When it comes to choosing a digital piano under $2,000 that offers an acoustic-like experience, two names rise to the top: the Yamaha YDP-165 and the Kawai CN201. Both are popular choices among intermediate players, serious beginners, and even experienced pianists who need a second instrument for home practice. They’re also go-to models for anyone wanting a reliable, good-sounding digital piano without spending a fortune.
So which one’s right for you?
In this review, I’ll break down the design, keyboard action, sound engine, speaker system, features, connectivity, and value for money of each. I’ve personally tested both pianos side-by-side and will call it like it is. This isn’t a spec-sheet regurgitation—this is a hands-on, critical look at both instruments.
Let’s get into it.
Yamaha YDP-165 vs Kawai CN201 Comparison Chart
If you click the links below, under the product images, you will be redirected to Amazon.com. In case you then decide to buy anything, Amazon.com will pay me a commission. This doesn’t affect the honesty of this review in any way though.
| Category | Yamaha YDP-165 | Kawai CN201 |
|---|---|---|
 |  | |
| Price | Check the best price on Amazon | Check the best price on Amazon |
| Key Action | Graded Hammer Standard (GHS) | Responsive Hammer Compact III (RHC III) |
| Key Material | Plastic keys with matte black tops | Synthetic ivory & ebony key surfaces |
| Sensors | Dual sensor | Triple sensor |
| Let-off Simulation | No | Yes |
| Sound Engine | Yamaha CFX Stereo Sampling | Shigeru Kawai SK-EX Rendering |
| Resonance Modeling | No (limited damper) | Yes (damper, string, key-off, cabinet resonance) |
| Polyphony | 192 notes | 192 notes |
| Voices | 10 | 19 |
| Modes | Dual, Duo | Dual, Split, Four Hands (Duo) |
| Speaker System | 2 x 20W, downward-firing | 2 x 20W, tuned stereo with cabinet projection |
| Headphone Features | Standard stereo output | Spatial Headphone Sound (SHS) |
| Bluetooth MIDI | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth Audio | No | Yes |
| USB to Host | Yes (MIDI only) | Yes (MIDI & Audio) |
| USB to Device | No | Yes |
| Line Outputs | No | Yes (1/4″ stereo) |
| Audio Recording | No | Yes (via USB Audio) |
| MIDI Recorder | 1 song, 2 tracks | 3 songs, 10,000 notes + USB save/load |
| Display | None | OLED display |
| App Support | Smart Pianist (USB only) | PianoRemote, Virtual Technician (Bluetooth) |
| Lesson Songs | No | 40 built-in etudes and exercises |
| Finish Options | Black, Rosewood, White, White Ash | Satin Black, Rosewood, White |
| Dimensions (W x H x D) | 1,357 x 849 x 422 mm | 1,360 x 860 x 405 mm |
| Weight | ~42 kg (92 lbs) | ~45.5 kg (100 lbs) |
| My individual reviews | Yamaha YDP-165 review | – |
Design & Build Quality
When shopping for a digital piano in the $1,500–$1,800 range, build quality and design might not be the first thing you think about—but it absolutely matters. A digital piano isn’t just an instrument; it’s a piece of furniture, especially when it’s designed to resemble an upright. You’re not just buying a tool to play music—you’re buying something that will sit prominently in your living space, possibly for years.
So how do the Yamaha YDP-165 and Kawai CN201 stack up in terms of aesthetics, material quality, durability, and overall design experience?
Let’s take a close look.
Visual Aesthetics: Traditional vs. Refined
The Yamaha YDP-165 follows a familiar formula. It looks like a small upright piano with a slightly chunky profile. The design is clean, but it’s conservative—there’s nothing bold or particularly modern about it. That’s not a bad thing. For many homes, especially traditional interiors, the YDP-165 blends right in.
The cabinet features straight edges, a tall music rest, and a fairly deep base. It has the kind of bulk you’d expect from a piece meant to resemble a real acoustic piano. It’s available in four finishes—black, dark rosewood, white, and white ash. The black and rosewood look traditional, while the white versions cater to more contemporary or minimalist spaces.
In contrast, the Kawai CN201 leans more modern in its design language. It still nods to the upright piano silhouette, but it’s sleeker and more thoughtfully styled. The edges are rounded, the surface texture is smoother, and the whole unit has a more refined visual flow. It’s a more contemporary-looking piano without being flashy or futuristic.
The CN201 comes in satin black, rosewood, and white. While the finishes are similar to Yamaha’s on paper, in person, they feel a notch higher in quality. The satin texture feels less plasticky and more premium—closer to a matte lacquer finish than a cheap laminate.
Design Verdict:
- Yamaha is safe, predictable, and neutral.
- Kawai is modern, elegant, and subtly upscale.
Material Quality and Cabinet Construction
Now let’s talk about materials.
Both pianos use MDF (medium-density fiberboard) for the cabinet structure, which is standard at this price point. Neither is made of solid wood (you’d have to spend $3,000+ for that), but the way each brand handles finish, weight, and assembly differs.
The YDP-165 feels solidly put together. Once assembled, it doesn’t wobble, and the parts align well. But when you’re putting it together or looking closely, you’ll notice some cost-saving measures: thinner side panels, plastic pedal supports, and a relatively light-weight backboard. It’s functional and durable enough for home use, but it doesn’t feel particularly luxurious.
The Kawai CN201, on the other hand, is better engineered. It’s heavier overall (by about 8–10 pounds), which gives it a more grounded, substantial feel. The key cover moves more smoothly, the music stand feels sturdier, and the pedal unit is encased in thicker support beams. These little details add up.
Another subtle thing: noise. The CN201’s cabinet absorbs mechanical vibrations and key thumps better. The result is a quieter, more acoustically “dead” cabinet, which is exactly what you want in a digital instrument—less rattle, less resonance, more focus on the speaker output.
Material Verdict:
- Yamaha is functional, solid, but shows its price in the details.
- Kawai feels more premium, more stable, and more refined.
Assembly & Ergonomics
Both pianos come flat-packed and require home assembly, which usually takes around 45–60 minutes. The process is similar: bolt the sides to the base, attach the backboard, screw on the pedal unit, and mount the keyboard chassis on top.
