When looking for a digital piano under $1000–$1300, two of the most popular choices are the Yamaha DGX-670 and Roland FP-30X. Both instruments cater to different types of musicians, making it essential to compare their design, keyboard feel, sound quality, speaker system, features, connectivity, and overall value before making a purchase.
The Yamaha DGX-670 is a feature-packed ensemble digital piano with a strong focus on arranger functions, backing accompaniments, and an extensive selection of sounds. It appeals to musicians who want a versatile, all-in-one instrument for home use, composition, or entertainment.
On the other hand, the Roland FP-30X is a compact, portable digital piano with a primary focus on authentic piano feel and sound, making it ideal for serious pianists, students, and gigging musicians who prioritize realistic touch and portability over extra features.
Let’s break down each aspect to see how these two pianos compare.
Yamaha DGX-670 vs Roland FP-30X Comparison Chart
If you click the links below, under the product images you will be redirected to Amazon.com. In case you then decide to buy anything, Amazon.com will pay me a commission. This doesn’t affect the honesty of this review in any way though.
| Feature | Yamaha DGX-670 | Roland FP-30X |
|---|---|---|
 |  | |
| Check the best price on Amazon | Check the best price on Amazon | |
| Type | Digital Piano & Arranger | Digital Piano (Stage & Home) |
| Keyboard Action | Graded Hammer Standard (GHS) | PHA-4 Standard (with Escapement) |
| Keys | 88 fully weighted keys | 88 fully weighted keys |
| Key Texture | Matte black keys, glossy white keys | Ivory Feel textured keys |
| Touch Sensitivity | 4 levels (Soft, Medium, Hard, Fixed) | 5 levels (Super Light to Heavy) |
| Sound Engine | Pure CF Sound Engine (Yamaha CFX Grand Sample) | SuperNATURAL Piano Sound |
| Polyphony | 256 notes | 256 notes |
| Number of Sounds | 601 instrument voices | 56 instrument voices |
| Grand Piano Sound | Yamaha CFX Concert Grand Sample | Modeled Grand Piano Sound |
| Accompaniment Styles | 260 auto-accompaniment styles | ❌ No accompaniment styles |
| Recording Capability | 16-track MIDI sequencer + Audio recording | 1-track MIDI recorder + Audio recording |
| Speakers | 2 x 6W speakers (12W total) | 2 x 11W speakers (22W total) |
| Speaker Placement | Upward-facing (bass reflex system) | Downward-facing |
| Headphone Output | ✅ Yes (3.5mm jack) | ✅ Yes (Dual 3.5mm & ¼-inch jacks) |
| Line Outputs | ❌ No (only headphone out) | ✅ Yes (dedicated stereo ¼-inch outputs) |
| AUX Input | ✅ Yes (3.5mm) | ❌ No |
| Bluetooth Audio | ✅ Yes (for music playback) | ✅ Yes (for music playback) |
| Bluetooth MIDI | ❌ No | ✅ Yes |
| USB to Host | ✅ Yes (MIDI & Audio) | ✅ Yes (MIDI & Audio) |
| USB to Device | ✅ Yes (WAV file recording) | ✅ Yes (WAV file recording) |
| Pedal Support | Single sustain pedal (included) | Single sustain pedal (included) |
| Triple Pedal Unit | ✅ Yes (LP-1 optional) | ✅ Yes (KPD-70 optional) |
| Half-Damper Pedal | ❌ No (except with LP-1) | ✅ Yes (with DP-10 pedal) |
| LCD Display | ✅ Yes (4.3-inch color screen) | ❌ No screen |
| Music Rest | ✅ Yes (included) | ✅ Yes (included) |
| Weight | 47.3 lbs (21.5 kg) | 32 lbs (14.8 kg) |
| Dimensions (W x D x H) | 55″ x 17.5″ x 5.75″ (without stand) | 51.2″ x 11.2″ x 5.9″ |
| Power Consumption | 16W | 8W |
| Best For | Home use, composers, entertainers | Serious pianists, gigging musicians |
| My individual reviews | Yamaha DGX-670 review | Roland FP-30X review |
Key Takeaways from the Comparison Table
- Yamaha DGX-670 is best for home users, composers, and those wanting auto-accompaniment & extra features.
- Roland FP-30X is best for serious pianists who prioritize realistic touch, sound quality, and portability.
- Roland FP-30X has superior key action and sound modeling, but Yamaha DGX-670 has far more features and instrument sounds.
- DGX-670 lacks Bluetooth MIDI and dedicated stereo outputs, while FP-30X has both—making it better for professional setups.
- DGX-670 is heavier and less portable, while FP-30X is lightweight and gig-friendly.
👉 Recommendation:
- Choose Yamaha DGX-670 if you need arranger features, auto-accompaniment, and an all-in-one entertainment system.
- Choose Roland FP-30X if you want the best piano action, realistic sound, and professional connectivity options.
Design & Build Quality
When choosing a digital piano, design and build quality play a crucial role in usability, portability, and long-term durability. The Yamaha DGX-670 and Roland FP-30X have significantly different design philosophies, catering to distinct user preferences. The DGX-670 leans towards a home-based workstation-style setup, while the FP-30X emphasizes simplicity and portability. Let’s break down their build quality, materials, and overall user experience.
Yamaha DGX-670: A Stylish and Feature-Rich Workstation
The Yamaha DGX-670 is more than just a digital piano—it’s a multi-functional arranger keyboard with a built-in user interface, making it a visually striking and feature-packed instrument.
Aesthetic & Form Factor
- The DGX-670 has a modern yet elegant design, blending rounded edges with a sleek matte finish.
- It comes in two color options—black and white, catering to different home aesthetics.
- The control panel is extensive, featuring buttons, dials, and a 4.3-inch LCD screen, making it look more like a workstation than a standard digital piano.
