If you’re in the market for a high-quality digital piano, the Yamaha DGX-670 and Roland FP-60X are two excellent options worth considering. Both pianos offer a blend of professional-grade sound, realistic key action, and modern features that appeal to a wide range of musicians. However, they are designed with slightly different users in mind, which makes choosing between them a matter of preference and priorities.
The Yamaha DGX-670 is a feature-packed arranger digital piano, meaning it includes built-in accompaniment styles, an extensive range of sounds, and additional functionalities suited for home playing, songwriting, and entertainment. The Roland FP-60X, on the other hand, is a portable stage piano, focusing more on authentic piano feel, excellent sound quality, and streamlined performance features, making it ideal for gigging musicians and serious pianists.
Both pianos fall within the mid-range price category, with the DGX-670 typically retailing around $850–$1,000, while the FP-60X is priced higher at around $1,200–$1,400. Given the price difference, one of the key questions is whether the FP-60X justifies its cost with superior performance, or if the DGX-670 provides better overall value.
In this in-depth comparison, we’ll analyze these two digital pianos based on design, keyboard feel, sound quality, speakers, functions, connectivity, and overall value to determine which one is the better choice for different types of players.
Yamaha FGX-670 vs Roland FP-60X Comparison Chart
If you click the links below, under the product images you will be redirected to Amazon.com. In case you then decide to buy anything, Amazon.com will pay me a commission. This doesn’t affect the honesty of this review in any way though.
| Feature | Yamaha DGX-670 | Roland FP-60X |
|---|---|---|
 |  | |
| Check the best price on Amazon | Check the best price on Amazon | |
| Intended Use | Home use, learning, entertainment | Performance, professional use |
| Keyboard Action | Graded Hammer Standard (GHS) | PHA-4 Standard (Ivory Feel) with Escapement |
| Key Material | Plastic (Matte Black Keys) | Textured Ivory Feel Keys |
| Keys | 88, fully weighted, graded | 88, fully weighted, graded |
| Escapement Simulation | ❌ No | ✅ Yes |
| Sound Engine | Yamaha CFX Grand Piano Sampling | Roland SuperNATURAL Piano Modeling |
| Polyphony | 256 notes | 256 notes |
| Number of Sounds | 630+ voices | 350+ voices |
| Piano Tones | 10+ acoustic piano tones | 15+ acoustic piano tones |
| Electric Pianos | 50+ | 30+ |
| Other Instrument Sounds | Over 500 (Strings, Brass, Organs, Synths, etc.) | Around 200 (Strings, Organs, Synths, etc.) |
| Auto-Accompaniment | ✅ Yes (263 styles) | ❌ No |
| Rhythm Patterns | ✅ Yes | ❌ No |
| Speakers | 2 x 6W (12W total) | 2 x 13W + 2 tweeters (26W total) |
| Speaker Placement | Downward-facing | Front-facing |
| Recording Capability | ✅ 16-track MIDI sequencer + Audio recording | ✅ MIDI + Audio recording (No multitrack MIDI) |
| USB to Host (MIDI/Audio) | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| USB to Device (File Storage) | ✅ Yes | ❌ No |
| Bluetooth Audio | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Bluetooth MIDI | ❌ No (Requires adapter) | ✅ Yes (Built-in) |
| Audio Outputs | 3.5mm AUX out | Dual 1/4” stereo line outs |
| Microphone Input | ✅ Yes (With vocal effects) | ❌ No |
| Headphone Jacks | 1 x 3.5mm | 2 x 1/4” |
| Sustain Pedal Input | ✅ Yes (Supports half-pedaling) | ✅ Yes (Supports half-pedaling) |
| 3-Pedal Unit Support | ✅ Yes (Yamaha LP-1) | ✅ Yes (Roland KPD-90) |
| Weight | 47.5 lbs (21.4 kg) | 42.7 lbs (19.4 kg) |
| Dimensions (W x D x H) | 55″ x 17.5″ x 5.7″ (without stand) | 50.6″ x 13.5″ x 5″ |
| Build Material | Plastic | Plastic & Metal |
| Stand Included? | ❌ No (Optional L-300 stand) | ❌ No (Optional KSC-72 stand) |
| Best For | Home players, hobbyists, songwriters, beginners | Gigging musicians, serious pianists, professionals |
| My individual reviews | Yamaha DGX-670 review | Roland FP-60X review |
Key Takeaways from the Table
✅ Yamaha DGX-670 is better if:
- You want more built-in sounds (630+ vs. 350+).
- You need auto-accompaniment and rhythm styles.
- You enjoy MIDI composition with a built-in 16-track sequencer.
- You want a microphone input with vocal effects for singing.
- You are a beginner or casual player looking for a fun and versatile instrument.
✅ Roland FP-60X is better if:
- You prioritize key action and authentic feel (PHA-4 with escapement).
- You need the best sound quality (SuperNATURAL modeling).
- You play live performances and need pro-grade stereo line outputs.
- You want powerful built-in speakers (26W vs. 12W).
- You prefer Bluetooth MIDI for wireless DAW and app integration.
- You need a lighter and more portable digital piano for gigs.
Recommendation
- The Yamaha DGX-670 is ideal for home players, hobbyists, and those who want a digital piano with extra features, backing tracks, and a variety of sounds.
- The Roland FP-60X is the superior choice for serious pianists, professionals, and performers who need realistic key action, superior sound, and high-quality connectivity options.
Both are excellent digital pianos, but the best choice depends on your needs and budget! 🎹😊
Design & Build Quality
When choosing a digital piano, design and build quality are essential factors, especially if you plan to move your instrument frequently or want a piano that fits well into your living space. The Yamaha DGX-670 and Roland FP-60X take different approaches in their design, each catering to different types of users.
Overall Design Philosophy
The Yamaha DGX-670 is primarily designed as a home-based arranger piano, offering a wide range of interactive features with a built-in user interface, a color screen, and physical controls. Its design leans towards versatility and entertainment, making it a great choice for beginners, casual players, and those who enjoy auto-accompaniment features. While it is technically portable, it is bulkier than most stage pianos, and its arranger-style layout makes it more suited for home use rather than professional gigs.