That said, the YDP-165 is a slightly easier build because it has fewer parts. It’s also lighter (about 92 lbs fully assembled), which makes it a bit easier to move around a room. The CN201 weighs in at about 100 lbs assembled—not a huge difference, but you feel it.
Ergonomically, the CN201 is better designed. The key height, pedal placement, and music stand angle all feel more thoughtfully executed. The keybed height is closer to that of a real acoustic upright, and the pedal depth and spacing feel more realistic—especially if you use the soft pedal regularly.
The YDP-165 is comfortable enough, but the music stand isn’t adjustable, and the pedals feel slightly lower and less resistant compared to an acoustic piano.
Ergonomics Verdict:
- Yamaha is comfortable and easy to assemble.
- Kawai offers better real-piano alignment and more solid pedal ergonomics.
User Interface and Physical Controls
When it comes to user interaction, Yamaha goes the ultra-minimal route. The YDP-165 has no screen. Just a handful of buttons and a combination of key presses for changing voices, metronome settings, and functions. It’s fine once you memorize the shortcuts, but there’s a learning curve—and it’s not very intuitive.
The Kawai CN201 includes an OLED screen, which might sound like a small thing—but it makes a huge difference. You can navigate voices, settings, Bluetooth, and metronome parameters with clear visual feedback. For families, students, or anyone not interested in reading the manual every time they want to turn on Bluetooth, this is a big usability win.
Interface Verdict:
- Yamaha: minimal but limited.
- Kawai: user-friendly and intuitive.
How They Fit in Your Home
This might seem subjective, but hear me out: digital pianos are often placed in living rooms, bedrooms, or shared spaces. So how they look and feel matters—especially if you want it to blend into the room rather than dominate it.
- The YDP-165, with its slightly boxier look, works well in traditional or transitional rooms. If your home leans toward classic furniture or older decor, the YDP fits in naturally.
- The Kawai CN201 is a better fit for modern homes or minimalist interiors. Its rounded lines, better-finished surfaces, and subtle elegance make it feel more like a modern piece of furniture rather than just a utility.
If aesthetics play a role in your decision (and they should), the CN201 will be the more universally appealing option for modern homes.
Final Thoughts on Design & Build Quality
If we zoom out, here’s the scorecard for this category:
| Sub-Category | Winner |
|---|---|
| Cabinet Aesthetics | Kawai CN201 |
| Material Quality | Kawai CN201 |
| Assembly & Structure | Kawai CN201 |
| Ergonomics | Kawai CN201 |
| User Interface | Kawai CN201 |
| Finish & Surface Feel | Kawai CN201 |
| Overall Design Value | Kawai CN201 |
The Yamaha YDP-165 is a well-built instrument with traditional charm. It looks like a digital piano, and it does its job reliably. But the Kawai CN201 goes further. It feels like a polished, mature piece of furniture and instrument design. You can tell Kawai put thought into both the musical and domestic aspects of this piano.
So if design matters to you—not just how a piano plays, but how it feels to live with—the Kawai CN201 pulls ahead by a significant margin.
Keyboard Action
The keyboard action is the heart of any digital piano. You can have the best sound engine in the world, but if the keys don’t feel right, the playing experience falls apart.
Both Yamaha and Kawai are well-known acoustic piano manufacturers, and both have brought decades of mechanical design knowledge into the digital realm. But at this price point—around $1,500 to $1,800—compromises are made. So which piano does a better job of simulating the feel of a real acoustic grand?
Let’s break it down.
Yamaha YDP-165: Graded Hammer Standard (GHS)
The Yamaha YDP-165 uses GHS—Graded Hammer Standard. This is Yamaha’s most basic weighted action, and it’s been in use for well over a decade. If you’ve played any entry-level Yamaha digital piano, you’ve likely experienced this action before.
How it works:
- The keys are weighted with mechanical hammers (not springs), and the action is “graded”—heavier on the low end, lighter in the treble.
- There’s no escapement mechanism or triple-sensor design.
- Key surfaces are smooth plastic with a matte finish on the black keys to help reduce slipping.
How it feels:
Let’s be honest: the GHS action is fine—but it’s not great. It gets the job done, and beginners won’t find it too difficult to work with. But if you’ve ever played a real grand or even a decent upright, you’ll immediately notice the difference. GHS is lighter and less dynamic, with a shallow key dip and not much resistance. You can’t really “dig in” to the keys and get nuanced control over velocity.
Fast repetitions and trills aren’t the most responsive, either. There’s a very slight bounce-back feel that reminds you this is an entry-level action. On top of that, GHS doesn’t have a long pivot point, so playing with correct technique near the key fallboard (toward the back of the key) feels stiff and inconsistent.
Who is it for?
- Beginners who don’t yet have a developed touch.
- Casual players looking for a solid, familiar feel.
- Those who prefer a lighter action overall.
But intermediate or advanced players may find GHS limiting, especially if they’re practicing complex classical or jazz repertoire that requires fine control over dynamics and articulation.
Kawai CN201: Responsive Hammer Compact III (RHC III)
This is where Kawai pulls ahead—by quite a bit. The CN201 features Responsive Hammer Compact III (RHC III), a newer and more sophisticated action designed specifically for Kawai’s mid-range digital pianos.
How it works:
- RHC III uses a triple sensor system for more accurate detection of repeated key presses.
- Keys are graded and weighted without springs, using real counterweights and hammers.
- There’s also a let-off simulation, which mimics the subtle “notch” sensation you feel in grand piano action as the hammer disengages.
- Key surfaces are made of synthetic ivory and ebony, providing grip, texture, and a slight porous feel that absorbs moisture.
How it feels:
Playing the CN201 feels much closer to a real acoustic piano. The keys have a longer pivot length, which makes them feel more balanced and responsive across the full length. Whether you’re playing near the tips or closer to the fallboard, you get consistent control. That’s crucial for proper technique development and expressive performance.
There’s more weight and resistance than GHS, but not in a sluggish way. It’s firm, stable, and allows for both delicate pianissimo and explosive fortissimo with ease. The triple sensor system ensures that fast repetitions register cleanly, and the escapement simulation adds a nice mechanical realism that many digital pianos skip entirely in this price range.