Materials & Durability
- The body is constructed from high-quality plastic, with a textured finish to minimize fingerprints and dust accumulation.
- While the keys are plastic, the black keys have a matte texture, preventing slippage during extended playing sessions.
- The buttons and rotary dial feel solid, with tactile feedback that adds to the premium feel.
Ergonomics & Usability
- Button Layout: Unlike traditional digital pianos with a minimal interface, the DGX-670 has dedicated buttons for sounds, styles, and functions, making navigation quick and intuitive.
- LCD Screen: The 4.3-inch color display provides real-time feedback, displaying score notation, lyrics, and settings. This is a huge advantage for beginners and intermediate players.
- Music Stand: The included music rest is sturdy and can comfortably hold sheet music, books, or tablets.
- Keybed Integration: The slight indentation on the sides of the keybed allows for comfortable hand positioning during extended playing sessions.
Portability & Assembly
- The DGX-670 weighs 47.3 lbs (21.5 kg), making it one of the heaviest digital pianos in its class.
- It is not designed for frequent transportation—moving it requires two people or a dedicated stand setup.
- Yamaha offers an optional L-300 wooden stand, making it a stylish piece of furniture for home use.
Overall Build Quality Assessment
The DGX-670 is a sturdy, well-built digital piano with a premium feel, though its large size and weight make it less portable. It’s an excellent choice for home users but may not be ideal for gigging musicians who need to frequently transport their instrument.
Roland FP-30X: A Minimalist, Gig-Ready Digital Piano
Unlike the DGX-670, which embraces a workstation-like interface, the Roland FP-30X follows a minimalist stage-piano approach. This makes it sleek, portable, and highly functional for pianists who prioritize a realistic playing experience.
Aesthetic & Form Factor
- The FP-30X is available in black and white, with a simple, no-nonsense design.
- Unlike the DGX-670, it lacks an LCD screen, instead relying on a button-based interface with LED indicators.
- The chassis has a compact, streamlined look, making it ideal for smaller spaces.
Materials & Durability
- The FP-30X is built with high-quality plastic, but its reinforced structure makes it highly durable.
- The keys feature Roland’s signature Ivory Feel, offering a textured surface that enhances grip and comfort.
- The buttons are low-profile and soft-touch, reducing mechanical noise and improving overall durability.
Ergonomics & Usability
- Minimalist Interface: Since the FP-30X lacks an LCD screen, accessing advanced settings requires button combinations, which may take some time to learn.
- Control Simplicity: The limited number of buttons makes operation straightforward but less immediate compared to the DGX-670.
- Music Stand: The included removable music rest is sturdy, though smaller than the DGX-670’s, making it less suitable for large music books.
- Pedal Compatibility: The FP-30X supports Roland’s DP-10 damper pedal and optional triple-pedal units, offering more flexibility for classical pianists.
Portability & Assembly
- The FP-30X weighs only 32 lbs (14.8 kg), making it significantly lighter than the DGX-670.
- This lightweight build makes it ideal for gigging musicians and students who need to transport it between locations.
- It is compatible with Roland’s KSC-70 stand, allowing it to be used as a semi-permanent home setup.
Overall Build Quality Assessment
The FP-30X is one of the most portable and well-built digital pianos in its class. While it lacks an advanced interface like the DGX-670, it compensates with a durable, gig-friendly design that appeals to serious pianists and performers.
Verdict: Which One Has the Better Design & Build Quality?
Now that we’ve analyzed the design, materials, and ergonomics of both pianos, let’s summarize which one is the better choice in different scenarios.
Choose the Yamaha DGX-670 if:
✔ You want an all-in-one workstation-style digital piano with built-in accompaniment, a display screen, and easy access to features.
✔ You plan to keep it at home and don’t need to transport it frequently.
✔ You value an organized control panel with dedicated buttons and an LCD screen for easy navigation.
✔ You prefer a piano that doubles as a powerful arranger keyboard.
Choose the Roland FP-30X if:
✔ You want a sleek, portable, and gig-friendly digital piano that is easy to transport.
✔ You prioritize realistic touch and feel over extra features like accompaniment and LCD screens.
✔ You prefer a simple, minimalist design without distractions.
✔ You need a piano that can integrate seamlessly into a home or stage setup.
Final Thoughts on Build Quality
- The Yamaha DGX-670 is best suited for home users, composers, and hobbyists, offering a feature-rich experience with a sturdy but heavy build.
- The Roland FP-30X is better for serious pianists, gigging musicians, and those needing a lightweight yet durable instrument.
Both pianos are well-built, but their design philosophies cater to different types of players. If you prioritize versatility and features, go for the DGX-670. If you need portability and a superior playing experience, the FP-30X is the better choice.
Keyboard Action & Feel
One of the most critical aspects of a digital piano is its keyboard action and feel, as this directly impacts the playing experience, expression, and technique development. Both the Yamaha DGX-670 and Roland FP-30X offer fully weighted 88-key keyboards, but they use different key action mechanisms, leading to noticeably different playing experiences.
In this section, we’ll analyze:
✅ Key action type (mechanism and weighting)
✅ Key texture & material
✅ Escapement & realism
✅ Touch sensitivity & responsiveness
✅ Dynamic control & expressiveness
Let’s break it down.
Yamaha DGX-670: Graded Hammer Standard (GHS) Action
The DGX-670 features Yamaha’s Graded Hammer Standard (GHS) key action, which is an entry-level fully weighted action found in many Yamaha digital pianos.
Key Action & Weighting
- Graded Hammer Standard (GHS) action means that the keys are heavier in the lower register and lighter in the higher register, mimicking the feel of an acoustic piano.
- While the GHS mechanism is reliable and well-established, it feels slightly lighter and less refined compared to Yamaha’s more premium actions like GH3 or NWX.
