If you’re in the market for a solid mid-range digital piano, chances are you’ve come across the Yamaha YDP-165 and the Roland F701. Both of these instruments are targeted at intermediate and advanced players who want an authentic piano feel and high-quality sound in a home-friendly package. But which one is the better choice for you?
In this detailed comparison, I’ll break down every crucial aspect of these two digital pianos—design, keyboard feel, sound quality, speaker system, functions, connectivity, and value for money—to help you make the best choice for your needs.
Yamaha YDP-165 vs. Roland F701 Comparison Chart
This table provides a side-by-side comparison of the key specifications and features of the Yamaha YDP-165 and Roland F701, helping you quickly determine which digital piano is best suited for your needs.
If you click the links below, under the product images you will be redirected to Amazon.com. In case you then decide to buy anything, Amazon.com will pay me a commission. This doesn’t affect the honesty of this review in any way though.
| Feature | Yamaha YDP-165 | Roland F701 |
|---|---|---|
 |  | |
| Price | Check the best price on Amazon | Check the best price on Amazon |
| Key Action | Graded Hammer 3 (GH3) | PHA-4 Standard |
| Key Surface | Synthetic Ivory & Ebony | Synthetic Ivory |
| Escapement Simulation | ❌ No | ✅ Yes |
| Number of Keys | 88 | 88 |
| Touch Sensitivity Levels | 3 levels + Fixed | 5 levels + Fixed |
| Sound Engine | Yamaha CFX Grand Sampling | SuperNATURAL Piano Modeling |
| Polyphony | 192 notes | 256 notes |
| Number of Instrument Sounds | 10 | 324 |
| Speaker System | 2 x 20W (40W total) | 2 x 12W (24W total) |
| Sound Projection | Downward-facing speakers | Upward-facing speakers |
| Reverb Effects | 4 types | Ambience Effect |
| Chorus & Modulation Effects | ❌ No | ✅ Yes |
| Brilliance Control | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Recording Capability | 2-track MIDI recording | MIDI & USB Audio Recording |
| USB to Host (MIDI) | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| USB Audio Interface | ❌ No | ✅ Yes |
| Bluetooth MIDI | ❌ No | ✅ Yes |
| Bluetooth Audio | ⚠️ Only in some regions | ✅ Yes |
| Headphone Jacks | 2 (1/4″ only) | 2 (1/4″ + 1/8″) |
| Line Out (for External Speakers) | ❌ No (must use headphone jack) | ✅ Yes (1/4″ Stereo Output) |
| App Compatibility | Smart Pianist (USB connection required) | Piano Every Day (Bluetooth MIDI support) |
| Pedals | 3 (Soft, Sostenuto, Damper with Half-Pedal) | 3 (Soft, Sostenuto, Damper with Half-Pedal) |
| Metronome | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Transpose Function | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Layer Mode (Dual Sound) | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Split Mode (Different Sounds on Left & Right Hands) | ❌ No | ✅ Yes |
| Duo Mode (Twin Piano for Duets) | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| User Interface | Button-based, no screen | OLED Display with buttons & dial |
| Available Colors | Black, White, Rosewood, Dark Walnut | Black, White, Light Oak |
| Dimensions (Width x Depth x Height) | 1357 x 422 x 849 mm (53.4″ x 16.6″ x 33.4″) | 1360 x 345 x 781 mm (53.5″ x 13.6″ x 30.7″) |
| Weight | 42 kg (92.6 lbs) | 36 kg (79.3 lbs) |
| My individual reviews | Yamaha YDP-165 review | Roland F701 review |
Key Takeaways from the Comparison Table:
- 🎹 Key Action: Yamaha YDP-165 has a heavier feel (GH3), while the Roland F701 is lighter and more responsive (PHA-4 Standard with escapement).
- 🎵 Sound Engine: Yamaha’s CFX Grand sample is warm and classical, while Roland’s SuperNATURAL is brighter and more expressive.
- 🔊 Speakers: Yamaha (40W) is louder and richer in bass, while Roland (24W) provides a clearer, more balanced projection.
- 🔌 Connectivity: Roland F701 wins with Bluetooth MIDI, USB Audio Interface, and Line Out—features missing from the Yamaha YDP-165.
- 🎼 Instrument Sounds: Roland F701 offers 324 sounds, compared to Yamaha’s 10, making it better for multi-genre musicians.
- 📏 Size & Weight: Roland F701 is more compact and lighter, making it better for small spaces.