Kawai also does an excellent job with key cushioning. There’s less thump and less mechanical noise when the keys bottom out or return to position, which makes a difference during quiet practice or headphone use.
Who is it for?
- Intermediate and advanced pianists looking for more realism.
- Classical players who want nuanced touch and expression.
- Anyone planning to transition to an acoustic piano later.
Even beginners benefit from this better action—it helps develop correct finger strength, dynamic control, and hand position from day one.
Head-to-Head: Key Technical Differences
| Feature | Yamaha YDP-165 (GHS) | Kawai CN201 (RHC III) |
|---|---|---|
| Graded Hammer Action | Yes | Yes |
| Key Surface | Matte black keys only | Synthetic ivory/ebony |
| Sensor System | Dual sensor | Triple sensor |
| Let-off Simulation | No | Yes |
| Escapement Feel | No | Yes |
| Pivot Length | Short | Long |
| Key Weight Feel | Light-Medium | Medium-Heavy |
| Repetition Response | Moderate | Excellent |
Real-World Playing Scenarios
Let’s talk about how both actions hold up in different playing contexts.
Scales and Technique Practice
On the Yamaha YDP-165, scales are doable but lack the resistance needed to build finger strength effectively. On the Kawai CN201, there’s more feedback, and the weight distribution feels closer to an acoustic grand—making it a better tool for technique development.
Fast Repetition / Trills
Kawai’s triple sensor wins here. Rapid note repetition feels clean and immediate, especially for classical or advanced jazz where note clarity matters. Yamaha’s GHS struggles slightly with fast repetitions, especially in the mid and upper registers.
Soft Playing / Dynamics
This is a big deal. The CN201 allows for far more gradation in soft playing. Pianissimo passages have clarity and precision. On the YDP-165, soft playing tends to compress too early—you lose subtlety, and everything sounds a bit flat.
Heavy Chordal Playing
For big block chords, both actions hold up, but Kawai’s slightly heavier feel gives you more control over voicing. The extra realism in the keybed adds emotional depth when playing dense, expressive material.
Noise and Feel
If you play late at night or live in a shared home, mechanical noise matters.
- Yamaha YDP-165: Keys are a bit noisier, and the rebound thump is more noticeable. Not loud—but present.
- Kawai CN201: Quieter key return, softer bottoming out. Much better suited for headphone practice in quiet environments.
Long-Term Experience & Durability
Both Yamaha and Kawai have solid reputations for reliability. But long-term, the GHS action tends to show wear sooner. It can become noisier and lose some of its initial feel after a few years of heavy playing.
Kawai’s RHC III is built to tighter tolerances and generally retains its feel longer. Plus, the textured key surfaces resist shine and wear better over time.
Final Thoughts on Keyboard Action
The GHS in the Yamaha YDP-165 is a good starting point, especially if you’re new to piano. It’s familiar, not too heavy, and easy on the fingers. But it’s also an older design, and it starts to feel limiting the more advanced your playing becomes.
The Kawai CN201’s RHC III, on the other hand, is a standout feature at this price. It offers a realistic, responsive, and satisfying playing experience that scales with your skills. It’s one of the best actions available under $2,000, and it’s frankly amazing that Kawai includes it in a mid-range model.
Verdict:
- Winner: Kawai CN201
- For beginners, it helps build good habits. For experienced players, it doesn’t hold you back. It feels more like a real instrument and less like a simulation.
Sound Engine & Tonality
If keyboard action is the heart of a digital piano, then sound is its soul. It’s what you hear and feel every time you touch a key. And while most digital pianos at this price point rely on sampling (as opposed to physical modeling), the quality of that sampling—along with the effects, resonance modeling, and speaker projection—makes all the difference in realism and musicality.
So, how do the Yamaha YDP-165 and Kawai CN201 stack up?
Let’s take a deep dive into the sound engines, tonal profiles, and sonic realism of both instruments, from headphone use to room-filling playback.
Yamaha YDP-165: CFX Grand Sampling Engine
The YDP-165 uses Yamaha’s highly regarded CFX concert grand piano sample as its main sound source. The CFX is Yamaha’s flagship acoustic concert grand piano, known for its brilliance, clarity, and projection. It’s featured across Yamaha’s premium Clavinova series and even their professional stage pianos.
Sampling Quality:
The sample in the YDP-165 is a simplified stereo recording of the CFX. While it’s not as deeply multi-sampled as higher-end Yamaha models, it still captures the piano’s signature brightness and clarity. Notes are recorded at multiple velocities to allow for dynamic expression, but the velocity layers are fewer compared to Kawai’s implementation. You might notice slight jumps in tone when moving between soft and loud playing.
There’s 192-note polyphony, which is sufficient for most pieces, even with layering or pedaling. However, it lacks string resonance modeling, key-off samples, and damper resonance simulation, all of which contribute to a more “living” piano sound.
Tonality:
Tonally, the CFX sample leans bright and clear, with a shimmering top end and punchy midrange. It excels in pop, jazz, rock, and more percussive classical pieces. It has that “Yamaha sound”—clean, articulate, and slightly forward. For players who like clarity and separation, it’s a solid choice.
However, the lower register feels a bit thin, and sustained notes lack the natural bloom you’d hear on an acoustic instrument. At times, especially during quiet or slow passages, the sound feels “flat” or overly processed.
Kawai CN201: SK-EX Rendering Sound Engine
The CN201 takes a very different approach. It uses Kawai’s SK-EX Rendering Engine, based on the Shigeru Kawai SK-EX concert grand—a piano that’s known for its warm, resonant, and emotionally rich tone.
Sampling Quality:
Kawai’s engine is built on multi-layered, 88-key stereo sampling, meaning every key is sampled individually, not stretched across regions. This leads to more realism—each note has its own unique character and behavior. The velocity layers are smoother, and dynamic transitions feel more organic.
More importantly, the CN201 includes a set of harmonic modeling features that Yamaha skips entirely at this price:
- String resonance: simulates the sympathetic vibrations of non-played strings.
- Damper resonance: captures the resonance when the pedal is engaged.
- Key-off simulation: emulates the subtle sound of a damper returning to the string.