In contrast, the Roland FP-60X is a modern, minimalist stage piano built for portability, professional performance, and streamlined use. It prioritizes simplicity and compactness, making it an excellent choice for gigging musicians, serious pianists, and those who need a high-quality piano without the extra arranger functions. The interface is clean and functional, allowing for quick access to important settings without distractions.
Now, let’s break down the design and build quality in more detail, looking at materials, portability, weight, aesthetics, and user interface.
Materials & Build Quality
Yamaha DGX-670
- The body is made of plastic, which is standard for mid-range digital pianos.
- The keybed is securely built but has a lightweight feel compared to higher-end Yamaha models.
- The control panel is sturdy, with tactile buttons and a control knob that feel responsive.
- The LCD screen is bright and clear, making it easy to navigate menus.
- The optional L-300 stand and LP-1 pedal unit make it feel more like an upright digital piano, but these accessories must be purchased separately.
While the plastic body doesn’t feel cheap, it lacks the ruggedness of professional stage pianos. The DGX-670 is best suited for home use where it won’t be moved frequently.
Roland FP-60X
- The chassis is a mix of high-quality plastic and metal, giving it a more premium and durable feel.
- The keybed is robust, and the Ivory Feel texture on the keys adds a professional touch.
- The buttons and control panel are well-built, with a satisfying tactile response.
- The OLED screen is small but provides clear feedback.
- The FP-60X doesn’t come with a stand, but it can be paired with Roland’s KSC-72 stand and KPD-90 pedal unit, making it look like an elegant upright piano when set up for home use.
Compared to the DGX-670, the FP-60X has a more solid, professional-grade construction, making it better suited for frequent transport and live performances.
Verdict: Roland FP-60X wins in build quality due to its more premium materials and durability.
Portability & Weight
Portability is a major consideration if you plan to move your piano between home, rehearsals, or live performances.
- Yamaha DGX-670 Weight: 47.5 lbs (21.4 kg)
- Roland FP-60X Weight: 42.7 lbs (19.4 kg)
The DGX-670 is heavier and bulkier, making it less practical for musicians who need to transport their piano frequently. While it’s not impossible to move, it’s clear that Yamaha designed this piano mainly for stationary home use.
The FP-60X is significantly lighter while still maintaining a premium build. This makes it a much better choice for gigging musicians or those who need a portable digital piano that can be set up quickly at different venues.
Verdict: Roland FP-60X wins for portability because it is lighter, more compact, and easier to transport.
Aesthetics & Design Language
The visual appeal of a digital piano can be important, especially if it will be a permanent fixture in your home or if you’re performing on stage.
Yamaha DGX-670
- Available in black or white finishes.
- Has a console-style look with an arranger-style control panel.
- The large LCD screen and buttons give it a high-tech appearance.
- Looks best when paired with the optional L-300 stand, which gives it an elegant upright digital piano feel.
Roland FP-60X
- Available in black or white finishes.
- Features a minimalist, modern aesthetic.
- The control panel is sleek and unobtrusive, with touch-sensitive buttons.
- Looks equally great on a stand or tabletop, blending well in home or stage settings.
The DGX-670 looks more like a keyboard/workstation, which is great for home players who love a feature-rich control panel. Meanwhile, the FP-60X looks more like a stage piano, offering a sleek, professional design that suits serious musicians.
Verdict: Subjective. The DGX-670 is better for home players, while the FP-60X is better for professionals who prefer a clean and modern design.
User Interface & Controls
A good digital piano should have an intuitive interface that allows for quick adjustments without disrupting the playing experience.
Yamaha DGX-670: Feature-Rich Interface
- Full-color LCD screen for menu navigation.
- Physical buttons and a control knob for quick access to settings.
- Dedicated accompaniment controls for auto-chord and rhythm functions.
- More complex interface, requiring some learning time to master all features.
Roland FP-60X: Minimalist & Performance-Focused
- Smaller OLED screen (black and white) for essential settings.
- Simple button layout focused on quick sound selection.
- More streamlined and easy to use, even for beginners.
- No distractions—ideal for pianists who just want to play without extra functions.
If you love exploring different sounds, rhythms, and learning tools, the DGX-670 is better. However, if you prefer a straightforward interface that gets right to the point, the FP-60X is superior.
Verdict: Depends on preference. The DGX-670 offers more features, while the FP-60X is more intuitive and focused.
Final Thoughts on Design & Build Quality
| Feature | Yamaha DGX-670 | Roland FP-60X |
|---|---|---|
| Build Quality | Good, plastic body | Excellent, metal & plastic |
| Portability | Heavier (21.4 kg) | Lighter (19.4 kg) |
| Aesthetics | Arranger-style, home-oriented | Sleek, modern, minimalist |
| User Interface | Feature-rich, requires learning | Simple and performance-focused |
| Best For | Home players, hobbyists, songwriters | Gigging musicians, serious pianists |
If you prioritize features and home use, the DGX-670 is a great choice. However, if you want a premium, portable digital piano with a clean design, the FP-60X is the clear winner.
Keyboard & Key Action
One of the most critical aspects of a digital piano is the keyboard feel and action, as it directly affects playability, technique, and overall enjoyment. The Yamaha DGX-670 and Roland FP-60X use different key action technologies, each with its strengths and weaknesses. This section will provide a detailed comparison of their key action, response, material quality, and overall feel.
Understanding Key Action Types
Before diving into the specific key actions used in these two digital pianos, it’s important to understand the different types of digital piano key actions available:
- Unweighted Keys: Found in basic keyboards and synthesizers. These keys feel light and don’t simulate an acoustic piano’s touch.
- Semi-Weighted Keys: Adds some resistance but still lacks the full weight and mechanical realism of an acoustic piano.
- Fully Weighted Keys: Offers resistance similar to an acoustic piano but without the detailed mechanical simulation.
- Hammer-Action Keys: Uses small hammers inside the keybed to simulate an acoustic piano’s feel, closely mimicking a real piano.
- Graded Hammer Action: In addition to hammer action, these keys have graded resistance—meaning the lower notes feel heavier, and the higher notes feel lighter, just like an acoustic grand piano.
