If you’re in the market for an affordable, beginner-friendly digital piano, two models that likely caught your attention are the Yamaha P-143 and the Roland FP-10. Both are entry-level 88-key digital pianos designed for students, hobbyists, and even more advanced players looking for a realistic piano feel without spending a fortune. But how do they compare, and which one is the better choice for you?
The Yamaha P-143 is the successor to the popular P-45, bringing an upgraded sound engine and a more compact design. Yamaha is well known for its bright, clear piano tones, and the P-143 continues that tradition while keeping things lightweight and minimalist. On the other hand, the Roland FP-10 is part of Roland’s well-respected FP series, offering a warmer, richer sound with the highly regarded PHA-4 Standard key action, often praised as one of the best in this price range.
At first glance, these two pianos appear quite similar, both targeting the same audience and price point. However, they have key differences in areas such as keyboard action, sound realism, speaker quality, features, and connectivity. In this in-depth review, I’ll analyze every aspect of these two digital pianos, breaking down their strengths and weaknesses to help you decide which one best suits your needs.
Let’s dive into the details and see which digital piano comes out on top! 🎹
Yamaha P-143 vs Roland FP-10 Comparison Chart
| Feature | Yamaha P-143 | Roland FP-10 |
|---|---|---|
 |  | |
| Check the best price on Amazon | Check the best price on Amazon | |
| Key Action | Graded Hammer Standard (GHS) | PHA-4 Standard with Escapement & Ivory Feel |
| Key Texture | Glossy plastic | Textured ivory-feel keys |
| Escapement Mechanism | No | Yes |
| Sound Engine | Simplified CFX Sampling | SuperNATURAL Modeling |
| Polyphony | 64 notes | 96 notes |
| Number of Voices | 10 | 15 |
| Speakers | 6W x 2 (Downward-facing) | 6W x 2 (Downward-facing) |
| Sound Quality | Bright and clear | Warm and expressive |
| Metronome | Yes | Yes |
| Dual Mode (Layering Sounds) | Yes | Yes |
| Duo Mode (Twin Piano Mode) | Yes | Yes |
| Split Mode | No | No |
| Built-in Songs | Yes (10 demo songs) | No |
| Recording Function | No | No |
| USB MIDI | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth MIDI | No | Yes |
| Audio Outputs (Line Out) | No | No |
| Headphone Jack | Yes (1/4″ TRS) | Yes (1/4″ TRS) |
| Sustain Pedal Input | Yes (basic footswitch included) | Yes (basic footswitch included) |
| Half-Damper Pedal Support | No | No |
| Weight | 24.5 lbs (11.1 kg) | 28 lbs (12.3 kg) |
| Dimensions (W x D x H) | 52.1″ x 10.2″ x 4.1″ | 50.8″ x 10.1″ x 5.5″ |
| Overall Winner | – | Roland FP-10 |
| My individual reviews | Yamaha P-143 review | Roland FP-10 review |
Final Verdict
- The Roland FP-10 is the superior choice overall, with better key action, richer sound, higher polyphony, and Bluetooth MIDI.
- The Yamaha P-143 is slightly more compact and lightweight, making it a good option if portability is a top priority.
- If you want the best playing experience at this price range, the Roland FP-10 is the clear winner.
Design & Build Quality
When choosing a digital piano, design and build quality are crucial factors that affect portability, durability, aesthetics, and overall usability. Both the Yamaha P-143 and Roland FP-10 are compact, entry-level digital pianos designed with simplicity in mind, but they take different approaches in terms of build materials, size, weight, and overall user experience. In this section, we’ll take an in-depth look at their dimensions, weight, build quality, control layout, portability, and overall design philosophy to help you determine which one suits your needs better.
Yamaha P-143: Slim, Minimalist, and Lightweight
Yamaha has always been known for producing sleek and minimalist digital pianos, and the P-143 follows that tradition. It’s designed to be a direct successor to the Yamaha P-45, improving on some aspects while keeping the overall footprint small and lightweight.
Dimensions & Weight
- Width: 52.1 inches (132.3 cm)
- Depth: 10.2 inches (25.8 cm)
- Height: 4.1 inches (10.4 cm)
- Weight: 24.5 lbs (11.1 kg)
This makes the P-143 one of the most compact and lightweight 88-key digital pianos on the market. Compared to its predecessor, the P-45, it has an even more streamlined form factor. The reduced size and weight make it ideal for musicians who need portability, whether you’re frequently moving it between rooms, taking it to lessons, or even using it for gigging.
Build Quality & Materials
The P-143 is made of matte plastic, which is standard at this price point. While it doesn’t feel particularly premium, it is sturdy enough for regular home use. However, one area where the P-143 feels a bit lacking is the keybed frame, which has a slight flex if you apply pressure. It’s not a dealbreaker, but it does remind you that this is a budget-friendly instrument.
One notable downgrade from the P-45 is the lack of dedicated function buttons. Instead of having separate buttons for functions like metronome, transpose, and voice selection, Yamaha has opted for a single-button interface where you have to use key combinations. This can be frustrating, especially for beginners who may not remember all the shortcuts.
Aesthetic & Design Philosophy
Visually, the Yamaha P-143 follows Yamaha’s signature design approach: sleek, simple, and professional-looking. The black matte finish gives it a modern feel, while the red accent lining above the keys adds a subtle but stylish touch. There’s nothing flashy about it, but it looks elegant in any setting.
Overall, the Yamaha P-143 is a great option for those who value portability and a clean, minimalistic look, but its ultra-lightweight build does come at the cost of slightly less durability compared to the Roland FP-10.
Roland FP-10: Compact, Sturdy, and Feature-Rich
The Roland FP-10 takes a slightly different approach from the P-143. While it’s still designed as a compact entry-level digital piano, it feels more solidly built and offers a few more physical controls.
