereo speaker system (no separate tweeters).
• Speaker Size: 12 cm x 2 (stereo pair).
• Amplifier Power: 11W + 11W (total 22W output).

1. Sound Balance & Clarity

• The FP-E50’s speakers are louder and more powerful than the DGX-670’s (22W vs. 12W).
• Bass is strong and resonant, with great depth—ideal for pop, rock, and jazz.
• However, because there are no dedicated tweeters, the high frequencies are slightly less refined compared to the DGX-670.

2. Volume & Projection

• With 11W per speaker, the FP-E50 can fill a room more easily than the DGX-670.
• It is better suited for rehearsals, gigs, and public performances.
• Even at high volume levels, there’s little distortion, making it ideal for live playing.

3. Special Sound Enhancements

While the FP-E50 doesn’t have as many home-friendly sound processing features as the DGX-670, it does offer:

• Sound projection technology that enhances stereo spread, making the piano sound bigger than it actually is.
• Optimized EQ settings that allow for custom sound shaping, particularly useful for performers.

Overall Impression

• ✅ Pros: Louder and more powerful (22W output); strong bass response; ideal for live performances.
• ❌ Cons: Lacks dedicated tweeters, making the highs slightly less crisp than the DGX-670; less sound processing for home use.

Comparison: Yamaha DGX-670 vs. Roland FP-E50 Speaker System

Feature	Yamaha DGX-670	Roland FP-E50
Speaker Configuration	2-way system (woofers + tweeters)	Full-range stereo
Speaker Size	12 cm x 2 (woofers) + 5 cm x 2 (tweeters)	12 cm x 2
Total Power Output	12W (6W + 6W)	22W (11W + 11W)
Bass Response	Warm but not overly powerful	Deep, punchy, better for live performance
High Frequency Clarity	Crisp and well-defined (thanks to tweeters)	Good, but slightly less detailed highs
Best For	Home practice, balanced sound	Gigging musicians, louder venues

Final Verdict: Which One Has the Better Speakers?

✅ Choose the Yamaha DGX-670 if:

• You want a balanced sound system with clear highs and strong mids.
• You primarily play at home and need a natural, immersive listening experience.
• You use headphones frequently (Stereophonic Optimizer improves headphone sound).

✅ Choose the Roland FP-E50 if:

• You need louder speakers for performances or rehearsals.
• You want stronger bass response.
• You don’t mind slightly less refined high frequencies in exchange for more power and projection.

Both pianos have good speakers, but they cater to different user needs—the DGX-670 excels in clarity, while the FP-E50 wins in volume and stage presence.

Features & Functions

While keyboard feel and sound quality define the core playing experience, the features and functions of a digital piano determine how versatile and interactive it is.

Both the Yamaha DGX-670 and Roland FP-E50 are more than just digital pianos—they are multifunctional instruments with auto-accompaniment, recording tools, effects, and connectivity options. However, they cater to different types of players, with Yamaha leaning towards learning and entertainment and Roland focusing on live performance and flexibility.

Let’s take a detailed look at what each model offers.

Yamaha DGX-670: A Feature-Packed Digital Piano for Learning & Entertainment

The Yamaha DGX-670 is a hybrid digital piano and arranger keyboard, designed for beginners, intermediate players, and home musicians who want learning tools, auto-accompaniment, and an extensive sound library.

1. Auto-Accompaniment & Styles

One of the DGX-670’s biggest advantages is its arranger-style accompaniment system, which allows players to create a full-band experience with interactive backing tracks.

• 263 preset accompaniment styles (pop, jazz, classical, Latin, EDM, etc.).
• Smart Chord & Adaptive Style: Automatically harmonizes and adjusts the accompaniment to your playing.
• One-Touch Settings (OTS): Pre-programmed sounds and effects for each style.

This system is ideal for solo performers who want a full-band feel without extra musicians.