Both the Yamaha DGX-670 and Roland FP-60X have graded hammer action, but the actual implementation differs significantly between them.
Yamaha DGX-670: Graded Hammer Standard (GHS) Action
The Yamaha DGX-670 features Yamaha’s Graded Hammer Standard (GHS) action, which is one of Yamaha’s entry-level hammer actions found in many of their mid-range digital pianos.
Key Features of GHS Action
- Graded weight: The lower keys feel heavier, and the higher keys feel lighter—similar to an acoustic piano.
- Spring-less design: Uses hammer weights instead of springs, providing a natural feel.
- Matte black key texture: The black keys have a slightly textured finish, helping with grip. The white keys, however, are smooth plastic.
- Relatively light key action: Compared to Yamaha’s more advanced GH3 or NWX actions, the GHS action is lighter and less resistant.
How It Feels to Play
The GHS action is good for beginners and intermediate players, but more advanced pianists may find it lacking in key resistance and dynamic control. The keys don’t have escapement simulation, which means they lack the subtle notch feel found in real acoustic grand pianos when pressing the keys lightly.
GHS keys also rebound faster in the higher registers but can feel slightly sluggish in the lower registers, particularly when playing fast passages. This isn’t a dealbreaker for most casual players, but for serious pianists, it may feel less expressive compared to Roland’s key action.
Overall, GHS action is a solid option for those who are upgrading from a non-weighted keyboard, but it’s not the best if you are looking for a truly authentic acoustic piano feel.
2.3 Roland FP-60X: PHA-4 Standard Action
The Roland FP-60X is equipped with Roland’s PHA-4 Standard action, which is a fully weighted, graded hammer-action keybed with escapement simulation. This makes it a step above Yamaha’s GHS action in realism and responsiveness.
Key Features of PHA-4 Standard Action
- Graded Hammer Action: Like Yamaha’s GHS, this keybed is graded, with heavier resistance in the lower keys and lighter resistance in the higher keys.
- Ivory Feel Texture: Unlike the DGX-670’s smooth plastic white keys, the FP-60X features Ivory Feel textured keys, which provide better grip and a more natural feel.
- Escapement Simulation: This mimics the slight notch or resistance point when pressing keys lightly, simulating an acoustic piano’s key mechanism.
- Quiet Key Mechanism: Roland has designed the PHA-4 action to be quieter, reducing mechanical noise when playing.
How It Feels to Play
The PHA-4 action is noticeably more realistic than the Yamaha GHS action, making it a better choice for serious pianists. The Ivory Feel keys provide a superior tactile experience, giving the impression of playing a high-end grand piano.
The escapement mechanism is a big advantage because it allows better control of soft dynamics and delicate phrasing, making it more expressive than the Yamaha DGX-670. Fast repetition is also smoother, and the keys feel more responsive across all registers.
If you are a pianist looking for a more authentic acoustic piano experience, the Roland FP-60X’s PHA-4 action is the superior choice.
Key Material & Texture Comparison
| Feature | Yamaha DGX-670 | Roland FP-60X |
|---|---|---|
| Key Material | Plastic (matte black keys) | Ivory Feel keys (textured) |
| Texture | Smooth white keys, slightly grippy black keys | Textured white and black keys |
| Escapement Simulation | ❌ No | ✅ Yes |
| Weighted Action | ✅ Yes (but lighter) | ✅ Yes (more realistic) |
The Roland FP-60X wins here because its Ivory Feel keys provide a superior playing experience, while the Yamaha DGX-670 feels more like a beginner-to-intermediate keyboard.
Dynamic Range & Expressiveness
Dynamic control refers to how well a digital piano can respond to variations in touch, allowing for expressive playing.
- The Roland FP-60X provides better responsiveness, allowing for greater control over soft and loud notes, making it better suited for classical and jazz pianists.
- The Yamaha DGX-670, while decent, has less resistance, making it harder to control dynamics with precision.
If you play complex classical pieces, jazz improvisations, or need detailed touch sensitivity, the Roland FP-60X is the better option.
Suitability for Different Players
| Player Type | Yamaha DGX-670 | Roland FP-60X |
|---|---|---|
| Beginners | ✅ Good choice | ✅ Good choice |
| Intermediate Players | ✅ Decent, but lacks depth | ✅ Excellent |
| Advanced Players | ❌ May feel too light | ✅ Excellent |
| Classical Pianists | ❌ Not ideal | ✅ Great choice |
| Jazz Musicians | ❌ Lacks expression | ✅ Excellent touch response |
| Gigging Musicians | ❌ Too bulky | ✅ Portable & responsive |
The Yamaha DGX-670 is better for casual players, while the Roland FP-60X is the better choice for serious musicians.
Final Verdict: Which Key Action is Better?
| Category | Winner |
|---|---|
| Realism & Authenticity | Roland FP-60X |
| Key Texture & Feel | Roland FP-60X |
| Expressiveness & Dynamic Control | Roland FP-60X |
| Fast Repetition & Responsiveness | Roland FP-60X |
| Best for Beginners | Tie (Both are good) |
| Best for Advanced Pianists | Roland FP-60X |
Overall Winner: Roland FP-60X
The Roland FP-60X offers a superior playing experience, with better key action, improved dynamics, and escapement simulation, making it the better choice for serious musicians. The Yamaha DGX-670, while decent, is better suited for casual and home players rather than professionals.
Sound Quality
Sound quality is arguably the most important aspect of a digital piano, as it determines how expressive, realistic, and enjoyable the instrument is to play. Both the Yamaha DGX-670 and Roland FP-60X feature advanced sound engines, but they take different approaches to sound generation, polyphony, tonal variety, and sound customization.
This section will provide an in-depth comparison of the sound engines, sampling technologies, speaker quality, sound customization options, and overall tonal characteristics of both pianos.
Sound Engine Technology: Sampling vs. Modeling
The core of a digital piano’s sound comes from its sound engine—the technology responsible for generating piano tones and other instrument sounds.
| Feature | Yamaha DGX-670 | Roland FP-60X |
|---|---|---|
| Sound Engine | Yamaha CFX Grand Piano Sampling | Roland SuperNATURAL Modeling |
| Polyphony | 256 notes | 256 notes |
| Total Voices | 630+ | 350+ |
Let’s break these differences down in more detail.