- Key movement is smooth, but repetition speed is limited, making fast trills and advanced classical techniques more difficult than on a real acoustic piano.
Key Texture & Material
- The white keys have a glossy plastic finish, which can become slippery after extended play.
- The black keys have a matte finish, which helps reduce finger slippage.
- Compared to higher-end Yamaha models (like the P-515 with wooden keys), the DGX-670’s keybed feels more plasticky and less premium.
Escapement & Realism
- No escapement mechanism—this means that the subtle “notch” you feel when pressing down real acoustic keys slowly is missing.
- While the graded action mimics weight differences across registers, the overall key travel and feel are slightly shallower than an acoustic piano.
Touch Sensitivity & Responsiveness
- The DGX-670 has four levels of touch sensitivity (Soft, Medium, Hard, Fixed), allowing players to adjust dynamics to their playing style.
- Compared to Roland’s PHA-4 action, the DGX-670’s response is less nuanced—it lacks the same level of control over soft and expressive playing.
- Best suited for beginners and intermediate players, but advanced pianists may find it limiting.
Roland FP-30X: PHA-4 Standard Action
The Roland FP-30X is equipped with Roland’s PHA-4 Standard key action, a more advanced and expressive mechanism than Yamaha’s GHS.
Key Action & Weighting
- PHA-4 Standard is a fully weighted, graded hammer action, meaning that the lower register feels heavier while the upper register feels lighter, just like an acoustic piano.
- The key pivot mechanism is longer than GHS, giving a more natural leverage feel when pressing keys near the back.
- The FP-30X’s action is heavier and closer to an acoustic grand piano, making it better suited for advanced pianists.
Key Texture & Material
- The keys feature Roland’s “Ivory Feel” surface, providing a textured grip similar to real ivory.
- The matte finish on both black and white keys prevents slipping, even during extended playing sessions.
- This texture makes the FP-30X feel more like a premium instrument than the DGX-670.
Escapement & Realism
- The FP-30X features an escapement mechanism, replicating the subtle notch felt when pressing real grand piano keys slowly.
- This feature adds realism for classical pianists who are used to grand piano key behavior.
- The escapement is subtle but noticeable, giving the FP-30X a more sophisticated and authentic touch than the DGX-670.
Touch Sensitivity & Responsiveness
- The PHA-4 action allows for a much wider dynamic range, meaning you can control soft pianissimo and loud fortissimo passages more accurately.
- Compared to the DGX-670, the FP-30X responds better to slight touch variations, making it ideal for expressive playing.
- Note repetition is also faster, making the FP-30X a better choice for fast classical and jazz pieces.
Side-by-Side Comparison: Key Action & Feel
| Feature | Yamaha DGX-670 (GHS) | Roland FP-30X (PHA-4 Standard) |
|---|---|---|
| Weighting | Graded, but slightly light | Graded, heavier & more natural |
| Key Material | Glossy white keys, matte black keys | Ivory Feel textured keys |
| Escapement | ❌ No escapement | ✅ Has escapement mechanism |
| Repetition Speed | Slower, not ideal for fast passages | Faster, suitable for advanced playing |
| Dynamic Control | Decent, but lacks fine sensitivity | More expressive & nuanced |
| Realism | Feels slightly artificial | Feels closer to an acoustic piano |
Who Should Choose Which?
Choose the Yamaha DGX-670 if:
✔ You’re a beginner or intermediate player looking for a comfortable weighted action.
✔ You prefer a lighter key touch, which may be easier for extended play sessions.
✔ You want a more affordable digital piano without requiring a highly advanced key action.
Choose the Roland FP-30X if:
✔ You’re an intermediate or advanced pianist who needs realistic hammer action.
✔ You play classical, jazz, or expressive music that requires detailed dynamic control.
✔ You want an authentic acoustic feel, including escapement and textured keys.
Final Verdict: Which Keyboard Action is Better?
Both Yamaha’s GHS and Roland’s PHA-4 Standard are fully weighted, but the PHA-4 action in the FP-30X is clearly superior in terms of realism, responsiveness, and playing experience.
- If you want a comfortable and functional action suitable for beginners, the Yamaha DGX-670 is decent.
- If you want a digital piano that closely mimics a real acoustic instrument, the Roland FP-30X is the clear winner.
🎹 For realism, expressiveness, and long-term skill development, the Roland FP-30X wins this category.
Sound Quality & Tone Engines
Sound quality is the heart of any digital piano. Whether you’re playing classical pieces, jazz improvisations, or pop arrangements, the way an instrument produces, sustains, and projects sound greatly influences your playing experience.
The Yamaha DGX-670 and Roland FP-30X employ different sound engines, sampling technologies, and resonance modeling techniques, resulting in two distinct sonic experiences. In this section, we’ll analyze:
✅ Sound engine technology (sampling vs. modeling)
✅ Tonal characteristics & realism
✅ Polyphony & sound layering
✅ Resonance modeling & expressiveness
✅ Customization options & effects
Let’s break it down.
Yamaha DGX-670: Pure CF Sound Engine with CFX Grand Sampling
Yamaha is renowned for its acoustic pianos, and the DGX-670 inherits the premium Yamaha CFX grand piano sound, sampled from one of Yamaha’s flagship concert grand pianos.
Sound Engine & Sampling Technology
- The DGX-670 uses Yamaha’s Pure CF Sound Engine, which is based on high-quality stereo samples of real acoustic pianos.
- The CFX grand piano sample is bright, detailed, and crisp, making it well-suited for classical, contemporary, and pop music.
- Unlike Roland’s SuperNATURAL engine, which blends sampling and modeling, the DGX-670 is purely sample-based, meaning each note is recorded at multiple velocities for a more natural sound.