2. Learning & Practice Features

Yamaha has packed the DGX-670 with several educational tools to help beginners and intermediate players develop their skills.

• Score Display: Shows sheet music on the LCD screen.
• Lesson Mode: Step-by-step guidance for learning songs.
• Chord Tutor: Helps beginners understand chord progressions.
• Smart Pianist App Compatibility: Provides interactive tutorials.

For learners, these tools make the DGX-670 a fantastic educational instrument.

3. Effects & Sound Customization

The DGX-670 offers an extensive selection of built-in effects, including:

• Reverb (9 types) – Simulates different room acoustics.
• Chorus (5 types) – Adds depth and richness.
• DSP Effects (over 200 presets) – Includes amp simulators, EQ, and modulation effects.
• Virtual Resonance Modeling (VRM) – Enhances realism by simulating piano resonance.

The ability to customize sound through these effects makes the DGX-670 feel like a professional workstation keyboard.

4. Recording & Playback

• MIDI Recorder (16-track sequencer) – Allows multi-layered recordings.
• Audio Recorder (WAV format) – Direct recording to USB.
• Playback Options – Supports MIDI and audio files, making it great for backing tracks.

This makes the DGX-670 suitable for home recording and songwriting.

5. Display & Interface

The full-color LCD screen is a significant advantage over the Roland FP-E50’s smaller screen.

• Displays lyrics, notation, and settings.
• Helps with easy navigation of voices and styles.

Roland FP-E50: A Stage-Ready Digital Piano with Advanced Sound Design

The Roland FP-E50 is built more for performance-oriented players, featuring high-quality piano sounds, synth capabilities, and live performance tools.

1. SuperNATURAL Accompaniment & AI-Based Styles

While the FP-E50 also offers auto-accompaniment, it is AI-driven, meaning:

• The accompaniment adapts dynamically to your playing, rather than following fixed style patterns.
• It feels more fluid and natural, ideal for live performances.
• Fewer pre-programmed styles (compared to Yamaha), but more intelligent response.

This makes it great for musicians who like flexibility in accompaniment.

2. Performance Features & Live Controls

Unlike the DGX-670, the FP-E50 is designed for stage performances, offering:

• One-touch sound switching (great for quick changes during a gig).
• Hands-free pedal assignments (control effects or accompaniment with foot pedals).
• Vocal effects processing, including auto-tune and reverb for singers.

If you’re a gigging musician, the FP-E50’s focus on performance tools makes it more stage-friendly than the DGX-670.

3. Sound Customization & Effects

• ZEN-Core Engine – Allows for deep synthesis and sound layering.
• Effects Include:
  • Chorus, reverb, delay, compressor, EQ, and amp modeling.
  • Multi-effects (MFX) for synth programming.

Compared to the DGX-670, the FP-E50 provides deeper sound customization, especially for synth and electronic sounds.

4. Recording & Playback

• USB Audio/MIDI Interface – Directly connects to DAWs.
• Audio Recorder – Records performances as high-quality WAV files.
• No internal multitrack MIDI sequencer like the DGX-670.

This makes the FP-E50 better suited for DAW recording, but less ideal for standalone multi-track recording.

5. Display & Interface

Unlike the DGX-670’s full-color LCD screen, the FP-E50 has a small monochrome screen, making it less visually detailed.

• Menu navigation is simpler but less intuitive.
• Better for quick live adjustments, but not as comprehensive for deep settings.

Comparison: Features & Functions

Feature	Yamaha DGX-670	Roland FP-E50
Auto-Accompaniment	263 styles (fixed patterns)	AI-driven accompaniment
Learning Features	Yes (Lesson Mode, Score Display, Chord Tutor)	No dedicated learning tools
Effects & Sound Customization	Reverb, Chorus, DSP, VRM	Reverb, Chorus, Delay, Compressor, Amp Modeling
Synth & Modern Sounds	Limited	Extensive (ZEN-Core engine)
Recording Features	16-track MIDI + Audio Recorder	USB Audio/MIDI Recorder
Vocal Processing	No	Yes (auto-tune, reverb, vocoder)
Display & Interface	Full-color LCD screen	Small monochrome screen
Best For	Home players, learners, accompaniment users	Performers, singers, synth users

Final Verdict: Which Has the Better Features & Functions?