Yamaha DGX-670: CFX Grand Piano Sampling
Yamaha’s CFX Grand Piano sound is sampled from their flagship Yamaha CFX Concert Grand, a 9-foot concert grand piano known for its bright, powerful, and expressive tone.
How It Works
- High-resolution multi-layered samples capture the nuances of the CFX Grand.
- Velocity-sensitive recordings ensure that different touch strengths trigger different samples, allowing for expressive playing.
- VRM (Virtual Resonance Modeling) simulates string resonance, damper resonance, and key-off effects for more natural realism.
The CFX sound is bright, clear, and articulate, making it ideal for pop, classical, and solo performances. However, because it relies on sample playback, there is less real-time adaptability compared to Roland’s SuperNATURAL modeling.
Roland FP-60X: SuperNATURAL Piano Modeling
Roland’s SuperNATURAL sound engine uses a combination of sampling and digital modeling to create a more organic, realistic piano sound.
How It Works
- Instead of simply playing back recorded samples, the SuperNATURAL engine models how an acoustic piano behaves in real-time.
- This allows for seamless dynamic transitions without noticeable jumps between sample layers.
- The sound responds more naturally to subtle differences in touch and pedal use.
The result is a smoother, more expressive piano tone that adapts dynamically based on how you play. Compared to Yamaha’s bright and clear CFX sound, Roland’s SuperNATURAL engine produces a warmer, more resonant tone with a natural decay that mimics a real acoustic piano more closely.
Tonal Characteristics: Bright vs. Warm
The Yamaha DGX-670 and Roland FP-60X sound very different, even when playing the same piece of music.
- Yamaha DGX-670 (CFX Grand):
- Bright, crisp, and cutting—great for solos and modern music.
- More focused mid and treble frequencies, making melodies stand out.
- Slightly synthetic sustain, especially when played at low volumes.
- Roland FP-60X (SuperNATURAL):
- Warm, full-bodied, and resonant—ideal for classical and jazz.
- More natural note decay and resonance, giving it a realistic feel.
- Better at dynamic expression, especially for soft and nuanced playing.
If you prefer a bright, clear tone with strong treble presence, the Yamaha DGX-670 is the better choice. If you like a warmer, more resonant sound that mimics an acoustic piano closely, the Roland FP-60X wins.
Polyphony: 256 Notes on Both Pianos
Both pianos offer 256-note polyphony, meaning they can handle complex pieces with sustained notes and layering without sound cut-offs.
- Polyphony matters when playing with sustain pedal, as more notes need to be sustained simultaneously.
- Both pianos are excellent in this area, ensuring that even advanced classical pieces like Rachmaninoff or Debussy sound natural.
This category is a tie, as both pianos have ample polyphony for any playing style.
Sound Variety: More vs. Less
| Feature | Yamaha DGX-670 | Roland FP-60X |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Voices | 630+ | 350+ |
| Instrument Types | Pianos, E-Pianos, Strings, Synths, Drums, Organs, etc. | Pianos, E-Pianos, Strings, Organs, Synths, etc. |
The Yamaha DGX-670 wins in sheer variety, offering over 630 instrument voices, including:
- Multiple grand pianos, electric pianos, organs, strings, synths, and world instruments
- Drums and percussion kits
- Hundreds of accompaniment styles
The Roland FP-60X is more focused on high-quality core sounds, featuring pianos, electric pianos, and a selection of orchestral instruments, but it lacks the extensive accompaniment and variety of the DGX-670.
If you love experimenting with sounds, the DGX-670 is the better choice. If you want a focused selection of high-quality sounds, go with the FP-60X.
Speaker System: Power & Clarity
| Feature | Yamaha DGX-670 | Roland FP-60X |
|---|---|---|
| Speaker Output | 2 x 6W (12W total) | 2 x 13W + 2 tweeters (26W total) |
| Speaker Placement | Downward-facing | Front-facing |
- The Roland FP-60X has a more powerful speaker system (26W vs. 12W), providing a fuller, richer sound.
- The FP-60X’s front-facing speakers produce a clearer and more immersive tone, whereas the DGX-670’s speakers face downward, making them less effective for live performance.
- If you plan to use built-in speakers without external amplification, the FP-60X is the superior choice.
Sound Customization & Effects
- Yamaha DGX-670: Offers reverb, chorus, EQ, and DSP effects, as well as Virtual Resonance Modeling (VRM) to simulate sympathetic string resonance.
- Roland FP-60X: Features ambience control, EQ, and tone shaping tools, along with full resonance modeling for a more organic, acoustic-like response.
Both pianos offer extensive sound customization, but Roland’s modeling technology gives it an edge in natural resonance and tonal flexibility.
Final Verdict: Which Piano Sounds Better?
| Category | Winner |
|---|---|
| Sound Engine | Roland FP-60X (SuperNATURAL modeling is more expressive) |
| Tonal Character | Depends on preference (Bright: Yamaha, Warm: Roland) |
| Polyphony | Tie (256 notes each) |
| Sound Variety | Yamaha DGX-670 (More voices and styles) |
| Speaker System | Roland FP-60X (More powerful, front-facing speakers) |
| Sound Customization | Roland FP-60X (Better resonance modeling) |
Overall Winner: Roland FP-60X for Pure Piano Sound, Yamaha DGX-670 for Variety
- If you want the most realistic piano sound, go with the Roland FP-60X.
- If you love sound variety and accompaniment features, the Yamaha DGX-670 is the better choice.
Speaker System
A digital piano’s speaker system plays a crucial role in how the instrument sounds, especially for those who primarily use the built-in speakers instead of external amplification or headphones. The Yamaha DGX-670 and Roland FP-60X have significantly different speaker setups, each catering to different usage scenarios.
This section will examine the speaker power, clarity, projection, placement, and overall sound experience of both pianos.