- Virtual Technician: a set of editable parameters that let you tailor the piano tone (voicing, damper noise, hammer noise, tuning, etc.).
All of these features work together to create a piano tone that breathes and reacts like a real acoustic instrument.
Tonality:
The SK-EX is lush, warm, and deeply expressive. The low end has real body, the mids are rounded and smooth, and the top end is delicate without being piercing. The piano sings more than it sparkles.
Classical players will love the dynamic range and tonal depth. It’s great for Chopin, Debussy, and anything that requires color and nuance. Jazz players will appreciate the body in the left hand and the softness available in upper voicings.
Even when played softly, the CN201 retains its tonal character. Quiet passages don’t sound thin or artificial—they sound intimate.
Room-Filling Sound vs. Headphones
A digital piano’s sound engine only tells half the story. The delivery system—how the sound is projected through speakers or headphones—is just as important.
YDP-165 Speakers:
- 2 x 20W speakers (built into the cabinet)
- No spatial or directional optimization
- No speaker box or diffuser
The Yamaha gets decently loud and has a nice stereo field, but the sound lacks body and can feel compressed, especially when pushed at high volumes. The midrange tends to dominate, and the bass lacks the presence you’d expect from a real piano.
When using headphones, the sound becomes cleaner but also more sterile. There’s no 3D imaging or spatial awareness—it’s a left/right feed with no simulation of how a piano interacts with a room.
CN201 Speakers:
- 2 x 20W speakers
- Improved cabinet voicing and resonance tuning
- Uses Low Volume Balance to maintain tonal quality at soft volumes
The CN201 offers similar wattage on paper, but the difference in speaker tuning is significant. The sound is fuller, more dimensional, and projects better into a room. It doesn’t just sound louder—it sounds richer.
Kawai also includes Spatial Headphone Sound (SHS), a feature that simulates the resonance and depth of a piano in a real space when you’re practicing with headphones. This adds immersion and realism and reduces ear fatigue during long practice sessions.
Preset Sounds & Variety
Neither piano offers a ton of voices—these are designed to be digital pianos, not synthesizers.
- YDP-165: 10 voices total, including a few electric pianos, organs, strings, and a harpsichord. They’re usable, but none stand out. They feel like afterthoughts.
- CN201: 19 voices, including two grand pianos, multiple EPs, harpsichord, organs, pads, and more. The second grand (Studio Grand) has a different flavor, and the EPs are actually decent—especially the DX-style electric piano.
While sound selection is not the main selling point for either model, Kawai offers more variety, and the quality across voices is consistently better.
Expressiveness and Dynamics
The Yamaha’s CFX sample responds well to dynamic playing but tends to jump between layers. You’ll notice it especially in pieces that require fine control—like slow Debussy or delicate fingerwork in jazz. The attack feels more digital, and expressive layering is more “stepped” than smooth.
In contrast, the CN201 allows gradual, seamless changes in tone. The warm character of the SK-EX lends itself to more emotive playing. Whether you’re playing pianissimo or fortissimo, the instrument gives back what you put in.
Who Each Piano’s Sound Suits Best
| Genre/Style | Yamaha YDP-165 | Kawai CN201 |
|---|---|---|
| Classical (Romantic) | Too bright, lacks nuance | Ideal—warm and expressive |
| Classical (Baroque) | Crisp, articulate | Slightly soft but still great |
| Jazz | Bright for comping | Warm, great for ballads |
| Pop/Rock | Bright, cuts through | Smooth, could be too mellow |
| Film/Impressionism | Lacks depth | Rich, textured, nuanced |
| Contemporary Piano | Clean, modern | Organic, intimate |
Final Verdict on Sound Engine & Tonality
Both Yamaha and Kawai have strong sound pedigrees—but in this head-to-head matchup, Kawai delivers a more immersive, expressive, and realistic sound experience.
The Yamaha YDP-165 offers a bright, punchy piano tone that works well for contemporary playing, and its CFX sample is still impressive given the price. But it lacks depth, realism, and subtlety. There’s no resonance modeling, no spatial processing, and dynamic expression is limited.
The Kawai CN201, on the other hand, provides a concert grand experience at home. The SK-EX sound engine, combined with advanced sampling and resonance features, offers tonal color, harmonic complexity, and dynamic range that far exceed expectations for a sub-$2,000 digital piano.
Verdict:
- Winner: Kawai CN201
- It’s not just better technically—it’s more emotionally engaging. You don’t just hear it—you feel it.
Would you like me to continue with the expanded “Speakers” section next, or create an infographic-style summary of these comparisons?
Speaker System
Speakers are often overlooked in digital piano comparisons—but they shouldn’t be. The speaker system is the final link in the chain between the instrument and your ears. You could have the most beautifully sampled grand piano tone, but if it comes out sounding tinny, flat, or underpowered, the magic is gone.
Both the Yamaha YDP-165 and Kawai CN201 are home digital pianos designed to fill a room with sound. They’re not meant for gigging or stage performance, but they should deliver a convincing, immersive acoustic piano experience in a living room or studio space.
So how do their speaker systems actually perform?
Let’s break it down.
Yamaha YDP-165: Functional But Unremarkable
On paper, the Yamaha YDP-165 sports a 2 x 20W stereo speaker system, with speakers embedded inside the cabinet and projecting downward. This is the same setup found in several Arius models going back years. Yamaha calls this the “Tone Escapement” design, which allows some sound to escape upward through the cabinet gap for a bit of acoustic spread.
Real-World Sound
The YDP-165 can fill a medium-sized room without trouble. At around 50–75% volume, you get enough loudness to simulate the presence of a small upright piano. The sound is clean, relatively balanced, and projects well for casual playing.
However, you’ll notice a few weaknesses:
- Bass response is somewhat lacking. The lower register doesn’t have the body or roundness you’d expect. Chords in the lower octaves sound flat and less impactful.
- Highs can sound a little sharp at higher volumes, especially if you’re playing percussive pieces or bright voicings.
- Midrange dominance means that a lot of the piano’s character sits in a narrow tonal band, making the instrument sound slightly compressed.
The cabinet doesn’t do much in terms of natural resonance or acoustic enhancement—it simply houses the speakers. As a result, the YDP-165 can sound a bit “boxy” compared to more advanced setups.