Polyphony & Sound Layering
- The DGX-670 offers 256-note polyphony, ensuring that even the most complex pieces with sustained notes and layered effects do not cut off.
- Dual and Split modes allow you to combine two instrument voices (e.g., piano & strings) or split the keyboard for different sounds in each hand.
Resonance & Expressiveness
- Yamaha’s Virtual Resonance Modeling (VRM) Lite attempts to simulate the way real strings resonate when certain notes are played.
- While VRM Lite is a step above static sampling, it is not as detailed as Roland’s full resonance modeling.
- String resonance, damper resonance, and key-off samples add to realism, but are not as customizable as Roland’s settings.
Additional Tones & Sound Variety
- The DGX-670 is not just a piano—it’s an arranger keyboard, offering 601 voices across pianos, organs, synths, orchestral instruments, guitars, and more.
- Super Articulation Voices (SA) enhance realism, particularly for instruments like guitars and woodwinds, by adding realistic techniques such as string slides, breaths, and harmonics.
Genre Suitability
- 🎼 Best for classical & pop – The bright CFX grand tone is fantastic for solo piano performances, especially in classical and contemporary styles.
- 🎸 Great for composers & songwriters – With 600+ sounds, you can easily create backing tracks and experiment with different instrument combinations.
- 🎤 Best for vocalists – The microphone input with vocal effects makes it ideal for singer-songwriters.
Roland FP-30X: SuperNATURAL Piano Engine with Advanced Modeling
Roland has pioneered modeling technology, and the FP-30X features their signature SuperNATURAL sound engine, which blends sampling and digital modeling to create a more organic and responsive sound.
Sound Engine & Modeling Technology
- The FP-30X’s SuperNATURAL engine is more advanced than Yamaha’s sample-based approach, using both recorded samples and digital modeling.
- Unlike static samples, SuperNATURAL dynamically adjusts tone based on playing dynamics, making soft and loud notes transition more smoothly.
- The result? A more natural and organic tone, especially in expressive classical and jazz playing.
Polyphony & Sound Layering
- The FP-30X offers 256-note polyphony, the same as the DGX-670, meaning even complex pieces can be played without dropped notes.
- Dual and Split modes allow for layered sounds or independent sounds in each hand.
Resonance & Expressiveness
- The FP-30X features full resonance modeling, unlike the DGX-670, which uses a simplified version (VRM Lite).
- Simulated string resonance, damper resonance, and key-off resonance give a realistic grand piano experience.
- More dynamic range – subtle variations in touch result in more expressive control over dynamics.
Additional Tones & Sound Variety
- The FP-30X includes 56 high-quality voices, focusing on pianos, electric pianos, strings, organs, and pads.
- Fewer voices than the DGX-670, but each sound is higher quality and more detailed.
Genre Suitability
- 🎼 Best for classical & jazz – The organic, natural sound of SuperNATURAL modeling makes this piano fantastic for expressive solo piano playing.
- 🎹 Best for purists – If you only need a realistic piano tone without the distraction of extra features, the FP-30X is the better choice.
- 🎷 Ideal for jazz musicians – The expressive sound modeling allows for nuanced control of soft and loud dynamics.
Side-by-Side Comparison: Sound Quality & Tone Engines
| Feature | Yamaha DGX-670 (Pure CF) | Roland FP-30X (SuperNATURAL) |
|---|---|---|
| Sound Engine | Sample-based | Sample + modeling |
| Grand Piano Sample | Yamaha CFX Concert Grand | Modeled Grand with real-time dynamics |
| Polyphony | 256 notes | 256 notes |
| Resonance Modeling | VRM Lite (basic) | Full resonance modeling |
| Extra Sounds | 601 tones | 56 tones |
| Sound Customization | Limited | More adjustable |
| Best for | Arranger users, pop/classical, singer-songwriters | Pure piano players, classical, jazz |
Which Piano Has the Better Sound?
🎹 Choose the Yamaha DGX-670 if:
✔ You need hundreds of sounds and backing accompaniments.
✔ You like a bright, detailed concert grand sound (Yamaha CFX).
✔ You want an arranger keyboard with Super Articulation voices.
✔ You plan to play pop, contemporary, or singer-songwriter music.
🎼 Choose the Roland FP-30X if:
✔ You want a pure, expressive piano experience.
✔ You value real-time sound modeling with dynamic variation.
✔ You play classical or jazz, where touch-sensitive expression is key.
✔ You prefer fewer but higher-quality tones over quantity.
Final Verdict: Which Piano Sounds Better?
- If you want the best overall piano tone and realism, the Roland FP-30X wins.
- If you need versatility, tons of sounds, and backing features, the Yamaha DGX-670 is the better choice.
Speakers & Amplification
The built-in speakers of a digital piano are crucial, especially for home practice, casual performances, and even small gatherings. They determine how the piano sounds in a room, how well bass notes resonate, and whether you need external amplification for a fuller sound.
Both the Yamaha DGX-670 and Roland FP-30X come with built-in speaker systems, but their design, placement, and power output differ significantly, making each piano better suited for different environments.
In this section, we’ll analyze:
✅ Speaker size & placement
✅ Amplification power & volume levels
✅ Bass response & stereo imaging
✅ Suitability for home vs. stage use
Let’s compare.
Yamaha DGX-670: A Well-Balanced, Home-Friendly Sound System
The DGX-670 is designed as a feature-rich home digital piano, and its speaker system reflects this focus.
Speaker Design & Placement
- The DGX-670 is equipped with two built-in speakers, positioned at the left and right sides of the instrument.
- Each speaker is housed in a bass-reflex enclosure, which enhances low-end response, making bass notes sound fuller.
- The speakers face upwards, which helps create a more immersive stereo effect when playing in a room.
Amplification & Power Output
- 12W total output (6W per speaker), which is decent for home practice but not as powerful as some stage pianos.