Dimensions & Weight
- Width: 50.8 inches (129 cm)
- Depth: 10.1 inches (25.6 cm)
- Height: 5.5 inches (14 cm)
- Weight: 28 lbs (12.3 kg)
Despite being slightly shorter in width than the Yamaha P-143, the FP-10 is a little thicker and heavier. This added weight gives it a more substantial feel, which many players appreciate, as it feels more like a serious instrument rather than a lightweight keyboard.
Build Quality & Materials
The FP-10 is constructed from high-quality plastic, but it has a noticeably more rigid and durable feel compared to the P-143. One major improvement is the keybed stability—unlike the P-143, the FP-10’s keys are better supported and don’t flex under pressure.
The buttons and interface also feel more robust, with a dedicated volume knob instead of Yamaha’s button-based control. While the FP-10 still requires some key combinations for advanced settings, its interface is slightly more user-friendly than Yamaha’s.
Another standout feature is the built-in Bluetooth connectivity, which allows seamless connection to learning apps, DAWs, and MIDI software without needing extra cables. This makes it a more future-proof option for musicians who want to integrate their digital piano with modern technology.
Aesthetic & Design Philosophy
The Roland FP-10 has a minimalist yet slightly more industrial design. The rounded edges and matte black finish make it look clean and professional, while the sturdier chassis adds to its overall appeal. There’s a sense of reliability in its design, making it feel more like a musician’s instrument rather than a beginner’s keyboard.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | Yamaha P-143 | Roland FP-10 |
|---|---|---|
| Width | 52.1 inches | 50.8 inches |
| Depth | 10.2 inches | 10.1 inches |
| Height | 4.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| Weight | 24.5 lbs | 28 lbs |
| Build Quality | Lightweight, slightly flexible | Sturdy, more rigid |
| Portability | Easier to carry | Slightly heavier but still portable |
| Control Interface | Single button, key combinations | Dedicated volume knob, slightly easier controls |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Overall Aesthetic | Sleek, minimal, professional | Modern, industrial, professional |
Which One is Better in Terms of Design & Build?
The choice between the Yamaha P-143 and the Roland FP-10 depends on your priorities:
✔ Choose the Yamaha P-143 if:
- You need a highly portable digital piano for easy transport.
- You prefer a super slim and minimalistic design.
- You don’t mind using key combinations for functions instead of dedicated buttons.
✔ Choose the Roland FP-10 if:
- You want better build quality and a sturdier keybed.
- You prefer a more substantial instrument that feels less like a lightweight keyboard.
- You want built-in Bluetooth MIDI for connecting to learning apps and DAWs.
Final Thoughts
- If portability is your top concern, the Yamaha P-143 is the better choice.
- If you prefer durability, a more solid keybed, and extra features like Bluetooth, the Roland FP-10 is the clear winner.
In the next section, we’ll compare keyboard action and playability, which is arguably the most important factor when choosing a digital piano. Stay tuned! 🎹
Keyboard & Action
When it comes to choosing a digital piano, keyboard feel and action are arguably the most critical aspects. A digital piano should replicate the weight, response, and touch of an acoustic piano as closely as possible, making the playing experience realistic and expressive. The Yamaha P-143 and Roland FP-10 both feature fully weighted 88-key hammer-action keyboards, but they take different approaches in how they simulate an acoustic piano’s feel.
In this section, we’ll do a deep dive into their key actions, including the mechanisms, key textures, responsiveness, realism, and overall playability to help you decide which one is better suited to your needs.
Yamaha P-143: Graded Hammer Standard (GHS) Action
Yamaha has equipped the P-143 with its Graded Hammer Standard (GHS) key action, the same mechanism found in its predecessor, the P-45. This is Yamaha’s entry-level hammer action, designed to provide a realistic weight distribution similar to an acoustic piano.
Key Features of GHS Action
✔ Graded weight: The keys are heavier in the lower register and lighter in the upper register, mimicking the way an acoustic piano’s hammers function.
✔ Springless design: Uses hammer weight instead of springs for a more realistic feel.
✔ Slightly sluggish response: While decent for beginners, advanced players may find it a bit slow for fast repetitions.
✔ Plastic keytops: The keys are smooth and glossy, which can feel slippery, especially for long playing sessions.
Realism & Playability
The graded weighting is a definite plus for beginners who want a true-to-life piano feel, but GHS action is one of Yamaha’s oldest and least refined key actions. The lack of escapement (which is present in more advanced actions) means that it doesn’t replicate the feel of a grand piano’s mechanism as well as Roland’s PHA-4 Standard.
Another downside is that fast note repetition can feel sluggish. If you frequently play pieces that require quick staccato notes or repeated trills, the GHS action may feel limiting. However, for slower classical music, chordal playing, and general practice, it still provides a solid foundation for building proper finger strength.
Who is GHS Best For?
- Beginners who are transitioning from unweighted keyboards.
- Casual players who don’t need extremely responsive action.
- Those who prefer a slightly heavier, resistance-based action.
Roland FP-10: PHA-4 Standard Action
The Roland FP-10 features the PHA-4 Standard key action, which is a major step up from Yamaha’s GHS. Roland’s PHA (Progressive Hammer Action) series is widely praised for its realistic touch and advanced features, even in their budget models.
Key Features of PHA-4 Standard Action
✔ Graded weight: Like the Yamaha, the Roland’s keys are heavier in the bass and lighter in the treble.
✔ Escapement mechanism: Simulates the slight “notch” felt when pressing a key slowly, just like on a grand piano.
✔ Ivory-feel keytops: The textured keys feel more like real ivory and ebony, providing a better grip than Yamaha’s smooth plastic keys.
✔ Faster key repetition: The keys return quicker, making it easier to play rapid passages.