Sound Direction and Spread
Because the speakers are downward-firing and not angled or directed, the sound tends to pool near the base of the instrument. If you’re sitting at the bench, it sounds okay. If you’re standing or moving around the room, it lacks presence and dispersion.
Kawai CN201: Subtly Superior Execution
The Kawai CN201 also features a 2 x 20W stereo speaker system, similar in wattage to the Yamaha. But don’t let the identical power ratings fool you—Kawai’s speaker system is noticeably better in practice.
Better Tuning, Fuller Sound
What sets the CN201 apart is tuning and cabinet acoustics. Kawai has a long history of voicing their digital pianos to sound more like their acoustic counterparts. That attention to tone balance and spatial delivery makes a big difference.
Here’s what you notice immediately:
- The bass register is deeper and more resonant. When you play low chords or arpeggios, you can feel the low-end energy bloom into the room.
- The midrange is more natural—less congested or honky-sounding than on the Yamaha.
- The treble is smoother and never shrill, even when played loudly. There’s more harmonic content and less artificial “bite.”
Kawai also implements a feature called Low Volume Balance, which automatically rebalances EQ and dynamics when you play at softer volumes. This helps preserve detail, even during late-night practice when the volume is turned down. On the Yamaha, playing quietly often results in tonal flattening, where notes lose their nuance.
Speaker Positioning and Projection
Kawai designed the CN201’s speaker system to take better advantage of the cabinet’s acoustics. There’s a more even spread of sound throughout the room, thanks to improved speaker angling and internal baffling. You don’t just hear the piano—it occupies space. Even subtle stereo effects (like panning across octaves) come through more convincingly.
That makes a huge difference if you’re playing for an audience at home or recording yourself and want a more “roomy” sound without needing external monitors.
Headphone Experience
While not technically part of the speaker system, the headphone output and how it’s handled internally is crucial—especially for people who practice at night or live with others.
- Yamaha YDP-165 delivers a standard stereo headphone feed. It’s clean, but it sounds like audio piped directly into your ears. There’s no spatial modeling or sense of air. If you use headphones for long periods, it can get fatiguing.
- Kawai CN201 includes Spatial Headphone Sound (SHS), which simulates the feel of playing in a room—even when using headphones. It subtly shifts the soundstage to replicate the acoustics of a real piano, making the experience much more immersive. You get a sense of space, depth, and direction. It’s a small but impactful quality-of-life feature.
Practical Use Cases
Let’s talk real-world usage.
For Daily Practice
- Both are sufficient, but the CN201’s richer tonal balance and improved projection make long practice sessions more satisfying.
For Playing with Others (small audience or duet)
- The CN201’s speaker projection makes it easier to hear the piano from multiple angles or across the room.
For Home Recording
- While neither has line-in recording capabilities, the CN201’s more natural speaker sound helps when miking the instrument, and its USB audio support (not available on the YDP-165) lets you record digital audio directly to a DAW with more realism.
Final Verdict on Speaker System
On the spec sheet, these two pianos look similar—2 x 20W speakers, stereo sound, built-in cabinets. But the execution is what separates them.
- Yamaha YDP-165: Clean, usable, but unremarkable sound delivery. The tone is clear but lacks weight and dimension.
- Kawai CN201: Thoughtfully tuned speaker system that delivers warmth, clarity, and space. Richer bass, smoother highs, and better spatial presentation overall.
Verdict:
- Winner: Kawai CN201
- It just sounds better—more open, more realistic, and more emotionally engaging. If you plan to play often or want the most acoustic-like experience in a digital form, the speaker system in the CN201 is a quiet but important upgrade.
Features & Functions
When it comes to digital pianos, the core essentials—sound and keyboard feel—always come first. But in 2025, it’s fair to expect more. These are, after all, digital instruments, and their features and functions can significantly enhance or limit your playing experience, especially if you’re using the piano for practice, learning, teaching, recording, or casual jamming.
The Yamaha YDP-165 and Kawai CN201 both aim to deliver a simplified home piano experience, but they approach features very differently. One keeps things basic. The other opens up more possibilities.
Let’s walk through what each piano offers—and what it lacks—so you can see which one fits your musical life better.
Yamaha YDP-165: Focused, but Minimal
Yamaha has always leaned toward a “piano-first” philosophy with the Arius line, and the YDP-165 is no exception. It’s clearly built for players who want to sit down and play, without navigating menus or messing with tech.
That’s both a strength and a limitation.
Core Modes
- Dual Mode: Layer two sounds together (e.g., piano + strings)
- Duo Mode: Splits the keyboard into two equal ranges for student/teacher duet playing
That’s it. No split mode (bass in left hand, piano in right), and no user-customizable zones.
Voices
The YDP-165 comes with 10 preset voices:
- 3 acoustic pianos (CFX Grand, Mellow, Pop)
- 2 electric pianos
- 2 organs
- Strings
- Vibraphone
- Harpsichord
The sounds are decent, but the selection is basic. There’s little variety, and no ability to tweak or fine-tune voices beyond layering them. Also, you can’t save custom setups or registrations.
Recording & Playback
- The YDP-165 offers basic 2-track MIDI recording (1 song).
- You can record left and right hands separately and play them back, but you can’t save multiple songs or export them directly via USB to a drive.
- There’s no audio recording. If you want to capture audio, you’ll need to use external equipment or run the headphone out to a recorder.
Metronome & Practice Tools
- Built-in metronome (adjustable tempo and time signature)
- Transpose and tuning functions
- Fixed tempo—no rhythm accompaniments or backing tracks
These tools are functional but barebones. There’s no onboard lesson system, no rhythms or patterns to practice with, and no internal teaching functions.
App Integration
The YDP-165 supports Yamaha’s Smart Pianist app, which adds a more modern interface and the ability to control sounds, settings, and even display sheet music or chord symbols from your device.
However, there’s a catch:
- You need a USB cable to connect (no Bluetooth).
- The experience depends heavily on your mobile device.
- There’s no MIDI over Bluetooth and no Bluetooth Audio.