- The amplification system is optimized for Yamaha’s Pure CF sound engine, making the CFX grand piano sample sound warm and detailed.
- Ideal for personal use, but not powerful enough for large performances without external speakers.
Sound Projection & Stereo Imaging
- Thanks to Virtual Resonance Modeling (VRM) Lite, the DGX-670’s speakers create a wider stereo image, simulating the way sound disperses from an acoustic piano.
- The bass reflex system prevents the speakers from sounding thin, making low notes resonate more naturally.
- Not as powerful as Roland’s FP-30X speakers, but the sound remains clear and well-balanced for home use.
Best Use Cases
✔ Perfect for home use, where its built-in speakers provide an immersive experience.
✔ Great for casual performances in small rooms.
❌ Not ideal for gigging musicians, as the speakers are not powerful enough for live performances.
Roland FP-30X: Compact Yet Surprisingly Powerful Speakers
The Roland FP-30X is designed for portability, but it packs one of the most powerful built-in speaker systems in its class.
Speaker Design & Placement
- The FP-30X also has two speakers, but they are positioned at the bottom of the instrument, facing downward.
- Unlike the DGX-670’s upward-facing speakers, the downward placement helps project sound outward, making it more suitable for larger spaces.
- Since the speakers are on the underside, sound dispersion improves when placed on a solid surface or a dedicated stand (instead of on a soft bed or table, where sound absorption may occur).
Amplification & Power Output
- 22W total output (11W per speaker), making it significantly more powerful than the DGX-670 (12W total).
- The FP-30X’s speakers have a deeper bass response, thanks to Roland’s SuperNATURAL sound processing.
- More volume headroom, making it loud enough for small gigs or rehearsals without needing external amplification.
Sound Projection & Stereo Imaging
- The FP-30X’s speakers deliver a strong, bass-heavy response, making it ideal for realistic grand piano sound reproduction.
- Because of Roland’s resonance modeling, the speakers enhance realism, especially when using the SuperNATURAL piano tones.
- Better sound dispersion for live settings compared to the DGX-670, especially in larger rooms or halls.
Best Use Cases
✔ Great for gigging musicians who need a portable piano with built-in powerful speakers.
✔ Perfect for serious pianists who need a more expressive and resonant sound.
✔ Can handle small performances without external speakers, thanks to its higher 22W output.
Side-by-Side Comparison: Speakers & Amplification
| Feature | Yamaha DGX-670 | Roland FP-30X |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Speakers | 2 | 2 |
| Speaker Placement | Upward-facing | Downward-facing |
| Total Power Output | 12W (6W x 2) | 22W (11W x 2) |
| Bass Response | Enhanced by bass reflex enclosures | Stronger, more natural bass |
| Stereo Imaging | Good, thanks to VRM Lite | Better for wider sound projection |
| Ideal for | Home use, casual performances | Gigging, home, small performances |
| External Amplification Needed? | Yes, for larger venues | Less likely, thanks to higher power |
Which Piano Has the Better Speaker System?
Both Yamaha DGX-670 and Roland FP-30X offer good built-in speaker systems, but they serve different purposes:
🎹 Choose the Yamaha DGX-670 if:
✔ You want a home-based digital piano with immersive stereo imaging.
✔ You primarily play at home and don’t need high-volume output.
✔ You prefer a well-balanced sound with smooth bass reflex technology.
🎼 Choose the Roland FP-30X if:
✔ You need more power for rehearsals and small performances.
✔ You want better sound projection with deeper bass response.
✔ You play classical or expressive music, where a richer resonance enhances the experience.
Final Verdict: Which Speakers Are Better?
- If you need a warm, detailed home piano sound, the Yamaha DGX-670 is great.
- If you need more volume and a gig-friendly sound system, the Roland FP-30X is superior.
Features & Functions
Beyond just sound and touch, digital pianos often come with extra features that enhance the playing experience, whether through built-in rhythms, recording tools, connectivity, or learning functions.
The Yamaha DGX-670 and Roland FP-30X cater to different types of players. While the DGX-670 is a feature-packed arranger piano, the FP-30X takes a minimalist approach, focusing more on pure piano playability rather than extra tools.
In this section, we’ll analyze:
✅ Accompaniment & rhythm features
✅ Recording & playback functions
✅ Customization options
✅ Learning tools & educational features
✅ Unique extra functions
Yamaha DGX-670: A Feature-Rich Arranger Keyboard
The DGX-670 is more than just a digital piano—it’s a full-fledged arranger workstation, equipped with auto-accompaniment, hundreds of sounds, and multiple performance tools.
1. Auto-Accompaniment & Backing Tracks
- 260 accompaniment styles that provide real-time backing bands.
- You can play chords with your left hand, and the keyboard will generate drums, bass, and harmonies accordingly.
- Styles range from pop, rock, jazz, blues, EDM, classical orchestration, and world music.
- Features like Smart Chord & Adaptive Style allow beginners to create complex-sounding music with simple inputs.
- Perfect for solo performers, songwriters, and home entertainers.
2. Recording & Playback Features
- MIDI Recording: Record and save your performances as MIDI files, allowing for later editing.
- Audio Recording: Save performances in WAV format directly to a USB flash drive.
- 16-Track MIDI Sequencer: Record multiple instrumental layers to create full compositions.
- Play-Along Capabilities: Load external MIDI songs and mute specific tracks to play along with backing arrangements.
3. Customization & Sound Editing
- Dual Mode: Layer two sounds together (e.g., piano + strings).
- Split Mode: Play different sounds in each hand (e.g., bass in the left, piano in the right).
- DSP Effects: Built-in digital signal processing adds reverb, chorus, delay, EQ, and rotary speaker effects.