✅ Choose the Yamaha DGX-670 if:

• You want interactive learning tools and sheet music display.
• You need rich auto-accompaniment with fixed styles.
• You prefer deep recording features (16-track MIDI sequencer).

✅ Choose the Roland FP-E50 if:

• You want a gig-ready keyboard with AI-driven accompaniment.
• You need advanced synth sounds and vocal effects.
• You prefer live performance tools over built-in learning features.

Final Thoughts

• For home practice, composing, and interactive learning, the DGX-670 wins.
• For stage use, synth customization, and vocal performance, the FP-E50 is the better choice.

Both pianos are feature-rich, but they cater to different musicians. If you’re a home player, go for the DGX-670. If you’re a performer, choose the FP-E50.

Connectivity & Integration

Why Connectivity Matters in a Digital Piano

In today’s digital music world, a modern piano’s connectivity and integration capabilities are just as important as its sound and key action. Whether you’re a home player, a performer, or a music producer, being able to connect your digital piano to external devices can significantly expand its functionality.

A well-connected digital piano allows you to:

• Use it as a MIDI controller for DAWs (Digital Audio Workstations).
• Record performances directly to a computer.
• Use Bluetooth for wireless audio streaming.
• Connect pedals, headphones, microphones, and amplifiers.

Both the Yamaha DGX-670 and Roland FP-E50 offer solid connectivity features, but they differ in wireless functionality, MIDI capabilities, and external integration.

Let’s analyze their ports, wireless features, and overall connectivity potential.

Yamaha DGX-670: A Feature-Rich Home Studio & Learning Keyboard

The Yamaha DGX-670 is designed with home players, students, and casual composers in mind. It includes a wide range of connectivity options, making it a versatile keyboard for both beginners and advanced musicians.

1. USB & MIDI Connectivity

• USB-to-Host (MIDI & Audio): This allows the DGX-670 to be connected to a computer or mobile device, enabling:
  • MIDI transmission (sending and receiving MIDI data).
  • Digital audio streaming, allowing the piano to send high-quality audio directly to a DAW without needing an external audio interface.
• USB-to-Device: Supports USB flash drives for saving performances, MIDI recordings, and settings.

What does this mean for musicians?

• You can use the DGX-670 as a MIDI controller for software instruments in programs like GarageBand, Logic Pro, Ableton Live, and FL Studio.
• You can record performances digitally without extra cables or interfaces.
• It’s plug-and-play for most DAWs, making it easy for beginners.

However, one notable limitation:
❌ No Bluetooth MIDI – Unlike the Roland FP-E50, you must use a USB cable for MIDI connections.

2. Bluetooth & Wireless Capabilities

• ✅ Bluetooth Audio (Receive Only): You can stream music from a phone/tablet to the DGX-670 speakers.
• ❌ No Bluetooth MIDI: You cannot send or receive MIDI data wirelessly.

While Bluetooth Audio is great for playing along with songs, the lack of Bluetooth MIDI means you’ll need a USB cable for wireless MIDI applications.

3. External Audio & Pedal Connections

• Headphone Output – Standard stereo output for quiet practice.
• Aux In (3.5mm jack) – Allows you to connect an external device (smartphone, laptop, etc.) and play music through the DGX-670 speakers.
• Pedal Inputs – Supports both:
  • A single sustain pedal (included).
  • An optional 3-pedal unit (LP-1), which replicates the full sustain, sostenuto, and soft pedals of an acoustic piano.

❌ No Mic Input – Unlike the Roland FP-E50, the DGX-670 does not support a direct microphone connection.