In short, Yamaha’s approach is functional, stable, and very piano-centric. But it lacks flexibility and modern convenience, especially when compared to its Kawai competitor.
Kawai CN201: More Modern, More Capable
The CN201 leans into digital functionality more confidently. It retains a piano-first feel but adds thoughtful features that enhance learning, performance, and connectivity.
Core Modes
- Dual Mode: Layer any two voices
- Split Mode: Assign different voices to left and right hands
- Four Hands Mode: Same as Yamaha’s Duo mode for teaching/duet play
Split mode is a big win here. It allows you to assign a bass or pad to the left hand while soloing or comping with your right—useful for jazz, worship music, or casual jamming.
Voices
The CN201 comes with 19 high-quality sounds:
- 2 acoustic grands (SK-EX Concert and Studio)
- 3 electric pianos (tine, FM, soft)
- Jazz organ, church organ, harpsichord
- Choir, pads, strings, and more
The sound quality across the board is higher than Yamaha’s. The variety is also more usable, and you can layer or split almost any combination. Kawai’s sounds feel less like filler and more like real, expressive instruments.
Recording & Playback
This is a huge advantage:
- 3-song MIDI recorder with 10,000-note memory
- USB-to-device port for saving MIDI files to a USB stick
- Optional USB audio output for clean digital recording to a DAW
With the CN201, you can record directly to a USB drive and transfer it to a computer. You can also connect the piano via USB to your DAW (GarageBand, Logic, FL Studio) and record audio directly—no interface needed. The YDP-165 doesn’t support this at all.
Metronome & Practice Tools
- Built-in metronome with tempo/time signature options
- 40 concert etudes and Burgmüller exercises built in
- Transpose and tuning control
- Virtual Technician app lets you tweak voicing, damper noise, key-off behavior, and more
If you’re a student or teacher, the CN201 is just more versatile. Built-in lesson content and tone shaping tools allow for deeper musical exploration.
Display and Navigation
The CN201 features a small OLED screen that makes navigating sounds, settings, and menus much easier. The screen is intuitive and clear—no cryptic button/key combinations to memorize like on the Yamaha.
This is a subtle but important win. Want to turn on Bluetooth? Change split zones? Load a lesson song? You can do all that with just a few button presses and clear feedback on the screen.
App Integration
Kawai offers two main apps:
- PianoRemote – Control every function wirelessly via Bluetooth
- Virtual Technician – Deep editing of piano touch, resonance, and voicing
Both apps connect over Bluetooth MIDI. No cables needed. And the CN201 also supports Bluetooth Audio, allowing you to stream songs or backing tracks from your phone or tablet directly to the piano’s speakers.
Imagine playing along with YouTube backing tracks or Spotify playlists wirelessly. This is a game-changer for practice and performance.
Head-to-Head Comparison: Features
| Feature | Yamaha YDP-165 | Kawai CN201 |
|---|---|---|
| Voices | 10 | 19 |
| Modes (Layer, Split, Duo) | Layer, Duo only | Layer, Split, Duo |
| Display | None | OLED Screen |
| MIDI Recorder | 1 song, 2 tracks | 3 songs, USB saving |
| USB Audio | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth MIDI | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth Audio | No | Yes |
| USB-to-Device | No | Yes (USB stick support) |
| Onboard Lesson Songs | No | Yes |
| Virtual Piano Customization | No | Yes (via app) |
| Metronome | Yes | Yes |
| App Integration | Wired only (Smart Pianist) | Wireless (PianoRemote) |
Who Benefits Most?
- YDP-165 is good for players who:
- Want a simple, “turn it on and play” experience
- Don’t care about features beyond the basics
- Use the piano for solo practice only
- CN201 is ideal for:
- Students who want built-in tools and songs
- Teachers who need split/duo functions
- Casual home players who want Bluetooth streaming
- Anyone recording or playing along with tracks
Final Verdict on Features & Functions
The YDP-165 offers a streamlined, classic digital piano experience—but that also means it’s limited. It has no Bluetooth, no USB audio, no lesson songs, no split mode, and no display. If you’re a beginner who just wants a clean, piano-like feel and sound, it might work. But if you want modern convenience or flexibility, it feels outdated.
The CN201 embraces what a digital piano can be. It’s more than a piano—it’s a versatile music hub. You get a bigger, more expressive sound palette, onboard recording with USB export, full Bluetooth support, better practice tools, and customizable piano behavior.
Verdict:
- Winner: Kawai CN201
- It’s not just more capable—it’s more forward-thinking and fun to use, especially in a connected, tech-savvy world.
Connectivity
Connectivity might sound like a technical afterthought, but in today’s world, it’s central to how we use digital instruments. Whether you’re recording, learning, practicing with apps, using backing tracks, teaching remotely, or just streaming music to play along, a digital piano’s connectivity options can greatly impact its usefulness and lifespan.
This is one of the most lopsided battles between the Yamaha YDP-165 and the Kawai CN201. Yamaha sticks to its traditionalist roots with minimal I/O, while Kawai leans into modern flexibility.
Let’s break it down piece by piece.
USB Connectivity
Yamaha YDP-165
The YDP-165 includes a USB to Host port that allows the piano to function as a MIDI controller when connected to a computer or mobile device. This means you can:
- Use the YDP-165 to control virtual instruments in a DAW like GarageBand, Logic, or Ableton
- Interface with Yamaha’s Smart Pianist app (requires USB camera adapter for iOS)
But it’s strictly MIDI over USB—there’s no audio transmission. If you want to record audio from the YDP-165, you’ll need to route the headphone jack into an audio interface and deal with gain staging, conversion, and potential noise issues.
Kawai CN201
The CN201 also features USB to Host, but it supports both MIDI and audio transmission. This is a huge step up.
With USB Audio:
- You can connect the piano directly to a DAW and record clean, uncompressed digital audio
- No need for an external interface or analog cabling
- You also retain full MIDI functionality for sequencing and virtual instrument control
Additionally, the CN201 includes a USB to Device port. This allows you to:
- Save and load MIDI recordings directly to and from a USB flash drive
- Play SMF (Standard MIDI Files) from USB
- Update the piano’s firmware easily
Yamaha omits this feature completely.