Speaker Power & Output
| Feature | Yamaha DGX-670 | Roland FP-60X |
|---|---|---|
| Speaker Configuration | 2 speakers (Full-range) | 2 speakers + 2 tweeters |
| Speaker Output Power | 2 x 6W (12W total) | 2 x 13W (Main) + 2 tweeters (26W total) |
| Total Wattage | 12W | 26W |
| Speaker Placement | Downward-facing | Front-facing |
Right away, we see that the Roland FP-60X has more than twice the power of the Yamaha DGX-670 (26W vs. 12W). This results in a fuller, richer, and more dynamic sound, making it better suited for performance and practice in larger spaces.
- The DGX-670’s 12W output is adequate for home use, but it lacks depth and projection at higher volumes.
- The FP-60X’s 26W output provides a louder and more immersive sound, with better clarity in the mid and treble frequencies.
If you plan to perform without external speakers, the FP-60X has a clear advantage in power and projection.
Speaker Placement & Projection
Yamaha DGX-670: Downward-Facing Speakers
The DGX-670 features two full-range speakers positioned underneath the piano, facing downward.
- Pros:
✅ Creates a soft, diffused sound that fills the room evenly.
✅ Works well in smaller rooms, providing a pleasant, ambient experience. - Cons:
❌ Sound can feel muffled or less direct, especially when playing at lower volumes.
❌ Not ideal for live performances, as sound disperses unpredictably.
Downward-facing speakers are fine for casual playing at home, but they lack the clarity and direct projection needed for more serious practice or performances.
Roland FP-60X: Front-Facing Speakers + Tweeters
The FP-60X, in contrast, has two powerful front-facing speakers plus two additional tweeters, which drastically improves sound clarity and detail.
- Pros:
✅ Direct, forward-facing projection makes the sound feel full and immersive.
✅ Tweeters enhance high-frequency clarity, making the piano tone more detailed and expressive.
✅ Works better for live performance and group playing, since sound is more accurately projected outward. - Cons:
❌ May sound too bright in some settings, especially at high volumes.
The FP-60X’s front-facing speaker setup is clearly superior, especially for those who need better projection and detailed sound clarity.
Sound Depth & Bass Response
The depth and fullness of sound depend on both the speaker size and how well the digital piano replicates the lower frequencies.
- The Yamaha DGX-670, with its smaller speakers and lower wattage, produces a decent but somewhat thin bass response. When playing low-end piano notes or layered sounds, the bass doesn’t feel as powerful or rich.
- The Roland FP-60X, thanks to its larger, more powerful speakers, produces a fuller, more balanced bass response. The sound doesn’t distort even at higher volumes, making it better suited for realistic piano tones and dynamic playing.
For players who enjoy deep, resonant bass tones, the FP-60X is the better choice.
Volume & Distortion Handling
A good speaker system should be able to maintain clarity and balance even when played at high volumes.
- The Yamaha DGX-670’s speakers perform well at moderate volumes but may sound slightly compressed or distorted at higher levels, especially when using heavy sustain or layering multiple sounds.
- The Roland FP-60X, with its higher wattage, handles loud volumes more effectively. It can fill a medium-sized room with rich sound without losing clarity.
If you plan to play at higher volumes or in larger rooms, the FP-60X provides a more powerful and distortion-free experience.
External Amplification & Output Options
Both digital pianos offer audio output ports for connecting to external speakers, amplifiers, or recording equipment.
- Yamaha DGX-670: Features stereo AUX output for external speakers but lacks dedicated 1/4″ line outputs (which are standard for professional stage pianos).
- Roland FP-60X: Has dedicated 1/4″ stereo line outputs, making it easier to connect to PA systems and amplifiers, a huge advantage for stage performers.
If you plan to use external amplification, the Roland FP-60X is better suited for professional setups.
Summary: Which Piano Has the Better Speaker System?
| Category | Winner |
|---|---|
| Power Output | Roland FP-60X (26W vs. 12W) |
| Speaker Clarity | Roland FP-60X (Better high-end detail with tweeters) |
| Sound Projection | Roland FP-60X (Front-facing design provides better clarity and depth) |
| Bass Response | Roland FP-60X (Fuller, more natural bass tones) |
| Volume & Distortion Handling | Roland FP-60X (Handles high volumes better without distortion) |
| Best for Home Use | Tie (Both work well in small rooms) |
| Best for Performance Use | Roland FP-60X (Better projection and external outputs) |
Final Verdict: Roland FP-60X Has the Superior Speaker System
The Roland FP-60X wins in every category related to speaker performance. With more power, better projection, additional tweeters for detail, and superior bass response, it outperforms the Yamaha DGX-670 in sound quality and live performance usability.
However, the Yamaha DGX-670’s speakers are perfectly adequate for home practice and casual playing. If you mainly play at home and don’t need high volume levels, the DGX-670 is still a good option.
But if you want the best built-in speaker experience, the Roland FP-60X is the clear winner.
Features & Functions
Digital pianos offer far more than just a great keyboard and sound—they often include extra features that enhance the playing experience. The Yamaha DGX-670 and Roland FP-60X have very different approaches to features and functionality, with the DGX-670 focusing on entertainment, learning tools, and auto-accompaniment, while the FP-60X prioritizes professional performance, simplicity, and customizability.
This section will examine the sound selection, accompaniment styles, recording options, learning tools, and additional unique features of both pianos to help determine which one offers the most value.
Sound Selection & Instrument Voices
| Feature | Yamaha DGX-670 | Roland FP-60X |
|---|---|---|
| Total Sounds/Voices | 630+ | 350+ |
| Piano Sounds | 10+ acoustic pianos | 15+ acoustic pianos |
| Electric Pianos | 50+ | 30+ |
| Organs, Strings, Synths, etc. | 500+ | 200+ |
| Custom Sound Editing | Basic layering and DSP effects | Advanced EQ and tone shaping |
Yamaha DGX-670: A Huge Variety of Sounds
The DGX-670 shines when it comes to sound variety, offering over 630 instrument voices, including:
- Grand pianos, upright pianos, and honky-tonk pianos
- Vintage electric pianos and synths
- Organs, strings, brass, woodwinds, guitars, and world instruments
- Drum kits and sound effects
The Roland FP-60X has fewer sounds (around 350), but Roland has focused on quality over quantity. The piano and electric piano sounds are higher in fidelity, while the DGX-670 offers more variety for those who want orchestral and synthetic sounds.