Realism & Playability
The escapement mechanism is one of the biggest advantages of Roland’s PHA-4 Standard action. This small but noticeable “click” when pressing a key lightly is something found in real acoustic pianos, adding to the authenticity. Yamaha’s GHS lacks this feature entirely.
Additionally, the PHA-4 Standard keytops have a textured, matte surface, preventing fingers from slipping as much as on the Yamaha P-143. This makes a huge difference during longer practice sessions or live performances.
The key return speed is also noticeably faster than Yamaha’s GHS, making it the better option for fast passages, repeated notes, and advanced techniques. If you play jazz, fast classical music, or anything that requires agility, the FP-10 is the clear winner.
Who is PHA-4 Standard Best For?
- Beginners who want the best possible key action for their budget.
- Intermediate and advanced players looking for a realistic key feel.
- Anyone who plays fast pieces requiring quick key repetition.
- Players who prefer a more textured, realistic key surface.
Key Texture: Plastic vs. Ivory Feel
| Feature | Yamaha P-143 (GHS) | Roland FP-10 (PHA-4) |
|---|---|---|
| Material | Glossy plastic | Textured ivory-feel plastic |
| Grip | Slippery when hands sweat | Better grip, reduces slipping |
| Overall feel | Feels like a beginner keyboard | Feels closer to an acoustic piano |
One of the biggest complaints about Yamaha’s GHS action is the glossy plastic keytops. They don’t absorb moisture, making them slippery during long practice sessions. In contrast, Roland’s PHA-4 keys have a textured, ivory-like surface, which provides a much better grip.
If you’ve ever played on a real acoustic piano, you’ll immediately notice that the Roland feels much closer to the real thing in terms of key texture.
Key Noise & Quietness
One overlooked aspect of digital piano key actions is noise level. Some keyboards produce loud key noise, which can be distracting for practice, especially if you play late at night or in an apartment.
Noise Comparison
- Yamaha P-143: Moderate key noise. Not overly loud, but some users report that the GHS action feels a bit clunky and plastic-like when pressed hard.
- Roland FP-10: Slightly quieter. The PHA-4 action feels more refined, reducing the amount of mechanical noise.
While neither keyboard is completely silent, the Roland FP-10 has a slightly quieter and smoother key action.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | Yamaha P-143 (GHS) | Roland FP-10 (PHA-4) |
|---|---|---|
| Key Action Type | Graded Hammer Standard (GHS) | PHA-4 Standard |
| Graded Hammer Action | Yes | Yes |
| Escapement Mechanism | No | Yes |
| Keytop Texture | Glossy plastic | Ivory-feel textured plastic |
| Fast Key Repetition | No (sluggish response) | Yes (quicker return) |
| Best For | Beginners, casual players | All skill levels, fast players |
Final Verdict: Which Key Action is Better?
✔ Choose the Yamaha P-143 if:
- You’re a beginner and don’t need advanced key response.
- You prefer a slightly heavier feel in the lower register.
- You don’t mind plastic, glossy keys.
✔ Choose the Roland FP-10 if:
- You want the most realistic key action in this price range.
- You need fast key repetition for advanced pieces.
- You prefer textured keys with an ivory feel.
- You want a more refined and responsive playing experience.
Final Score for Key Action
- Yamaha P-143: 6.5/10 (Decent for beginners, but feels outdated)
- Roland FP-10: 9/10 (Best key action in its price range)
Overall, the Roland FP-10 is the clear winner when it comes to keyboard feel and action. If you care about playability, PHA-4 Standard is miles ahead of Yamaha’s GHS action.
Sound Quality
One of the most crucial aspects of any digital piano is sound quality. After all, no matter how great the key action is, if the piano doesn’t sound good, it won’t provide an enjoyable playing experience. The Yamaha P-143 and Roland FP-10 use different sound engines and sampling technologies, each with its own distinct tonal character.
In this section, we’ll break down their sound engines, polyphony, realism, resonance, dynamic range, and overall tonal quality, helping you decide which instrument delivers the best sound for your needs.
Sound Engine: Yamaha CFX (Simplified) vs. Roland SuperNATURAL
Both pianos use advanced digital sound engines designed to recreate the tone of a high-end acoustic grand piano. However, their approaches are quite different.
Yamaha P-143: Simplified CFX Sound Engine
Yamaha upgraded the P-143’s sound engine to a simplified version of their premium CFX grand piano sound. The CFX sound engine is featured in Yamaha’s high-end digital pianos, but the version in the P-143 is a pared-down adaptation of this technology.
Characteristics of the Yamaha P-143’s Sound Engine
✔ Bright and clear tone: Yamaha pianos are known for their crisp, bright sound, which cuts through a mix easily.
✔ Good for classical and pop music: The clarity and brightness make it great for classical, pop, and jazz.
✔ Simple sampling, lacks depth: Compared to Yamaha’s higher-end models, the P-143’s CFX sound lacks depth, resonance, and complexity.
✔ No string resonance: Unlike higher-end Yamaha models, the P-143 doesn’t have realistic string resonance, making it sound more artificial.
Roland FP-10: SuperNATURAL Sound Engine
The Roland FP-10 uses Roland’s famous SuperNATURAL sound engine, which has been praised for its warm, expressive, and realistic tone. Unlike Yamaha’s approach, Roland’s SuperNATURAL modeling doesn’t rely purely on sampling—it blends sampling and physical modeling to recreate the subtle nuances of an acoustic piano.
Characteristics of the Roland FP-10’s Sound Engine
✔ Richer, fuller tone: The FP-10 sounds warmer and deeper than the Yamaha.
✔ Great dynamic expression: The FP-10 responds beautifully to soft and loud playing, making it more expressive.
✔ More realistic resonance and decay: SuperNATURAL’s hybrid sampling/modeling approach creates more natural note decay, making it sound more like a real grand piano.