USB Verdict:
- Yamaha YDP-165: MIDI only, limited
- Kawai CN201: MIDI + Audio, direct-to-USB recording, broader use case
Bluetooth Capabilities
This is where the gap widens even more.
Yamaha YDP-165
The YDP-165 has no Bluetooth of any kind:
- No Bluetooth MIDI
- No Bluetooth Audio
That means:
- You must use a USB cable to connect to apps like Smart Pianist or Flowkey
- You cannot stream backing tracks or music to the piano’s speakers
- You cannot use the piano wirelessly with notation apps, DAWs, or Bluetooth MIDI controllers
While Yamaha’s higher-end Clavinova models do support Bluetooth, this functionality is completely missing on the YDP-165.
Kawai CN201
The CN201 includes both:
- Bluetooth MIDI: Wirelessly connect to apps for notation, learning, or remote control
- Bluetooth Audio: Stream any audio (Spotify, YouTube, backing tracks) through the piano’s internal speakers
This makes a real difference in daily use:
- Want to play along with YouTube tutorials? Done.
- Want to jam over a jazz backing track from your phone? Easy.
- Using iPad notation apps like MuseScore or Notion? No wires needed.
Kawai also supports PianoRemote and Virtual Technician apps over Bluetooth, allowing you to adjust voices, set split zones, or tweak the piano’s behavior in real time without touching a cable.
Bluetooth Verdict:
- Yamaha YDP-165: None
- Kawai CN201: Full Bluetooth MIDI + Audio
Headphone Outputs
Both pianos have dual headphone jacks, allowing for silent practice:
- Yamaha YDP-165: 2 x ¼-inch stereo jacks
- Kawai CN201: 2 x ¼-inch stereo jacks
This is great for:
- Teacher-student setups
- Duets in silent mode
- Practicing without disturbing others
However, the experience is not equal.
Yamaha’s Headphone Output
It’s serviceable but basic. There’s no spatial processing, so the sound feels “in your head.” It can be fatiguing over long sessions, and dynamics often feel compressed compared to using the speakers.
Kawai’s Headphone Output
Kawai includes Spatial Headphone Sound (SHS), a subtle spatial processing algorithm that gives you a room-like soundstage when playing with headphones. It simulates the natural reflections and spread of a real piano in a space. The result is a more immersive, less fatiguing experience—especially helpful for nighttime practice or long rehearsals.
Headphone Verdict:
- Yamaha YDP-165: Standard stereo, nothing special
- Kawai CN201: Enhanced with spatial processing
Audio Output & External Amplification
Yamaha YDP-165
Here’s where the YDP-165 stumbles again: it has no dedicated line outputs. If you want to connect to an amplifier, PA system, or audio interface, your only option is to:
- Use the headphone output (which is unbalanced and less clean)
- Get adapters or splitters, which can reduce audio quality
This isn’t ideal for live settings or recording environments.
Kawai CN201
The CN201 includes dedicated line outputs (stereo ¼” jacks), meaning:
- You can connect directly to external speakers without disrupting the headphone jack
- You get a cleaner, stronger signal suitable for recording or live use
This opens up the CN201 to broader use: teaching studios, hybrid setups, live PA systems, or home audio integration.
Line Out Verdict:
- Yamaha YDP-165: No line outs
- Kawai CN201: Dedicated stereo line outs
App Integration
Yamaha YDP-165
- Uses Smart Pianist, a polished and well-designed app that allows:
- Voice selection
- Sound layering
- Score display
- Song analysis
But it requires a wired USB connection. There’s no remote control unless you’re plugged in, and no wireless music streaming.
Kawai CN201
- Supports two wireless apps:
- PianoRemote: Simple UI to change voices, adjust metronome, access songs, etc.
- Virtual Technician: Customize voicing, tuning, hammer and damper noise, and more
Both apps work over Bluetooth, meaning no cables are needed, and the whole process is more convenient. While not as visually polished as Yamaha’s app, Kawai’s tools are far more powerful under the hood—especially for advanced users who like tweaking.
App Verdict:
- Yamaha YDP-165: Better UI, but limited and wired-only
- Kawai CN201: Wireless control, deep editing, more functional
Connectivity for the Real World
Let’s imagine three scenarios:
- Home Studio Setup
- The CN201 fits right in with USB Audio and line outs. You can record clean piano tracks directly into a DAW.
- The YDP-165 requires extra gear (audio interface + cabling) and still lacks Bluetooth Audio.
- Teaching Environment
- CN201 allows for Bluetooth app control and dual headphones, plus you can send recordings to a USB stick.
- YDP-165 offers basic teaching tools, but lacks any real connectivity to streamline lessons.
- Learning at Home with Apps
- The CN201 connects wirelessly to flowkey, Simply Piano, or YouTube.
- The YDP-165 needs a wired connection and doesn’t support Bluetooth audio playback at all.
Final Verdict on Connectivity
This category is a landslide win for Kawai. The CN201 is a connected, modern instrument with every port and protocol you could reasonably need for a home or teaching setup. It’s ready for the way we play and learn music now.
The YDP-165, by comparison, feels stuck in the past. No Bluetooth, no USB Audio, no line outs, no USB stick support. It works—but only just.
Verdict:
- Winner: Kawai CN201
- It’s better equipped, more flexible, and future-ready. The connectivity options on the CN201 add real, practical value.
Value for Money
When you’re spending between $1,500 and $1,800 on a digital piano, you’re not making an impulse buy—you’re making a medium-term investment in your playing, your practice environment, and your musical growth. At this price range, you expect more than just basic functionality. You want an instrument that feels good, sounds great, and won’t leave you wanting to upgrade after six months.
So how do the Yamaha YDP-165 and Kawai CN201 compare when it comes to value for money?
Let’s get straight to it: the Kawai CN201 is more expensive—by around $200. But price alone doesn’t determine value. What really matters is what you’re getting for your money.
Let’s examine the return on investment in terms of key categories.
1. Price Breakdown (Typical Street Prices)
- Yamaha YDP-165:
~$1,499 – $1,599 depending on finish
(White and white ash versions tend to cost slightly more) - Kawai CN201:
~$1,699 – $1,799 depending on finish
(White finish usually at the top of the price range)
So yes, the CN201 is typically $150–$200 more. That’s not insignificant—but it’s also not a deal-breaker, especially if the extra cost translates into better performance and longevity.