- Microphone Input & Vocal Effects: Sing along with reverb, chorus, harmony, and compression options.
4. Learning Tools & Educational Features
- Score Display: Shows notation on the LCD screen for educational purposes.
- Chord Display: Helps beginners learn real-time chord names while playing.
- Yamaha’s Smart Chord: Generates full harmonies with single-finger chords, helping beginners play complex pieces.
- Built-in Metronome & Tempo Adjustments: Essential for timing practice.
5. Unique Extra Functions
- Bluetooth Audio: Stream music wirelessly from a smartphone and play along with backing tracks.
- USB to Host & USB to Device: Connect to a computer for recording and MIDI integration.
- Wireless Connectivity with Yamaha Apps: Integrates with Yamaha’s Smart Pianist app for chord analysis and customization.
- Compatible with Yamaha’s Triple Pedal Unit (LP-1): Allows for half-pedal functionality, adding realism to sustain control.
Roland FP-30X: Focused on Piano Performance
The FP-30X takes a different approach, emphasizing simplicity and core piano functions rather than extensive accompaniment and effects.
1. No Arranger or Auto-Accompaniment Features
- Unlike the DGX-670, the FP-30X does not include auto-accompaniment or a built-in rhythm section.
- Focuses on a purist piano experience, making it ideal for serious pianists who don’t need backing tracks.
- Better suited for those who want a distraction-free playing experience.
2. Recording & Playback Features
- MIDI Recording: You can record MIDI performances internally and export them via USB.
- Audio Recording: Supports WAV audio recording to USB drives.
- Basic One-Track Recorder: Unlike the DGX-670’s 16-track sequencer, the FP-30X only records one track at a time.
- Metronome & Rhythm Accompaniment: Includes basic drum patterns, but no full backing arrangements.
3. Sound Customization & Editing
- Dual Mode: Layer two sounds together (e.g., piano + strings).
- Split Mode: Assign different sounds to each hand.
- Ambience Effects: Adjust room acoustics, reverb, and EQ settings for a more personalized tone.
- Touch Sensitivity Adjustments: Customize the dynamic response of the keys.
4. Learning & Educational Features
- Twin Piano Mode: Splits the keyboard into two identical pitch ranges, ideal for teacher-student lessons.
- Bluetooth MIDI & Audio: Unlike the DGX-670, the FP-30X includes Bluetooth MIDI, allowing for wireless connection to piano learning apps like Flowkey, Simply Piano, and Roland’s Piano Partner 2.
- Basic Chord Recognition: Displays chord names but doesn’t have an interactive chord learning system like the DGX-670.
5. Unique Extra Functions
- Bluetooth MIDI & Audio: Supports wireless MIDI transmission, making it easy to connect to DAWs and learning apps.
- USB to Host & USB to Device: Allows recording to a computer or external drive.
- Dedicated Stereo Outputs: Unlike the DGX-670, the FP-30X has ¼-inch stereo outputs, making it better for gigging musicians who need to connect to PA systems.
- Compatible with Roland’s Triple Pedal Unit (KPD-70): Allows for soft, sostenuto, and damper pedal functionality.
Side-by-Side Comparison: Features & Functions
| Feature | Yamaha DGX-670 | Roland FP-30X |
|---|---|---|
| Auto-Accompaniment | ✅ Yes, 260 styles | ❌ No |
| Recording Capability | ✅ 16-track MIDI sequencer | ❌ Basic one-track MIDI |
| Audio Recording | ✅ WAV to USB | ✅ WAV to USB |
| Sound Customization | ✅ DSP Effects, EQ, layer/split | ✅ Reverb, EQ, layer/split |
| Bluetooth Audio | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Bluetooth MIDI | ❌ No | ✅ Yes |
| Educational Tools | ✅ Score Display, Smart Chord | ✅ Twin Piano Mode |
| Pedal Compatibility | ✅ Yamaha LP-1 (triple pedal) | ✅ Roland KPD-70 (triple pedal) |
| USB Connectivity | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Best For | Songwriters, home users, casual performers | Classical & serious pianists, gigging musicians |
Which Piano Has Better Features?
🎹 Choose the Yamaha DGX-670 if:
✔ You want arranger-style accompaniment and a built-in backing band.
✔ You need a multi-functional instrument for songwriting & entertainment.
✔ You prefer an interactive screen for navigation and music display.
🎼 Choose the Roland FP-30X if:
✔ You prioritize pure piano performance without distractions.
✔ You want Bluetooth MIDI for wireless connection to learning apps.
✔ You need stereo outputs for stage and recording setups.
Final Verdict: Which Piano Wins?
- For overall features & versatility, the Yamaha DGX-670 wins.
- For a focused, professional playing experience, the Roland FP-30X is better.
Connectivity & Expansion Options
In today’s digital world, a piano’s connectivity options play a crucial role in its overall functionality. Whether you’re using the instrument for home practice, studio recording, live performances, or interactive learning, the availability of ports, Bluetooth compatibility, and expansion options can greatly impact the overall experience.
The Yamaha DGX-670 and Roland FP-30X cater to different types of users, and their connectivity features reflect their design philosophies. The DGX-670 is geared toward home use and composition, whereas the FP-30X is optimized for pianists needing flexible connections for stage and studio setups.
In this section, we’ll analyze:
✅ USB & MIDI integration
✅ Bluetooth capabilities (MIDI & audio)
✅ Audio input & output options
✅ Pedal expansion possibilities
✅ Overall flexibility & expandability
Yamaha DGX-670: Versatile Home & Studio Connectivity
The DGX-670 is designed as a multi-purpose digital piano, meaning its connectivity is optimized for home use, learning, and recording rather than live performance.
1. USB & MIDI Integration
- USB to Host: Allows for MIDI and audio data transmission between the DGX-670 and a computer, tablet, or DAW (Digital Audio Workstation).