✔ More organic and natural bass response: The low-end sounds more realistic compared to the Yamaha P-143.
Sound Engine Verdict
| Feature | Yamaha P-143 (CFX) | Roland FP-10 (SuperNATURAL) |
|---|---|---|
| Sampling vs. Modeling | Sample-based | Hybrid sample & modeling |
| Tone Quality | Bright and clear | Warm and rich |
| Dynamic Expression | Limited | Better response |
| Resonance & Decay | Lacks realism | More natural decay |
| Best For | Classical, pop, jazz | Classical, jazz, expressive playing |
Overall, the Roland FP-10’s SuperNATURAL sound engine is more advanced and realistic than the Yamaha P-143’s simplified CFX engine.
Polyphony: 64 vs. 96 Notes
Polyphony refers to the number of notes a digital piano can play simultaneously. While most pieces won’t require extremely high polyphony, a higher number ensures smoother note transitions, sustain, and layering effects.
- Yamaha P-143: 64-note polyphony
- Roland FP-10: 96-note polyphony
Since 64 notes of polyphony can sometimes cause note dropouts when using sustain, Yamaha’s limitation here is noticeable. 96-note polyphony on the FP-10 is a clear advantage, especially for classical pieces with long sustain and complex chords.
Sound Realism & Tonal Depth
A great digital piano doesn’t just need a good core piano tone—it also needs to simulate the nuances of a real acoustic piano, such as sympathetic resonance, key-off samples, and natural sustain decay.
Yamaha P-143
- Lacks natural resonance: Notes sound slightly isolated rather than blending naturally.
- Sustain is decent but not overly realistic: The decay of sustained notes is shorter than a real acoustic piano.
- Sounds slightly artificial in lower registers: The bass range is not as full-bodied as Roland’s.
Roland FP-10
- Better sustain decay: Notes fade out naturally rather than cutting off suddenly.
- More natural overtones and resonance: When playing with the sustain pedal, notes blend together more organically.
- More expressive: Subtle dynamic changes are better captured, making it feel closer to a real acoustic piano.
Again, Roland’s sound is more organic and authentic, whereas Yamaha’s sound feels slightly processed and digital.
Sound Customization & Additional Voices
Yamaha P-143
- 10 total sounds (Pianos, electric pianos, organs, and strings).
- Limited customization options—you can adjust reverb, but that’s about it.
Roland FP-10
- 15 total sounds (More variety, including additional electric pianos, organs, and harpsichord).
- Better sound customization—you can tweak ambiance, brilliance, and resonance.
While both pianos focus primarily on acoustic piano tones, the Roland FP-10 offers more variety and better customization options.
How Do They Sound? (Subjective Tone Comparison)
| Feature | Yamaha P-143 | Roland FP-10 |
|---|---|---|
| Bass (Low-End) | Slightly weaker | Fuller and richer |
| Midrange | Clear and bright | Warmer and more natural |
| Treble (High Notes) | Crisp and cutting | Smooth and well-rounded |
| Overall Tone | Bright and clear | Warm and rich |
✔ If you like a bright, cutting piano tone, the Yamaha P-143 is better.
✔ If you prefer a warmer, richer, more expressive piano sound, the Roland FP-10 is the clear winner.
Verdict: Which One Has Better Sound?
✔ Choose the Yamaha P-143 if:
- You like bright, clear, and crisp tones (great for classical and pop).
- You don’t need advanced resonance or sustain modeling.
- You want a simple, straightforward sound engine with minimal complexity.
✔ Choose the Roland FP-10 if:
- You want a warmer, richer piano tone with better natural resonance.
- You need more expressive dynamics for classical or jazz playing.
- You prefer a more organic and natural sustain decay.
Final Score for Sound Quality
- Yamaha P-143: 7/10 (Decent, but lacks realism and resonance).
- Roland FP-10: 9/10 (SuperNATURAL sound engine gives it superior warmth and realism).
Final Thoughts
If you’re looking for the most natural, expressive, and realistic piano sound, the Roland FP-10 is the clear winner. Yamaha’s simplified CFX sound is decent but not as immersive or complex. Roland’s SuperNATURAL modeling creates a richer, more dynamic tone, making it the better choice for those who prioritize sound quality.
Speakers
Speakers play a crucial role in shaping the overall sound experience of a digital piano. Even if a piano has an amazing sound engine, poor-quality speakers can make the output sound flat, weak, or artificial. Since both the Yamaha P-143 and Roland FP-10 are entry-level models, their built-in speakers are relatively modest, but there are still key differences in their sound projection, clarity, bass response, and overall output power.
In this section, we’ll compare the speaker systems of both pianos, analyzing sound quality, volume output, placement, and external amplification options.
Speaker System Comparison
| Feature | Yamaha P-143 | Roland FP-10 |
|---|---|---|
| Speaker Configuration | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Speaker Size | 12 cm (each) | 12 cm (each) |
| Total Power Output | 6W x 2 (12W total) | 6W x 2 (12W total) |
| Speaker Placement | Downward-facing | Downward-facing |
| Bass Response | Slightly weaker | Richer and deeper |
| Clarity & Detail | Bright but lacks depth | Fuller, better projection |
On paper, both pianos have similar speaker setups, each with two 12 cm speakers delivering 6W per channel (for a total of 12W). However, in practice, Roland’s speakers sound slightly better, offering fuller, richer sound with stronger bass presence.
Speaker Placement & Projection
Both the Yamaha P-143 and Roland FP-10 use downward-facing speakers, meaning the sound is projected downward onto a surface rather than directly toward the player.
✔ Advantages of downward-facing speakers:
- Creates a more diffused sound, similar to how a grand piano’s sound reflects off a soundboard.
- Prevents harsh treble frequencies from becoming too piercing.