Winner: Yamaha DGX-670 (if you love variety) | Roland FP-60X (if you care about sound realism)
Accompaniment & Auto-Backing Features
| Feature | Yamaha DGX-670 | Roland FP-60X |
|---|---|---|
| Auto-Accompaniment | Yes (263 styles) | ❌ No |
| Interactive Chord Recognition | Yes | ❌ No |
| Backing Band Simulation | Yes | ❌ No |
| Rhythm Patterns | Yes | ❌ No |
Yamaha DGX-670: A Full Arranger Piano
The DGX-670 includes 263 accompaniment styles, meaning you can play chords with your left hand, and the piano will generate a full backing band in real-time. This is perfect for solo performers and songwriters.
- You can control the accompaniment’s intensity, adding drums, bass, and harmonies with one touch.
- It includes interactive chord recognition, meaning the backing band follows your playing style.
- Great for pop, jazz, and ballad styles, as it allows for rich, live-sounding performances.
Roland FP-60X: Focused on Solo Performance
The FP-60X does not have an auto-accompaniment feature. Instead, it focuses purely on piano performance.
If you need a built-in backing band, the DGX-670 is clearly superior. However, for those who prefer simplicity, the FP-60X keeps things focused on pure piano playing.
Winner: Yamaha DGX-670 (only option with auto-accompaniment).
Recording & Playback Capabilities
| Feature | Yamaha DGX-670 | Roland FP-60X |
|---|---|---|
| MIDI Recording | ✅ Yes (16-track sequencer) | ✅ Yes |
| Audio Recording | ✅ Yes (WAV) | ✅ Yes (WAV) |
| Internal Storage | Yes (for MIDI files) | ❌ No |
| Metronome & Tempo Control | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
Yamaha DGX-670: A Mini Recording Studio
The DGX-670 has a 16-track MIDI recorder, allowing you to create layered compositions directly on the keyboard. You can:
- Record multiple instruments separately (piano, bass, drums, strings).
- Save your recordings as MIDI files or WAV audio files.
- Use tempo control and a built-in metronome for precise recordings.
Roland FP-60X: Simple but Effective Recording
The FP-60X also allows MIDI and audio recording, but lacks the multi-track MIDI sequencing found in the DGX-670. This means it’s more suited for capturing simple performances rather than full compositions.
If you want advanced recording tools, the DGX-670 wins. But if you just need basic recording for practice and performance, the FP-60X is still a solid option.
Winner: Yamaha DGX-670 (more recording capabilities).
Learning & Practice Tools
| Feature | Yamaha DGX-670 | Roland FP-60X |
|---|---|---|
| Lesson Mode | ✅ Yes | ❌ No |
| Play Along Songs | ✅ Yes | ❌ No |
| Chord Tutor & Guide | ✅ Yes | ❌ No |
The DGX-670 is the better option for beginners, thanks to its:
- Lesson Mode: Helps students practice with interactive guidance.
- Play-Along Songs: Includes 100+ built-in songs for practice.
- Chord Tutor: Displays real-time chord suggestions as you play.
The Roland FP-60X lacks these features, as it is more performance-focused. If you are a beginner, the DGX-670 is the clear winner.
Winner: Yamaha DGX-670 (better learning tools).
Other Unique Features
Yamaha DGX-670
- Bluetooth Audio Streaming (Play music from your phone through the piano speakers).
- Microphone Input with Effects (Sing along with vocal effects).
- Wireless MIDI (With Yamaha’s Wireless Adapter).
Roland FP-60X
- Bluetooth MIDI & Audio (Full wireless connectivity).
- Advanced EQ & Tone Editing.
- More realistic pedal response.
Both pianos offer Bluetooth audio streaming, but the FP-60X supports Bluetooth MIDI, making it better for wireless DAW integration.
Winner: Tie (Depends on what you need).
Final Verdict: Which Piano Has Better Features?
| Category | Winner |
|---|---|
| Sound Variety | Yamaha DGX-670 (630+ sounds) |
| Accompaniment Features | Yamaha DGX-670 (263 backing styles) |
| Recording & MIDI Sequencing | Yamaha DGX-670 (16-track MIDI recorder) |
| Learning Tools | Yamaha DGX-670 (Lesson mode & play-along songs) |
| Performance-Focused Features | Roland FP-60X (Better EQ and tone shaping) |
| Bluetooth Features | Tie (Both offer Bluetooth Audio, FP-60X has Bluetooth MIDI) |
Overall Winner: Yamaha DGX-670 for Features, Roland FP-60X for Performance
- If you want more built-in sounds, accompaniment styles, and recording tools, go with the DGX-670.
- If you prefer a clean, distraction-free performance instrument with Bluetooth MIDI, the FP-60X is better.
Best for Beginners & Home Use: Yamaha DGX-670
Best for Gigging & Pro Use: Roland FP-60X
Connectivity & Expandability
Connectivity and expandability are key factors when choosing a digital piano, especially for musicians who plan to use their instrument with external speakers, computers, DAWs, MIDI controllers, or other devices. The Yamaha DGX-670 and Roland FP-60X both offer a variety of connectivity options, but they cater to different types of users.
In this section, we will analyze and compare their USB, MIDI, Bluetooth, audio outputs, pedal connectivity, and expandability options to determine which piano offers the most flexibility.
USB & MIDI Connectivity
| Feature | Yamaha DGX-670 | Roland FP-60X |
|---|---|---|
| USB to Host (MIDI & Audio) | ✅ Yes (MIDI + Audio) | ✅ Yes (MIDI + Audio) |
| USB to Device (External Storage) | ✅ Yes (Save & Load Files) | ❌ No |
| MIDI I/O Ports | ❌ No (Only via USB) | ❌ No (Only via USB) |
Yamaha DGX-670: USB Flexibility with External Storage
The Yamaha DGX-670 offers both USB to Host and USB to Device, making it a great option for saving and transferring music files.
- USB to Host: Allows you to connect the piano to a computer, tablet, or DAW (Digital Audio Workstation) for MIDI control.
- USB to Device: Lets you save recordings and MIDI sequences onto a USB flash drive for easy backup.