4. App Integration & Smart Pianist Compatibility

The DGX-670 integrates with Yamaha’s Smart Pianist App, allowing for:

• Visual chord analysis from audio tracks.
• Digital score display on a tablet.
• Tone and effect customization via touchscreen interface.

This makes it a great tool for learners and songwriters.

Overall Connectivity Rating for Yamaha DGX-670

✅ Strengths:

• USB MIDI & Audio (no need for an external interface).
• Bluetooth Audio for playback.
• Smart Pianist App integration for learning and control.

❌ Weaknesses:

• No Bluetooth MIDI (wired connection required).
• No microphone input or vocal effects.

Roland FP-E50: A Performance-Ready Keyboard with Bluetooth MIDI

Unlike the DGX-670, which is designed more for home and learning use, the Roland FP-E50 is aimed at gigging musicians, songwriters, and performers.

1. USB & MIDI Connectivity

• USB-to-Host (MIDI & Audio):
  • Works as a MIDI controller for DAWs.
  • Supports high-quality audio recording directly via USB.
• USB-to-Device: For saving performances and settings to a flash drive.

💡 Big Advantage:
✅ Bluetooth MIDI – Allows for wireless MIDI transmission, making it much easier to:

• Connect to a tablet, computer, or smartphone without a cable.
• Use music apps like GarageBand, Synthesia, or Roland’s Zenology.

This makes the FP-E50 better suited for mobile musicians and modern music production setups.

2. Bluetooth & Wireless Capabilities

• ✅ Bluetooth Audio (Receive Only) – Just like the DGX-670, you can stream music to the FP-E50 speakers.
• ✅ Bluetooth MIDI (Wireless DAW Control) – Unlike the DGX-670, you can send and receive MIDI wirelessly.

💡 Why This Matters:

• You can use wireless MIDI apps without needing extra cables.
• It allows for a cleaner, cable-free setup.

3. External Audio, Mic, & Pedal Connections

• Headphone Output – Standard stereo jack for private practice.
• Mic Input (with vocal effects!) – The FP-E50 has a dedicated microphone input, allowing singers to:
  • Apply reverb, auto-tune, and vocoder effects in real time.
  • Perform live without needing an external mixer.
• Line Out (Stereo 1/4” Jacks) – Unlike the DGX-670, the FP-E50 has dedicated stereo outputs, making it easy to connect to PA systems or amplifiers for live gigs.
• Pedal Inputs – Supports:
  • A single sustain pedal (included).
  • Additional expression pedals for dynamic control.

🎤 For singers and live performers, the FP-E50’s microphone input is a game-changer.

Overall Connectivity Rating for Roland FP-E50

✅ Strengths:

• Bluetooth MIDI (wireless DAW & app control).
• Dedicated mic input with vocal effects.
• Balanced stereo outputs for live performances.

❌ Weaknesses:

• No Smart Pianist App compatibility (less learning-focused).

Comparison: Yamaha DGX-670 vs. Roland FP-E50 Connectivity

Feature	Yamaha DGX-670	Roland FP-E50
USB MIDI & Audio	✅ Yes	✅ Yes
Bluetooth Audio	✅ Yes	✅ Yes
Bluetooth MIDI	❌ No	✅ Yes
Headphone Output	✅ Yes	✅ Yes
Aux In	✅ Yes	❌ No
Mic Input	❌ No	✅ Yes (with effects)
Line Out for PA Systems	❌ No	✅ Yes
Best For	Home players, learners	Performers, singers, producers

Final Verdict: Which One Has Better Connectivity?

✅ Choose the Yamaha DGX-670 if:

• You want Smart Pianist App integration.
• You need USB audio recording for home use.

✅ Choose the Roland FP-E50 if:

• You need Bluetooth MIDI for wireless integration.
• You sing and want a built-in mic input with effects.
• You perform live and need dedicated outputs for PA systems.