Final Verdict
- ✅ Choose the Yamaha YDP-165 if you want a more traditional feel, stronger built-in speakers, and a warm classical piano sound.
- ✅ Choose the Roland F701 if you need better connectivity, more instrument sounds, Bluetooth, a compact design, and a more expressive sound engine.
Design & Build Quality
When choosing a digital piano for home use, design and build quality matter more than you might initially think. A digital piano is not just an instrument—it’s also a piece of furniture that will likely be a permanent fixture in your home. Both the Yamaha YDP-165 and the Roland F701 offer aesthetically pleasing designs, but they take very different approaches in terms of style, materials, and practicality.
In this section, we’ll go deep into how these two pianos compare in terms of:
- Aesthetics (how they look)
- Build quality and materials (how durable they are)
- Size and weight (how much space they take up)
- Practical features (such as key covers and stands)
By the end of this section, you’ll have a clear idea of which digital piano fits better in your space and matches your personal taste.
Aesthetics: Traditional vs. Modern
Yamaha YDP-165 – Classic & Elegant
The Yamaha YDP-165 is designed to resemble an upright acoustic piano, making it a great choice for those who appreciate a traditional aesthetic. If you want a digital piano that blends seamlessly into a classic living room or music studio, this one does the job beautifully.
- The full cabinet design mimics a standard upright piano, giving it a premium, sophisticated look.
- The key cover slides smoothly, protecting the keys when not in use.
- The overall shape is sturdy and solid, with a wide base that enhances stability.
Yamaha offers the YDP-165 in four color options:
- Black – A sleek, polished look that fits well in modern or classic home décor.
- White – A bright, fresh option for contemporary interiors.
- Rosewood – A deep, rich woodgrain finish that adds warmth to the room.
- Dark Walnut – A darker wood finish that blends beautifully with other wooden furniture.
✅ Best for: Traditionalists who want their digital piano to look and feel like a real acoustic upright.
Roland F701 – Modern & Minimalist
The Roland F701 takes a completely different approach. Instead of imitating a classic upright piano, Roland has designed this model to be a sleek, space-saving instrument with clean lines and a minimalist aesthetic. If you live in a modern apartment, small studio, or contemporary home, the F701’s design might be the better fit.
- The thin, streamlined body makes it feel light and elegant.
- The angled front panel and subtle curves give it a fresh, contemporary look.
- The key cover folds down into the body, giving it an even more minimalistic appearance when closed.
Roland offers the F701 in three color options:
- Black – A classic choice that adds sophistication.
- White – A modern, stylish option that blends well in bright rooms.
- Light Oak – A warm, Scandinavian-style finish for those who prefer natural tones.
✅ Best for: Modernists who want a compact, stylish digital piano that doesn’t overpower their space.
Build Quality & Materials: Sturdiness vs. Lightness
A digital piano isn’t just about looks—it also needs to be sturdy and durable, especially if it’s going to be used regularly. Let’s break down how Yamaha and Roland compare in terms of materials, structure, and durability.
Yamaha YDP-165 – Heavy, Sturdy & Traditional
One of the first things you’ll notice about the YDP-165 is its solid construction. Yamaha has designed this model to be heavy and robust, which gives it a premium feel and long-lasting durability.
- The main cabinet is made from engineered wood, which is heavier and sturdier than plastic-based alternatives.
- The thicker side panels and backboard add stability, preventing wobbling or shaking during play.
- The pedal unit is built into the frame, making it feel secure and reliable.
This sturdiness does come at a cost: the YDP-165 is heavy, weighing 42 kg (92.6 lbs). That’s not an issue if you’re setting it up in one place permanently, but if you ever need to move it, you’ll need an extra pair of hands.
✅ Best for: Players who want a solid, substantial piano that doesn’t move or shake while playing.
Roland F701 – Lightweight & Space-Saving
In contrast, the Roland F701 is designed to be lightweight and compact, making it a great choice for smaller spaces.
- It uses a combination of wood and high-quality plastic, which helps keep the weight down while maintaining durability.
- The thinner side panels and frame make it feel less bulky than the YDP-165.
- The pedal unit is attached separately, rather than being fully integrated into the cabinet.
The Roland F701 weighs 36 kg (79.3 lbs), which is noticeably lighter than the YDP-165. This makes it easier to assemble and move, especially if you live in an apartment or frequently rearrange your space.
✅ Best for: Those who want a lightweight, easy-to-move piano that still feels solid and well-built.