2. Long-Term Usability
Let’s be honest: some digital pianos, while fine for beginners, outgrow their usefulness as your skills develop. The YDP-165 is a solid beginner-to-intermediate piano, but there’s a ceiling. Once your technique improves or you start working on more nuanced repertoire, the GHS key action and lack of sound modeling become limitations.
In contrast, the CN201 is built to scale with your progress. The superior RHC III action, more advanced sound engine, and higher-quality speaker system all support serious intermediate and even advanced practice.
In other words, the CN201 is less likely to need replacing after a year or two. That means more value in the long run, especially if you’re committed to learning.
3. Feature-to-Price Ratio
If we break down what you get per dollar spent, Kawai gives you more piano for your money:
| Feature | YDP-165 ($1,499) | CN201 ($1,699) |
|---|---|---|
| Key Action | GHS (entry-level) | RHC III (mid-tier) |
| Sound Engine | CFX Grand sample, basic | SK-EX, with resonance |
| Bluetooth MIDI & Audio | No | Yes |
| USB Audio | No | Yes |
| Line Outputs | No | Yes |
| Lesson Songs | No | Yes |
| Customization | None | Virtual Technician app |
| App Control | Wired only | Wireless (Bluetooth) |
| Headphone Spatial Processing | No | Yes |
| Speaker System Quality | Basic | Better-tuned, richer |
For $200 more, you’re getting:
- A better key action (feels more like an acoustic)
- A richer, more expressive sound
- Modern Bluetooth features
- More flexibility for recording and external audio use
- Longer-lasting relevance as you progress
Put simply, the CN201 includes features that Yamaha charges more for in its higher-end Clavinova line.
4. Who Gets More Out of the Purchase?
Let’s look at different types of buyers:
Beginners
- If you’re just starting out, the YDP-165 is adequate. But you’ll hit its limitations sooner.
- The CN201 may cost more, but it actually helps develop proper technique faster due to its superior action and dynamics.
Intermediate Players
- This is where the CN201 clearly wins. The dynamic range, voicing, and control it offers are miles ahead.
- You’ll appreciate the additional features and tonal complexity as your playing matures.
Teachers and Studios
- The CN201 has real teaching tools: lesson songs, split mode, better headphone sound, line outs, USB recording, etc.
- Yamaha’s simpler feature set limits its flexibility in a studio or teaching environment.
Hobbyists & Casual Players
- If you just want a good-sounding piano to relax with occasionally, either will work.
- But if you value sound quality, ease of use, or want to occasionally play along with backing tracks, the CN201 is much more versatile.
5. Cost of Ownership & Upgrading
Digital pianos typically last 5–10 years, but whether you want to keep it that long depends on how it meets your needs.
The YDP-165 could end up as a transitional instrument—something you eventually sell or upgrade from. That makes its long-term value lower.
The CN201 has much more staying power. It can be your primary instrument for years, especially if you’re not planning to transition to an acoustic upright. This makes its higher upfront cost a smarter long-term investment.
6. Resale Value & Brand Trust
Both Yamaha and Kawai have excellent reputations and resale value. Yamaha, as a brand, is more widely recognized by the general public, which can slightly boost resale potential for casual buyers.
However, among musicians and educators, Kawai has a stronger reputation for key action and realism in this segment. So if you ever sell the CN201 on a musician marketplace or locally to a serious player, it may hold value equally well—or even better.
7. Intangible Value: Enjoyment and Frustration
This is a point that doesn’t show up in a spec sheet.
When you sit down to play:
- The CN201 feels more rewarding. The tone is more moving. The keys respond more like a real instrument. Practicing is more enjoyable.
- The YDP-165 feels more limited. It’s still good, but you notice its boundaries more quickly—especially with headphones, advanced dynamics, or faster pieces.
The value here is emotional: the CN201 delivers more joy per note played. That’s hard to quantify—but very real.
Final Verdict on Value for Money
The Yamaha YDP-165 is a decent digital piano. It gives you a trusted brand, a clean design, and a simple user experience. For players on a strict budget who prioritize Yamaha’s bright CFX tone and don’t need bells and whistles, it’s a fair buy.
But the Kawai CN201 is the better value in almost every way. For just a bit more money, you get:
- A much better key action
- A more expressive and immersive sound engine
- Full modern connectivity
- More built-in tools for learning and teaching
- A longer-lasting instrument that scales with your skill
Verdict:
- Winner: Kawai CN201
- It gives you more piano, more tech, more control, and more long-term satisfaction for a modest increase in cost.
Final Verdict
After comparing the Yamaha YDP-165 and the Kawai CN201 across every critical category—keyboard action, sound engine, speakers, features, connectivity, and overall value—it’s clear that Kawai’s CN201 is the more capable and future-proof instrument.
The Yamaha YDP-165 isn’t a bad piano by any means. It’s reliable, well-built, and offers a clean, traditional experience. Yamaha’s CFX grand sample has a bright, clear tone that suits many players, and the simplified control layout makes it a breeze to use. But it also shows its age. The GHS key action is basic, the features are minimal, and the complete lack of Bluetooth or USB audio limits its integration into modern workflows.
The Kawai CN201, meanwhile, delivers a fuller package in nearly every respect. Its Responsive Hammer Compact III action is more refined and responsive, its SK-EX sound engine is deeper and more expressive, and the addition of real-time resonance modeling brings the sound closer to an acoustic piano. It also includes Bluetooth MIDI and Audio, USB audio out, line outputs, a better-tuned speaker system, onboard lesson songs, and real-time app control—all for a price only slightly above the YDP-165.
For beginners, both pianos are viable, but the CN201 offers more room to grow. For intermediate or returning players, the CN201 provides the realism and flexibility needed to keep up with advancing skill. And for teachers or tech-savvy musicians, it’s simply the more modern and useful tool.
Final Call:
- If you want a simple piano and love Yamaha’s sound, the YDP-165 will do the job.
- But if you want the best musical experience under $2,000—and a piano that won’t limit you—the Kawai CN201 is hands-down the smarter investment.