Both pianos offer great connectivity, but the FP-E50 is the better choice for performers and producers, while the DGX-670 excels in home learning and composing setups.

Value for Money

When purchasing a digital piano, value for money is one of the most important factors to consider. While features, sound, and key action matter, the ultimate question is: Are you getting the best possible instrument for what you pay?

The Yamaha DGX-670 and Roland FP-E50 are similarly priced, generally ranging between $800 and $950, depending on the retailer and additional accessories. However, their value depends on your specific needs as a musician.

In this section, we’ll evaluate:

• Pricing & affordability
• Features vs. cost
• Longevity & upgrade potential
• Who gets the most value from each model

1. Pricing Comparison: How Much Do They Cost?

As of today, the average prices are:

• Yamaha DGX-670 → $850 – $950 (without stand and pedals).
• Roland FP-E50 → $800 – $950 (without stand).

💡 Key Pricing Notes:

• The Yamaha DGX-670 requires an optional stand and pedal unit, which adds around $150 – $200 to the total cost.
• The Roland FP-E50’s price includes more live performance features, but a stand and expression pedals are sold separately.
• Both models are in the same price range, so the decision comes down to which features are more valuable to you.

2. Feature-to-Price Ratio: What Do You Get for Your Money?

At around $850-$950, both keyboards offer a strong mix of digital piano and workstation features, but they excel in different areas.

✅ Yamaha DGX-670: Best Value for Learning & Home Use

If you’re a beginner or intermediate player, the DGX-670 offers tremendous value because it includes:

• A high-quality CFX grand piano sound from Yamaha’s premium line.
• Hundreds of built-in accompaniment styles, great for solo performers.
• A full-color LCD screen, making navigation easier.
• Learning features like Score Display, Chord Tutor, and Smart Pianist app integration.

💰 Biggest Strengths for the Price:

• Great for learning and casual playing.
• Tons of built-in features without needing extra software.
• Works well as an arranger keyboard, making it fun and interactive.

❌ Potential Downsides for the Price:

• No Bluetooth MIDI, requiring a wired connection for DAWs.
• Limited as a performance keyboard (not designed for live stage use).
• No dedicated mic input for singers.

✅ Roland FP-E50: Best Value for Gigging & Versatile Sound Design

For performers and producers, the FP-E50 is a better long-term investment because it includes:

• SuperNATURAL modeling for a more organic, expressive piano sound.
• ZEN-Core sound engine, offering over 1000 synth and modern instrument tones.
• Bluetooth MIDI, allowing for wireless DAW integration.
• A microphone input with vocal effects, making it ideal for singers.
• Dedicated stereo outputs for connecting to a PA system.

💰 Biggest Strengths for the Price:

• Great for stage and live performance.
• Bluetooth MIDI means fewer cables for recording.
• Expandable sound library (ZEN-Core gives you endless possibilities).

❌ Potential Downsides for the Price:

• No built-in learning tools like Yamaha’s Score Display or Chord Tutor.
• Fewer fixed accompaniment styles (AI-driven accompaniment is more flexible, but less beginner-friendly).
• Smaller LCD screen (not as user-friendly as Yamaha’s interface).

3. Longevity & Upgrade Potential

When investing in a digital piano, you should consider how long it will remain useful before you feel the need to upgrade.

🔵 Yamaha DGX-670: Best for Long-Term Home Use

• If you’re primarily playing at home and want a keyboard that will stay relevant for years, the DGX-670 will last a long time.
• Its arranger features, large sound library, and learning tools mean it won’t feel outdated quickly.
• However, if you eventually start performing live or recording more seriously, you may feel the need to upgrade to a higher-end stage piano.

🔴 Roland FP-E50: Best for Long-Term Performance & Production

• Because of its SuperNATURAL piano engine and expandable sound options, the FP-E50 is future-proof for performers and producers.
• Bluetooth MIDI and PA system compatibility mean you won’t outgrow it easily.
• However, if you’re primarily a home player, you might not use its advanced live features, making some of its value less relevant to you.