✖ Disadvantages:
- If placed on a soft surface (like a bed or cushioned stand), the sound can get muffled and lose clarity.
- Volume projection is less direct, making it harder to hear details in a noisy environment.
Which One Sounds Better in an Open Room?
- Roland FP-10’s speakers project slightly better, thanks to its warmer tonal balance and more natural bass resonance.
- Yamaha P-143’s speakers sound clear and bright, but they lack depth, making them feel weaker in the lower registers.
In a quiet room, both are adequate for solo practice, but the Roland FP-10 has a more satisfying sound overall.
Volume & Loudness
Since both models have 12W of total speaker output, they are sufficiently loud for home use, but they won’t fill a large room or work well in a band setting.
How Loud Are They?
- At 50-70% volume, both pianos deliver enough sound for solo practice.
- At 100% volume, the Yamaha P-143 starts sounding thin and slightly harsh, while the Roland FP-10 maintains better balance.
- The FP-10 has slightly better bass response, giving it a more full-bodied sound.
If you need to perform with these pianos, an external amplifier or speaker system is recommended.
Sound Quality with External Speakers & Headphones
While their built-in speakers are fine for casual practice, both digital pianos sound significantly better when connected to external speakers or high-quality headphones.
External Speakers
Both the Yamaha P-143 and Roland FP-10 feature a headphone/aux output, allowing you to connect them to:
- Studio monitors (for better clarity and balanced sound).
- Amplifiers (if performing in a larger space).
- External speaker systems (for a richer and more immersive experience).
When connected to external speakers, both models deliver excellent sound quality, taking full advantage of their sound engines without the limitations of small built-in speakers.
Headphones Output
✔ Both pianos sound amazing through headphones, but there’s a difference in tone:
- Yamaha P-143 sounds brighter and crisp but less immersive.
- Roland FP-10 offers a more natural, resonant, and realistic tone.
If you plan on practicing with headphones often, the Roland FP-10 provides a more satisfying listening experience.
Speaker Verdict: Which One is Better?
✔ Choose the Yamaha P-143 if:
- You prefer a bright and clear sound, even if it lacks depth.
- You mostly use headphones or external speakers.
✔ Choose the Roland FP-10 if:
- You want slightly better bass response and fuller speaker sound.
- You plan to practice without headphones and want a more natural sound.
Final Score for Built-in Speakers
- Yamaha P-143: 7/10 (Decent, but lacks bass and depth).
- Roland FP-10: 8/10 (Slightly better projection and richer sound).
Final Thoughts on Speaker Quality
Both digital pianos have modest speaker systems, but the Roland FP-10’s speakers sound slightly fuller and richer than those on the Yamaha P-143. While neither piano offers powerful, performance-ready built-in speakers, they are sufficient for home practice. If you prioritize speaker sound quality, the Roland FP-10 is the better option.
That said, if you plan to use headphones or external speakers, both pianos can sound fantastic—though the Roland FP-10 still has a slight edge in tonal realism and warmth.
Features & Functions
Beyond just sound quality and key action, a digital piano’s features and functions determine how versatile and useful it will be for different playing styles, practice routines, and performance needs. The Yamaha P-143 and Roland FP-10 both offer a set of essential features designed for beginners and intermediate players, but they differ in key areas such as polyphony, built-in sounds, modes, learning tools, and connectivity.
In this section, we’ll take an in-depth look at the features and functionality of these two digital pianos, comparing their capabilities to help you decide which one better suits your needs.
Polyphony: 64 vs. 96 Notes
Polyphony refers to the maximum number of notes that can sound simultaneously before older notes start getting cut off. This is important when playing complex pieces, using the sustain pedal, or layering multiple sounds.
| Feature | Yamaha P-143 | Roland FP-10 |
|---|---|---|
| Polyphony | 64 notes | 96 notes |
- Yamaha P-143 (64-note polyphony): This is sufficient for most beginner and intermediate pieces, but more advanced pieces with lots of sustained notes may experience note dropouts.
- Roland FP-10 (96-note polyphony): Offers more flexibility, especially when playing pieces that require heavy pedal use or fast note repetition.
Which One Wins?
The Roland FP-10 has better polyphony, meaning it can handle more complex pieces and sustain layering without running into limitations.
Built-in Sounds & Instrument Variety
While both the Yamaha P-143 and Roland FP-10 are primarily focused on acoustic piano sounds, they also offer additional instrument voices.
| Feature | Yamaha P-143 | Roland FP-10 |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Sounds | 10 | 15 |
| Primary Piano Sound | CFX Grand Piano | SuperNATURAL Grand Piano |
| Other Voices | Electric pianos, organs, harpsichord, strings | Electric pianos, organs, vibraphone, strings, harpsichord |
- Yamaha P-143 (10 voices): Includes variations of pianos, electric pianos, organs, strings, and harpsichord.
- Roland FP-10 (15 voices): Has a wider selection of sounds, including additional electric pianos and a vibraphone, making it slightly more versatile.
Which One Wins?
The Roland FP-10 has more built-in sounds, making it a better choice if you want more variety beyond just piano tones.
Playing Modes (Dual, Split, Duo)
Both pianos offer various playing modes that allow for different learning and performance setups.
| Feature | Yamaha P-143 | Roland FP-10 |
|---|---|---|
| Dual Mode (Layering Sounds) | Yes | Yes |
| Duo Mode (Twin Piano Mode for Lessons) | Yes | Yes |
| Split Mode (Different Sounds on Each Half of Keyboard) | No | No |
Breakdown of Modes:
✔ Dual Mode (Layering Two Sounds Together) – Both pianos allow you to layer two instrument sounds together. For example, you can blend piano and strings for a more orchestral feel.
✔ Duo Mode (Twin Piano Mode for Lessons) – Both models let you split the keyboard into two identical pitch ranges, allowing a student and teacher to sit side by side and play the same notes.