- No traditional MIDI I/O ports, meaning you’ll need to use USB for MIDI connections.
Roland FP-60X: High-Quality USB MIDI & Audio
The FP-60X also features USB to Host, but it lacks USB to Device, meaning you cannot save performances directly to a flash drive.
- USB to Host supports both MIDI & audio, allowing high-quality direct recording to DAWs.
- Like the DGX-670, it does not have traditional MIDI IN/OUT ports, meaning USB is the only way to send MIDI signals.
If you need USB storage and more file management options, the DGX-670 is better. But if you just need a great USB MIDI/audio interface, both pianos perform well.
Winner: Yamaha DGX-670 (USB storage support is a plus).
Bluetooth Connectivity: MIDI & Audio
| Feature | Yamaha DGX-670 | Roland FP-60X |
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth Audio (Play Music Wirelessly) | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Bluetooth MIDI (Wireless DAW & App Integration) | ❌ No (Only via Adapter) | ✅ Yes (Built-in) |
Yamaha DGX-670: Bluetooth Audio, No MIDI
- Bluetooth Audio allows you to stream music from your phone, tablet, or computer through the DGX-670’s speakers.
- No built-in Bluetooth MIDI, but you can add it with Yamaha’s optional UD-BT01 wireless adapter.
Roland FP-60X: Full Bluetooth MIDI & Audio
- Supports both Bluetooth Audio & Bluetooth MIDI.
- Bluetooth MIDI allows for wireless DAW and app integration, making it easier to control virtual instruments or notation software without cables.
- Great for iPad users and those who want a wireless setup.
Winner: Roland FP-60X (Better wireless MIDI support).
Audio Output & Input Options
| Feature | Yamaha DGX-670 | Roland FP-60X |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo Line Outputs | ❌ No (Only AUX Out) | ✅ Yes (Dual 1/4” Line Outs) |
| AUX Output | ✅ Yes (Single 3.5mm Out) | ✅ Yes (Stereo 1/4” Outputs) |
| Microphone Input | ✅ Yes (With Effects) | ❌ No |
Yamaha DGX-670: Consumer-Level Audio Outputs
The DGX-670 includes a simple AUX Out (3.5mm jack), which is great for connecting to small speakers or headphones, but not ideal for professional stage setups.
- Microphone Input: Allows you to plug in a mic and add effects to your voice.
- No dedicated line outputs, which can be limiting if you want to connect to a PA system for live performances.
Roland FP-60X: Professional-Grade Outputs
- Features dedicated 1/4” stereo line outputs, making it easy to connect to amplifiers, PA systems, or studio monitors.
- No microphone input, but better connectivity for professional musicians.
If you play live gigs or use external speakers, the FP-60X’s dedicated line outs make it the superior choice.
Winner: Roland FP-60X (Better output options for professionals).
Headphone Connectivity
| Feature | Yamaha DGX-670 | Roland FP-60X |
|---|---|---|
| Headphone Output | ✅ Yes (3.5mm jack) | ✅ Yes (Two 1/4” jacks) |
| Dual Headphone Jacks | ❌ No | ✅ Yes |
Yamaha DGX-670: Standard Headphone Support
- Includes a single 3.5mm headphone jack, which is fine for solo practice.
- Lacks dual headphone jacks, so you can’t easily practice with a teacher or partner.
Roland FP-60X: Dual Headphone Jacks for Lessons
- Offers two 1/4” headphone jacks, which is great for duets and teaching scenarios.
- Lets two people play at the same time without disturbing others.
Winner: Roland FP-60X (Dual headphone jacks are great for lessons).
Pedal & Stand Connectivity
| Feature | Yamaha DGX-670 | Roland FP-60X |
|---|---|---|
| Sustain Pedal Input | ✅ Yes (Supports half-pedaling) | ✅ Yes (Supports half-pedaling) |
| 3-Pedal Unit Support | ✅ Yes (LP-1 Pedal Unit) | ✅ Yes (KPD-90 Pedal Unit) |
Both pianos support:
- Standard sustain pedals (with half-pedaling support).
- Optional 3-pedal units (Yamaha LP-1 vs. Roland KPD-90).
Since both offer similar pedal connectivity, this category is a tie.
Winner: Tie.
Final Verdict: Which Piano Has Better Connectivity?
| Category | Winner |
|---|---|
| USB & MIDI | Yamaha DGX-670 (USB storage support) |
| Bluetooth | Roland FP-60X (Built-in Bluetooth MIDI) |
| Audio Outputs | Roland FP-60X (Professional stereo line outs) |
| Microphone Input | Yamaha DGX-670 (Includes vocal effects) |
| Headphone Support | Roland FP-60X (Dual headphone jacks) |
| Pedal Expandability | Tie (Both support 3-pedal units) |
Overall Winner: Roland FP-60X for Professional Use, Yamaha DGX-670 for Home & Learning
- If you need better stage connectivity (line outs, Bluetooth MIDI, dual headphones) → Roland FP-60X is better.
- If you want USB file storage, a microphone input, and more general connectivity → Yamaha DGX-670 is better.
Best for Home Players & Casual Use: Yamaha DGX-670
Best for Performers & Studio Use: Roland FP-60X
Value for Money
When comparing the Yamaha DGX-670 and the Roland FP-60X, one of the biggest factors to consider is value for money. While both pianos offer excellent features, their price points, target users, and overall value propositions are quite different.
In this section, we will examine their pricing, included accessories, long-term value, resale potential, and the best choice for different types of users to determine which piano offers the most bang for your buck.
Price Comparison
| Model | Price Range |
|---|---|
| Yamaha DGX-670 | $850 – $1,000 |
| Roland FP-60X | $1,200 – $1,400 |
The Roland FP-60X is more expensive, typically costing $300 to $400 more than the Yamaha DGX-670. The big question is: Does the FP-60X justify the higher price, or is the DGX-670 the better deal?
To answer that, we need to consider what each piano offers for the money.