- USB to Device: Enables direct recording to a USB flash drive in WAV format, useful for saving performances without needing a computer.
- No traditional 5-pin MIDI ports—all MIDI functions are handled via USB, meaning that users may need a USB-MIDI adapter if working with older MIDI hardware.
2. Bluetooth Capabilities
- Bluetooth Audio (Yes): Allows for wireless streaming of music from a phone or tablet, useful for playing along with backing tracks.
- Bluetooth MIDI (No): Unlike the FP-30X, the DGX-670 does not support Bluetooth MIDI, meaning that wireless MIDI control with apps or DAWs is not possible.
- Workaround: Users needing Bluetooth MIDI can use a separate Bluetooth MIDI adapter (such as Yamaha’s MD-BT01).
3. Audio Input & Output Options
- Headphone Output (Yes): A stereo 3.5mm headphone jack allows for silent practice.
- AUX Input (Yes): A 3.5mm AUX input lets users connect external audio sources (smartphones, MP3 players, etc.) to play along with music.
- No Dedicated Line Outputs: The DGX-670 does not have standard ¼-inch line outputs, which can be an issue for gigging musicians needing to connect to PA systems or external speakers.
- Workaround: Users can use a stereo headphone-to-line converter if they need to connect to an amplifier or mixer.
4. Pedal Expansion Possibilities
- Sustain Pedal Input (Yes): A standard ¼-inch sustain pedal input allows connection of a single damper pedal.
- Triple Pedal Unit Compatibility (Yes): Compatible with Yamaha’s LP-1 triple pedal unit, allowing for soft, sostenuto, and sustain functionality.
- No Half-Damper Support with Standard Pedals: Half-pedaling is only possible when using Yamaha’s proprietary triple pedal unit.
5. Overall Flexibility & Expandability
✔ Excellent for home use and personal recording, thanks to USB connectivity & audio recording features.
✔ Good for learning, as it supports interactive Yamaha apps.
❌ Not ideal for gigging, due to lack of dedicated line outputs.
❌ Limited MIDI expandability, since Bluetooth MIDI is absent.
Roland FP-30X: Studio & Stage-Ready Connectivity
The Roland FP-30X is designed with performance and flexibility in mind, making it a better choice for gigging musicians and advanced pianists needing MIDI control and external amplification.
1. USB & MIDI Integration
- USB to Host: Allows for MIDI and audio communication with computers and tablets, making it seamless for recording and DAW integration.
- USB to Device: Enables direct recording to a USB flash drive (WAV format), similar to the DGX-670.
- No Traditional 5-pin MIDI Ports, but Bluetooth MIDI compensates for this lack.
2. Bluetooth Capabilities
- Bluetooth Audio (Yes): Just like the DGX-670, the FP-30X supports wireless music streaming from phones or tablets.
- Bluetooth MIDI (Yes): Unlike the DGX-670, the FP-30X includes Bluetooth MIDI, allowing:
- Wireless connection to DAWs like Logic, Ableton, and GarageBand.
- Wireless compatibility with learning apps like Flowkey, Simply Piano, and Roland’s Piano Partner 2.
- MIDI transmission without extra cables or adapters.
3. Audio Input & Output Options
- Headphone Output (Yes): Dual ¼-inch and 3.5mm headphone jacks for silent practice.
- AUX Input (No): Unlike the DGX-670, the FP-30X does not have an AUX input for playing external music.
- Dedicated ¼-inch Stereo Line Outputs (Yes): Unlike the DGX-670, the FP-30X has proper stereo ¼-inch outputs, making it easy to connect to amplifiers, mixers, or PA systems.
- Best for gigging musicians and studio setups needing clean external sound output.
4. Pedal Expansion Possibilities
- Sustain Pedal Input (Yes): Supports standard ¼-inch damper pedals.
- Triple Pedal Unit Compatibility (Yes): Compatible with Roland’s KPD-70 triple pedal unit, allowing for soft, sostenuto, and sustain control.
- Half-Damper Support (Yes): Unlike the DGX-670, the FP-30X supports half-damper functionality with Roland’s DP-10 pedal, making it better for expressive piano playing.
5. Overall Flexibility & Expandability
✔ Best for gigging musicians, thanks to dedicated stereo outputs & Bluetooth MIDI.
✔ Ideal for pianists who want seamless wireless MIDI connectivity.
❌ Lacks an AUX input, meaning you can’t directly connect an external audio source.
❌ Less ideal for composers needing extensive arranger features.
Side-by-Side Comparison: Connectivity & Expansion
| Feature | Yamaha DGX-670 | Roland FP-30X |
|---|---|---|
| USB to Host | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| USB to Device | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Bluetooth Audio | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Bluetooth MIDI | ❌ No | ✅ Yes |
| AUX Input | ✅ Yes | ❌ No |
| Dedicated Stereo Outputs | ❌ No | ✅ Yes |
| Sustain Pedal Input | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Triple Pedal Compatibility | ✅ Yes (LP-1) | ✅ Yes (KPD-70) |
| Half-Damper Support | ❌ No (except with LP-1) | ✅ Yes (with DP-10 pedal) |
| Best For | Home users, composers | Gigging, studio use |
Final Verdict: Which Piano Has Better Connectivity?
🎹 Choose the Yamaha DGX-670 if:
✔ You need AUX input for external music playback.
✔ You primarily use USB for MIDI/audio recording.
🎼 Choose the Roland FP-30X if:
✔ You need Bluetooth MIDI for wireless control.
✔ You play live and need dedicated stereo outputs.
👉 For studio and performance flexibility, the Roland FP-30X wins.
👉 For home and arranger-focused features, the Yamaha DGX-670 is better.