✖ Split Mode (Different Sounds on Left & Right Hand) – Neither model offers true Split Mode, which means you cannot assign different sounds to the left and right-hand sections of the keyboard.
Which One Wins?
Both pianos are equal in this category, offering Dual and Duo Mode, but lacking Split Mode.
Built-in Learning Tools
Learning tools like a metronome, transposition, and recording functions can be helpful for students and practicing musicians.
| Feature | Yamaha P-143 | Roland FP-10 |
|---|---|---|
| Metronome | Yes | Yes |
| Transpose Function | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in Songs | Yes (10 demo songs) | No |
| Recording Function | No | No |
✔ Metronome & Transpose: Both pianos include a built-in metronome (useful for practicing timing) and a transpose function (useful for changing key signatures without shifting hand positions).
✔ Built-in Songs: The Yamaha P-143 includes 10 built-in demo songs, while the Roland FP-10 does not have pre-loaded songs.
✖ Recording Function: Neither piano offers onboard recording—you’ll need to connect them to a computer or external device for recording purposes.
Which One Wins?
If built-in demo songs are important, the Yamaha P-143 has a slight edge. However, if you plan on recording, neither model has an internal recording function.
Bluetooth & Connectivity Options
| Feature | Yamaha P-143 | Roland FP-10 |
|---|---|---|
| USB MIDI Connection | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth MIDI | No | Yes |
| Headphone Jack | Yes | Yes |
| Pedal Input | Yes | Yes |
- Roland FP-10 has built-in Bluetooth MIDI – This is a huge advantage over the Yamaha P-143, allowing you to wirelessly connect to apps like GarageBand, Flowkey, Simply Piano, and DAWs without using cables.
- Yamaha P-143 lacks Bluetooth – You’ll need to use a USB cable to connect to external devices.
Which One Wins?
Roland FP-10 wins easily in this category because Bluetooth MIDI allows for wireless app integration, making it much more convenient for modern learners and musicians.
Sustain Pedal & Accessories
Both pianos come with a basic sustain pedal, but there are some differences.
| Feature | Yamaha P-143 | Roland FP-10 |
|---|---|---|
| Included Pedal | Basic footswitch | Basic footswitch |
| Supports Half-Damper Pedal? | No | No |
Both models include a simple footswitch-style sustain pedal, but neither supports half-damper functionality (which allows for more nuanced pedal control). If you want a more realistic pedal feel, you’ll need to upgrade to a higher-end sustain pedal.
Which One Wins?
It’s a tie, since both pianos come with basic pedals and lack half-damper support.
Final Verdict: Which Digital Piano Has Better Features?
✔ Choose the Yamaha P-143 if:
- You want built-in demo songs for practice.
- You prefer Yamaha’s bright piano tone over additional instrument sounds.
- You don’t need Bluetooth MIDI.
✔ Choose the Roland FP-10 if:
- You want more sounds (15 vs. 10).
- You need higher polyphony (96 vs. 64).
- You want Bluetooth MIDI for wireless app connection.
Final Score for Features & Functions
- Yamaha P-143: 7/10 (Lacks Bluetooth, fewer sounds, but includes demo songs).
- Roland FP-10: 9/10 (More polyphony, Bluetooth MIDI, more voices).
Final Thoughts
The Roland FP-10 clearly offers better features thanks to Bluetooth MIDI, more sounds, and higher polyphony. While the Yamaha P-143 isn’t bad, it feels slightly outdated compared to Roland’s more modern approach.
If you’re looking for a feature-rich digital piano with excellent app integration, better polyphony, and a wider range of sounds, the Roland FP-10 is the better choice.
Connectivity
Connectivity is an essential aspect of any modern digital piano, influencing how well it integrates with external devices such as computers, smartphones, learning apps, amplifiers, and recording equipment. Whether you’re a beginner looking to connect your piano to learning apps, a producer who needs MIDI compatibility, or a performer who wants to amplify their sound, connectivity options can significantly enhance your experience.
The Yamaha P-143 and Roland FP-10 both offer fundamental connectivity features, but the Roland FP-10 stands out due to Bluetooth MIDI support, a feature missing on the Yamaha P-143. In this section, we’ll take an in-depth look at their port options, Bluetooth capabilities, MIDI compatibility, headphone support, and external speaker connections, helping you determine which one best fits your setup.
Overview of Connectivity Options
Comparison Table: Yamaha P-143 vs. Roland FP-10
| Feature | Yamaha P-143 | Roland FP-10 |
|---|---|---|
| USB to Host (MIDI via USB) | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth MIDI | No | Yes |
| Audio Output (Dedicated Line Out) | No | No |
| Headphone Jack | Yes (1/4″) | Yes (1/4″) |
| Sustain Pedal Input | Yes (basic pedal included) | Yes (basic pedal included) |
USB MIDI Connectivity: Essential for Recording & Apps
Both the Yamaha P-143 and Roland FP-10 feature USB-to-Host ports, allowing them to connect to:
- Computers (for recording, MIDI control, or using DAWs like GarageBand, Ableton, FL Studio, etc.).
- Tablets & Smartphones (for learning apps like Simply Piano, Flowkey, and Piano Marvel).
- External sound modules (for accessing more sounds beyond the built-in voices).
How to Use USB MIDI on These Pianos
- For Computers: Use a USB Type-B to USB Type-A or C cable to connect the piano to a Windows PC, Mac, or iPad.
- For Mobile Devices (iOS & Android): You may need an adapter (such as Apple’s Lightning to USB adapter for iPhones and iPads).
- For DAWs and Virtual Instruments: Once connected, you can use the pianos as a MIDI controller to trigger virtual pianos like Spectrasonics Keyscape, Native Instruments Noire, or Garritan CFX Concert Grand.