What You Get for the Price
Yamaha DGX-670: Feature-Packed for Home & Learning
For under $1,000, the Yamaha DGX-670 offers:
✅ 630+ sounds (vs. 350 on the FP-60X)
✅ Auto-accompaniment styles (263 backing rhythms)
✅ Built-in learning tools (Lesson Mode, Chord Tutor)
✅ 16-track MIDI recorder for composing music
✅ Microphone input with effects for singing
✅ USB to Device support (Save performances to USB drive)
This makes the DGX-670 an excellent value for home users, beginners, and those who want a versatile digital piano with tons of extra features.
Roland FP-60X: Premium Sound & Professional Build
For $1,200 – $1,400, the Roland FP-60X focuses on high-quality core features rather than extra functionality. It offers:
✅ Superior PHA-4 key action (More realistic feel than DGX-670)
✅ SuperNATURAL piano modeling (More organic piano tone)
✅ Powerful 26W speaker system (Twice as powerful as DGX-670)
✅ Bluetooth MIDI & Audio (Wireless app integration)
✅ Professional stereo line outputs (For live performances)
The FP-60X is designed for serious pianists and performers, prioritizing realism, sound quality, and performance-oriented features.
Included Accessories & Additional Costs
| Accessory | Yamaha DGX-670 | Roland FP-60X |
|---|---|---|
| Sustain Pedal | ✅ Yes (Basic pedal included) | ✅ Yes (Basic pedal included) |
| Stand | ❌ No (Optional L-300 stand costs ~$150) | ❌ No (Optional KSC-72 stand costs ~$180) |
| 3-Pedal Unit | ❌ No (Optional LP-1 costs ~$90) | ❌ No (Optional KPD-90 costs ~$120) |
Both pianos require additional purchases if you want a full setup (stand + 3-pedal unit). The Roland FP-60X accessories cost slightly more, which increases the total investment.
Winner: Yamaha DGX-670 (Lower base price & cheaper accessories).
Long-Term Value & Durability
🔹 Yamaha DGX-670:
- Plastic build feels less durable than Roland’s metal chassis.
- The GHS key action is entry-level, which may not satisfy advanced players in the long run.
- Feature-packed, but may feel outdated sooner than the FP-60X.
🔹 Roland FP-60X:
- Higher build quality, designed for years of professional use.
- Better key action (PHA-4) lasts longer and remains satisfying over time.
- More future-proof due to better Bluetooth MIDI support and high-quality piano modeling.
Winner: Roland FP-60X (Better long-term investment).
Resale Value
A good digital piano should retain value if you decide to upgrade later.
- Yamaha DGX-670:
❌ Lower resale value because it’s more of a feature-heavy beginner/intermediate piano.
✅ Still a good second-hand buy for hobbyists looking for a versatile arranger piano. - Roland FP-60X:
✅ Higher resale value because Roland stage pianos hold their worth better.
✅ Since it’s performance-focused, professional musicians continue to seek out used FP-series pianos.
If you plan to sell your piano in a few years, the Roland FP-60X is a better investment.
Winner: Roland FP-60X (Better resale value).
Who Should Buy Each Piano?
Buy the Yamaha DGX-670 If:
✅ You are a beginner or intermediate player who wants a feature-packed, fun digital piano.
✅ You enjoy auto-accompaniment and interactive learning tools.
✅ You compose or arrange music and need a 16-track MIDI recorder.
✅ You want a great piano for home use with a built-in microphone input.
✅ You’re on a tighter budget and want the most features for the money.
Buy the Roland FP-60X If:
✅ You are a serious pianist or performer looking for a high-quality instrument with superior key action.
✅ You want the best piano sound and speaker system in this price range.
✅ You need Bluetooth MIDI for wireless DAW integration.
✅ You play live performances and need professional audio outputs.
✅ You’re willing to pay extra for a higher-end, long-term investment.
Final Verdict: Which Piano Offers the Best Value?
| Category | Winner |
|---|---|
| Affordability | Yamaha DGX-670 |
| Features for the Price | Yamaha DGX-670 |
| Build Quality & Durability | Roland FP-60X |
| Key Action & Playability | Roland FP-60X |
| Resale Value | Roland FP-60X |
| Best for Beginners | Yamaha DGX-670 |
| Best for Professionals | Roland FP-60X |
Overall Conclusion:
- Best Budget-Friendly Choice for Versatility & Learning: Yamaha DGX-670
- Best Long-Term Investment for Serious Pianists & Performers: Roland FP-60X
Both pianos provide excellent value, but the DGX-670 is better for home use and casual players, while the FP-60X is the smarter choice for professional musicians.
If you want a fun, feature-rich instrument, go for the Yamaha DGX-670.
If you want the best playing experience and sound quality, go for the Roland FP-60X.
Final Verdict
After thoroughly comparing the Yamaha DGX-670 and Roland FP-60X in design, keyboard action, sound quality, speaker system, features, connectivity, and value, it’s clear that these two digital pianos cater to different types of musicians.
Which One is Right for You?
Choose the Yamaha DGX-670 if you:
✅ Are a beginner or intermediate player looking for a feature-packed digital piano.
✅ Enjoy auto-accompaniment styles, learning tools, and interactive features.
✅ Want a large variety of sounds (630+) beyond just pianos.
✅ Prefer an affordable digital piano with built-in speakers for home use.
✅ Need a MIDI recorder, play-along songs, and vocal effects for songwriting or casual performances.
The DGX-670 is ideal for home players, learners, and those who want a fun, all-in-one instrument with entertainment features and arranger functions. It’s an excellent choice for casual pianists, hobbyists, and music creators who want a versatile keyboard with advanced functions.
Choose the Roland FP-60X if you:
✅ Are a serious pianist or professional performer who needs realistic key action.
✅ Prioritize sound quality and natural dynamics over extra features.
✅ Need better speakers (26W) and superior sound projection for performances.
✅ Want Bluetooth MIDI for wireless DAW and app integration.
✅ Require professional audio outputs (stereo line outs) for live gigs or studio recording.
The FP-60X is the best choice for advanced players, gigging musicians, and those who prioritize a premium piano-playing experience. It’s a long-term investment for those who value realism, portability, and high-quality sound over entertainment features.
Final Thought:
If you want versatility, learning tools, and variety, pick the DGX-670.
If you want authentic piano feel, pro-level sound, and performance features, go with the FP-60X.