Value for Money & Final Verdict
When purchasing a digital piano, it’s important to consider not only the features and performance but also the long-term value it offers. The Yamaha DGX-670 and Roland FP-30X fall into different price categories and serve different kinds of musicians, making this comparison essential for buyers deciding between the two.
In this section, we’ll analyze:
✅ Price comparison (initial cost & optional accessories)
✅ Who gets the best value from each piano
✅ Feature-to-price ratio (which offers more for the money?)
✅ Longevity & future-proofing (which piano will last longer in terms of usability?)
✅ Resale value & upgradability
✅ Final verdict: which piano is the better buy?
1. Price Comparison: Initial Cost & Accessories
The Yamaha DGX-670 and Roland FP-30X are priced within the $750–$1300 range, depending on optional stands, pedals, and accessories.
Current Price Estimates
- Yamaha DGX-670: ~$850 (without stand), ~$1,100 (with stand & triple pedal unit)
- Roland FP-30X: ~$750 (without stand), ~$950 (with stand & triple pedal unit)
What’s Included in the Box?
| Item | Yamaha DGX-670 | Roland FP-30X |
|---|---|---|
| Keyboard Only | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Power Adapter | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Sustain Pedal | ✅ Yes (basic footswitch) | ✅ Yes (DP-2, basic footswitch) |
| Music Rest | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Stand (Optional) | ❌ No (L-300 stand sold separately) | ❌ No (KSC-70 stand sold separately) |
| Triple Pedal Unit (Optional) | ❌ No (LP-1 pedal sold separately) | ❌ No (KPD-70 pedal sold separately) |
- Both models include a basic sustain pedal, but for a more realistic playing experience, users will likely need to purchase a triple pedal unit separately.
- The Yamaha DGX-670’s stand (L-300) and triple pedal unit (LP-1) add about $250 to the total cost.
- The Roland FP-30X’s stand (KSC-70) and triple pedal unit (KPD-70) add about $200.
Hidden Costs to Consider
💰 Speakers/Amplifiers – The Roland FP-30X has dedicated line outputs, making it easier to use with external speakers. If you plan to use the Yamaha DGX-670 for live performance, you may need a DI box or external amp.
💰 Bluetooth MIDI Adapter – Since the DGX-670 lacks Bluetooth MIDI, you may need to buy an external Bluetooth MIDI adapter (~$50) if you want wireless app integration.
2. Who Gets the Best Value?
Value depends on who’s buying the piano and what they need it for. Let’s analyze different user types.
Beginners & Hobbyists
- Yamaha DGX-670 is better for beginners who want extra features like auto-accompaniment, rhythm tracks, and a visual learning system.
- Roland FP-30X is better for beginners who want to focus on a traditional piano experience with realistic touch and sound.
Songwriters & Composers
- Yamaha DGX-670 wins here, thanks to its 601 voices, built-in accompaniments, recording features, and microphone input.
- If you need a piano for arranging or home recording, the DGX-670 is the better option.
Gigging Musicians & Performers
- Roland FP-30X is the better choice, as it has dedicated stereo outputs for stage performances, while the DGX-670 lacks proper line outputs.
- The FP-30X’s portability makes it easier to transport than the heavier DGX-670.
Classical & Jazz Pianists
- Roland FP-30X wins, thanks to its PHA-4 Standard key action, superior key texture, escapement mechanism, and half-damper support.
- The Yamaha DGX-670’s GHS action feels more beginner-friendly but lacks the nuanced control needed for advanced piano pieces.
3. Feature-to-Price Ratio: Which Offers More?
| Feature | Yamaha DGX-670 | Roland FP-30X |
|---|---|---|
| Key Action | GHS (Entry-Level) | PHA-4 Standard (Superior) |
| Piano Sound Engine | Pure CF w/ CFX sample | SuperNATURAL Modeling |
| Polyphony | 256 notes | 256 notes |
| Speaker Power | 12W | 22W |
| Auto-Accompaniment | ✅ Yes | ❌ No |
| Bluetooth Audio | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Bluetooth MIDI | ❌ No | ✅ Yes |
| Recording Features | ✅ 16-track MIDI | ❌ Basic one-track MIDI |
| Connectivity (Line Outs) | ❌ No (only headphone out) | ✅ Yes |
| Best For | Songwriters, hobbyists | Serious pianists, gigging musicians |
👉 If you want maximum features per dollar, the DGX-670 wins.
👉 If you want the best piano touch and sound for the money, the FP-30X wins.
4. Longevity & Resale Value
Digital pianos should be considered long-term investments. Here’s how they compare:
- DGX-670’s features might become outdated sooner because technology changes quickly in arranger keyboards.
- FP-30X’s superior key action ensures longevity, making it a solid choice for pianists progressing in skill.
- Resale Value: Roland FP-series pianos tend to hold their value better, as they are used by serious musicians.
👉 For longevity, the Roland FP-30X is a better investment.
Final Verdict: Which Piano is the Better Buy?
🎹 Buy the Yamaha DGX-670 if:
✔ You want a feature-packed digital piano for home use.
✔ You are a songwriter or arranger needing hundreds of instrument voices.
✔ You prefer built-in accompaniment, vocal processing, and a full entertainment system.
🎼 Buy the Roland FP-30X if:
✔ You need the best piano touch and sound under $1000.
✔ You want a portable, stage-ready instrument with stereo outputs.
✔ You prefer a minimalist, distraction-free piano experience.
Which One Wins?
- For beginners & casual players → Yamaha DGX-670
- For serious pianists & performers → Roland FP-30X
If you’re looking for a “digital piano plus extras”, the Yamaha DGX-670 offers incredible versatility. If you just want a great piano, the Roland FP-30X is the clear winner.
👉 Final Recommendation: The Roland FP-30X is the better long-term investment for serious pianists, while the DGX-670 is the better option for home-based musicians who want extra features.