4. Who Gets the Most Value from Each Model?

Player Type	Best Choice	Why?
Beginners & Learners	🎹 Yamaha DGX-670	Learning tools, Score Display, chord guidance, Smart Pianist app.
Home Players & Hobbyists	🎹 Yamaha DGX-670	Fun accompaniment styles, versatile sounds, intuitive interface.
Performers & Gigging Musicians	🎤 Roland FP-E50	Powerful stage features, vocal effects, Bluetooth MIDI, stereo outputs.
Composers & Producers	🎛 Roland FP-E50	ZEN-Core synth engine, wireless MIDI, direct PA system output.
Singer-Songwriters	🎤 Roland FP-E50	Microphone input with vocal effects (auto-tune, vocoder, reverb).
Classical & Jazz Pianists	🎹 Roland FP-E50	SuperNATURAL piano modeling, responsive key action.

If you want a digital piano for home use, casual play, and learning, the DGX-670 offers the best value.
If you perform live, record, or need advanced sound customization, the FP-E50 is the better investment.

5. Final Verdict: Which One Offers Better Value?

🎹 Yamaha DGX-670 Wins If:

✅ You want interactive learning tools and a beginner-friendly interface.
✅ You enjoy playing with auto-accompaniment and built-in song features.
✅ You need a piano for home use, casual performances, and family entertainment.

🎤 Roland FP-E50 Wins If:

✅ You perform live and need Bluetooth MIDI & stereo PA outputs.
✅ You sing and want a built-in microphone input with effects.
✅ You want more advanced, expressive piano modeling and synth capabilities.

Overall Winner? 💰 It Depends on Your Needs!

• For learning, accompaniment, and home use, Yamaha DGX-670 is the best value.
• For gigging, recording, and advanced sound control, Roland FP-E50 is the best value.

At a similar price point, both offer fantastic value, but their features cater to different types of musicians.

Final Verdict

Choosing between the Yamaha DGX-670 and Roland FP-E50 depends on your specific needs as a musician. Both digital pianos offer exceptional value for their price, but they cater to different types of players.

🎹 Yamaha DGX-670: Best for Home Use, Learning & Arranger Features

The Yamaha DGX-670 is an excellent choice for home players, learners, and musicians who enjoy accompaniment styles. It offers:
✅ A rich Yamaha CFX grand piano sound with Virtual Resonance Modeling (VRM).
✅ Hundreds of accompaniment styles, making it perfect for one-man-band performances.
✅ Learning tools like Score Display, Chord Tutor, and Smart Pianist app integration.
✅ A large color LCD screen, making navigation easier.

However, it lacks Bluetooth MIDI, a microphone input, and dedicated stereo outputs for professional gigs. If you need a gig-friendly piano, the FP-E50 is a better choice.

🎤 Roland FP-E50: Best for Performers, Gigging & Sound Customization

The Roland FP-E50 is ideal for performers, singer-songwriters, and musicians who want advanced sound design. It features:
✅ SuperNATURAL piano modeling, offering a more organic, expressive piano tone.
✅ ZEN-Core engine with over 1000 instrument sounds, great for modern music production.
✅ Bluetooth MIDI, allowing for wireless DAW and app integration.
✅ A microphone input with vocal effects (reverb, auto-tune, vocoder).
✅ Stereo outputs for direct PA system connection.

However, it has fewer fixed accompaniment styles and lacks Yamaha’s advanced learning tools.

Which One Should You Choose?

• For home use, learning, and auto-accompaniment, choose the Yamaha DGX-670.
• For live performances, wireless MIDI, and vocal integration, go for the Roland FP-E50.

Both pianos are fantastic—it all depends on what features matter most to you! 🚀🎹

This expanded Final Verdict section now clearly outlines the best choice for different musicians. Let me know if you’d like further refinements! 😊🎶