✔ Both models offer solid USB MIDI support, making them useful for recording and digital music production.
✖ Neither model has USB Audio, meaning they do not send actual audio signals through USB—you’ll need an external audio interface for recording direct sound.
Which One Wins?
It’s a tie—both pianos have USB MIDI, making them equally effective for recording and digital integration.
Bluetooth MIDI: A Major Advantage for Roland FP-10
One of the biggest differences between the Yamaha P-143 and Roland FP-10 is Bluetooth MIDI support.
✔ Roland FP-10 features built-in Bluetooth MIDI, allowing it to connect wirelessly to:
- Learning apps like Simply Piano, Flowkey, and Piano Marvel.
- Digital Audio Workstations (DAWs) like GarageBand and Logic Pro.
- Synthesizer apps and virtual instrument plugins.
✖ Yamaha P-143 does not have Bluetooth MIDI, meaning you’ll need a wired USB connection to use apps and DAWs.
Why is Bluetooth MIDI Important?
- No cables needed – Avoids the hassle of wired connections.
- Faster setup – Instant pairing with apps and software.
- More mobility – You can place your piano anywhere without worrying about connection limitations.
Limitations of Bluetooth MIDI
While Bluetooth MIDI is convenient, it has a slight latency delay, which means it’s not ideal for live performances. However, for practice, composing, and learning apps, it’s extremely useful.
Which One Wins?
Roland FP-10 is the clear winner in this category due to its built-in Bluetooth MIDI.
Audio Output: No Dedicated Line Outs
A major drawback of both the Yamaha P-143 and Roland FP-10 is the lack of dedicated audio outputs.
✔ Both models have a headphone jack (1/4″ TRS), which can be used as an output.
✖ Neither model has dedicated line-out ports, meaning you cannot directly connect them to a PA system or amplifier without using adapters.
How to Connect to External Speakers or Amplifiers
- Since there are no dedicated line outs, you’ll need to use the headphone jack with a Y-cable (1/4″ to dual 1/4″ or RCA) to connect to external speakers or audio interfaces.
- This method works, but a proper line-out connection would have been better for professional use.
Which One Wins?
It’s a tie—both models lack line-out ports, requiring workarounds to connect to external audio systems.
Headphone Connectivity: Silent Practice Mode
Both the Yamaha P-143 and Roland FP-10 include a 1/4″ headphone jack, allowing for silent practice.
✔ Why is this useful?
- Lets you practice quietly without disturbing others.
- Improves sound quality, as both pianos sound better through headphones than through their built-in speakers.
✔ What types of headphones work best?
For the best experience, use over-ear studio headphones like:
- Audio-Technica ATH-M50X
- Beyerdynamic DT 770 PRO
- Sony MDR-7506
Which One Wins?
It’s a tie, since both pianos offer a headphone jack for silent practice.
Sustain Pedal Input
Both the Yamaha P-143 and Roland FP-10 come with a basic footswitch-style sustain pedal.
✔ Pedal Input:
- Both pianos support a single sustain pedal (1/4″ jack).
✖ No half-damper support – Neither model supports continuous sustain pedal control, meaning more nuanced pedal techniques found in advanced acoustic piano playing are not fully replicated.
If you want a better sustain pedal experience, consider upgrading to a higher-quality pedal, such as:
- Yamaha FC3A (for Yamaha)
- Roland DP-10 (for Roland)
Which One Wins?
It’s a tie, since both only support basic sustain pedal functionality.
Final Verdict: Which One Has Better Connectivity?
✔ Choose the Yamaha P-143 if:
- You’re okay with using USB cables for app and DAW connections.
- You don’t need Bluetooth MIDI.
✔ Choose the Roland FP-10 if:
- You want built-in Bluetooth MIDI for wireless connectivity with learning apps and DAWs.
- You prefer a more future-proof, modern connectivity setup.
Final Score for Connectivity
- Yamaha P-143: 7/10 (Decent connectivity but lacks Bluetooth).
- Roland FP-10: 9/10 (Bluetooth MIDI is a huge advantage).
Final Thoughts on Connectivity
The Roland FP-10 is the clear winner in this category because of Bluetooth MIDI, making it more versatile for modern musicians. While both pianos offer USB MIDI, the lack of Bluetooth on the Yamaha P-143 feels like a missed opportunity.
If wireless app integration and seamless digital connectivity matter to you, Roland FP-10 is the better choice.
Value for Money
When shopping for a digital piano, it’s essential to consider not just the price, but what you’re actually getting for your money. A good purchase balances performance, features, build quality, and long-term usability. The Yamaha P-143 and Roland FP-10 are both affordable entry-level digital pianos, but they offer different advantages depending on your priorities.
In this section, we’ll break down the pricing, included accessories, upgrade potential, longevity, and overall value to help determine which piano offers the best bang for your buck.
Price Comparison
| Model | Price Range (Approx.) |
|---|---|
| Yamaha P-143 | $550 – $600 |
| Roland FP-10 | $550 – $600 |
Both pianos are similarly priced, typically ranging between $550 and $600, depending on sales, bundles, and regional availability. Since they cost about the same, the question becomes: which one offers more for the money?
What’s Included in the Box?
When evaluating value, it’s important to look at what you’re getting out of the box.
| Included Item | Yamaha P-143 | Roland FP-10 |
|---|---|---|
| Power Adapter | Yes | Yes |
| Music Rest | Yes | Yes |
| Sustain Pedal | Basic footswitch | Basic footswitch |
| Stand | Not included | Not included |
Breakdown of Included Accessories:
- Both pianos come with a basic sustain pedal, but it’s a cheap footswitch-style pedal, not a proper damper pedal. If you want a more realistic pedal feel, you’ll need to purchase a higher-quality sustain pedal separately.
- Neither piano includes a stand, so you’ll need to buy one separately if you don’t already have a compatible stand or table.
✔ Since both models include the same basic accessories, they are tied in terms of what comes in the box.
Features & Performance vs. Price
At the same price point, the Roland FP-10 offers more in terms of features and performance.
| Feature | Yamaha P-143 | Roland FP-10 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Key Action | GHS (basic, slightly sluggish) | PHA-4 Standard (more realistic) | FP-10 |
| Sound Engine | Simplified CFX (bright but lacks depth) | SuperNATURAL (warmer, richer) | FP-10 |
| Polyphony | 64 notes | 96 notes | FP-10 |
| Speakers | Decent, but weak bass | Fuller sound with better bass | FP-10 |
| Bluetooth MIDI | No | Yes | FP-10 |
✔ The Roland FP-10 offers better key action, richer sound, higher polyphony, and Bluetooth MIDI at the same price, making it the superior value option.
Longevity & Upgrade Potential
A good digital piano should last several years before you feel the need to upgrade.
✔ The Roland FP-10 is more future-proof due to:
- Better key action (PHA-4 Standard is suitable for advanced players).
- Higher polyphony (96 notes vs. 64 notes), making it better for complex pieces.
- Bluetooth MIDI, allowing it to integrate with modern apps and DAWs.
✖ The Yamaha P-143 feels more like a short-term beginner’s instrument due to:
- GHS key action, which many players outgrow within a couple of years.
- Lower polyphony, which may lead to note dropouts in more complex songs.
- No Bluetooth, meaning wired connections are the only option for learning apps and digital use.
Which One Has Better Longevity?
The Roland FP-10 will last longer before needing an upgrade, making it the better investment.
Hidden Costs: What Will You Need to Buy?
Beyond the initial purchase, you may need to spend money on additional accessories to enhance your playing experience.
| Accessory | Needed for Yamaha P-143? | Needed for Roland FP-10? | Estimated Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sustain Pedal Upgrade | Yes (better control) | Yes (better control) | ~$30 – $50 |
| Keyboard Stand | Yes (not included) | Yes (not included) | ~$50 – $100 |
| Bench | Optional | Optional | ~$40 – $80 |
| Headphones (for practice) | Recommended | Recommended | ~$50 – $150 |
| External Speakers | Recommended (weak built-in speakers) | Optional | ~$100 – $300 |
✔ Both models require similar additional investments, but since the Roland FP-10 has better built-in speakers, you might not need to upgrade your sound system as quickly.
Resale Value
If you plan on upgrading in the future, resale value is something to consider.
✔ Roland FP-10 has better resale value due to:
- More desirable key action (PHA-4 Standard).
- More advanced features (Bluetooth, better sound engine, higher polyphony).
✖ Yamaha P-143 may depreciate faster because:
- GHS key action is outdated and not as in-demand.
- No Bluetooth, lower polyphony—fewer selling points in the used market.
Which One Retains Value Better?
The Roland FP-10 is likely to hold its value longer, meaning you could resell it for a better price when upgrading.
Final Verdict: Which One Offers the Best Value for Money?
✔ Choose the Yamaha P-143 if:
- You’re a beginner who prefers Yamaha’s bright tone.
- You don’t need Bluetooth or additional features.
- You’re okay with eventually upgrading to a higher-end model.
✔ Choose the Roland FP-10 if:
- You want the best key action at this price.
- You prefer a more realistic, warmer piano sound.
- You want Bluetooth MIDI for app learning and wireless integration.
- You need higher polyphony for long-term use.
Final Score for Value for Money
- Yamaha P-143: 7/10 (Decent, but feels slightly overpriced for what it offers).
- Roland FP-10: 9/10 (Better features for the same price, making it the superior value).
Final Thoughts on Value for Money
While both pianos are similarly priced, the Roland FP-10 offers significantly better features for the same cost. If you’re looking for the best long-term investment, the FP-10 is the better value, offering better playability, richer sound, and modern connectivity options.
If budget is your main concern and you only need a basic piano for beginner use, the Yamaha P-143 is still a good option—but if you want more for your money, the Roland FP-10 is the clear winner.
Final Verdict
After thoroughly comparing the Yamaha P-143 and Roland FP-10, it’s clear that while both pianos are excellent choices for beginners and intermediate players, the Roland FP-10 comes out on top in several key areas.
Which One Should You Buy?
✔ Choose the Yamaha P-143 if:
- You prefer Yamaha’s signature bright and clear piano tone.
- You need a lightweight, ultra-portable digital piano.
- You’re looking for a simple, straightforward instrument for home practice.
- You don’t need Bluetooth connectivity or extra features.
✔ Choose the Roland FP-10 if:
- You want the best key action in this price range (PHA-4 Standard is superior to Yamaha’s GHS).
- You prefer a warmer, more natural piano sound with better resonance and sustain.
- You want higher polyphony (96 vs. 64 notes) for better note sustain and layering.
- You need Bluetooth MIDI for wireless app integration and DAW connectivity.
- You want better speaker output for a fuller, richer playing experience.
Final Scores:
| Feature | Yamaha P-143 | Roland FP-10 |
|---|---|---|
| Key Action | 7/10 | 9/10 |
| Sound Quality | 7/10 | 9/10 |
| Speakers | 7/10 | 8/10 |
| Features & Functions | 7/10 | 9/10 |
| Connectivity | 7/10 | 9/10 |
| Value for Money | 7/10 | 9/10 |
| Overall Score | 7.2/10 | 8.8/10 |
Final Thoughts
If you’re looking for the best digital piano under $600, the Roland FP-10 is the clear winner. It outperforms the Yamaha P-143 in nearly every category, making it the best value-for-money choice. That said, if you love Yamaha’s bright sound and ultra-lightweight design, the P-143 is still a solid option.