Size & Space Considerations
If you’re tight on space, the dimensions of each piano will be an important factor.
| Model | Width | Depth | Height | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yamaha YDP-165 | 1357 mm (53.4”) | 422 mm (16.6”) | 849 mm (33.4”) | 42 kg (92.6 lbs) |
| Roland F701 | 1360 mm (53.5”) | 345 mm (13.6”) | 781 mm (30.7”) | 36 kg (79.3 lbs) |
🔹 The Roland F701 is significantly shallower (345 mm vs. 422 mm), making it much better for small rooms or against tight walls.
🔹 The Yamaha YDP-165 is taller (849 mm vs. 781 mm), which gives it a more traditional upright piano look but makes it feel larger.
✅ Best for Small Spaces: Roland F701
✅ Best for a Classic Piano Setup: Yamaha YDP-165
Practical Features: Key Covers & Pedals
Yamaha YDP-165
- Sliding key cover protects the keys from dust when not in use.
- Integrated 3-pedal system (damper, sostenuto, soft) with half-pedal functionality.
Roland F701
- Folding key cover disappears into the piano, making it look even more minimalistic.
- Separate 3-pedal unit, slightly less integrated but still fully functional.
✅ Best for Protection: Yamaha YDP-165
✅ Best for Minimalist Design: Roland F701
Final Verdict: Which Piano Has Better Design & Build?
- Choose the Yamaha YDP-165 if you want a classic, substantial, and durable piano that looks and feels like a traditional upright.
- Choose the Roland F701 if you prefer a modern, space-saving, and lightweight piano that fits well in contemporary homes.
Both are well-built and aesthetically pleasing, but your choice will depend on your home style and space needs!
Keyboard Action & Feel
The keyboard action is arguably the most important aspect of any digital piano. A good key action not only determines how realistic and enjoyable the playing experience is but also affects how well the instrument responds to different styles of music. Both the Yamaha YDP-165 and the Roland F701 offer fully weighted key actions, but they feel noticeably different due to their unique technologies.
In this in-depth comparison, we’ll analyze:
- The key action mechanisms (how the keys feel and respond)
- Key weight and resistance (whether they feel light or heavy)
- Key surfaces and materials (which affects grip and comfort)
- Responsiveness and dynamic control (how well they react to fast or soft playing)
- Which piano is better suited for different playing styles
By the end of this section, you’ll have a solid understanding of which piano’s keyboard action fits your playing style best.
Understanding Digital Piano Key Actions
Before we dive into the specifics of the Yamaha YDP-165 and Roland F701, let’s quickly cover what key action is and why it matters.
Acoustic pianos use a hammer mechanism where pressing a key moves a hammer that strikes a string, producing sound. This system naturally creates heavier keys in the lower register and lighter keys in the higher register, something digital pianos try to replicate.
Digital pianos use weighted key actions to simulate this feel. The best digital pianos will have graded hammer actions, meaning that the lower keys feel heavier and gradually become lighter as you move up the keyboard—just like a real acoustic piano.
Both the Yamaha YDP-165 and the Roland F701 use graded hammer actions, but they approach it in different ways.
Yamaha YDP-165: Graded Hammer 3 (GH3) Action
The YDP-165 is equipped with Yamaha’s GH3 (Graded Hammer 3) action, which is a fully weighted, graded key action designed to feel as close as possible to an acoustic piano. Yamaha has been a leader in acoustic and digital piano manufacturing, so it’s no surprise that the GH3 action is well-regarded.
How the GH3 Action Works
- The GH3 system uses three sensors per key, which means that repeated notes can be played quickly and accurately. This is useful for pieces with rapid note repetition, such as Chopin’s Etudes or jazz improvisation.
- Since it’s a graded action, the lower notes feel heavier while the higher notes feel lighter, just like an acoustic piano.
- The keys are individually weighted, meaning that each key has a slightly different response, adding to the realism.
Key Weight & Resistance: Heavier, More Substantial Feel
The GH3 action is known for being heavier than most digital piano key actions, making it feel closer to a real acoustic upright or grand piano.
✅ Best for pianists who:
- Are used to playing on acoustic pianos and want a similar key weight.
- Prefer a more substantial key feel (especially for classical music).
- Want precise control when playing soft or loud dynamics.
❌ May not be ideal for:
- Beginners who aren’t used to heavy keys (it might feel tiring).
- Players who prefer a lighter, faster key action for jazz or pop music.
Roland F701: PHA-4 Standard Action
The Roland F701 features Roland’s PHA-4 Standard key action, which is also a fully weighted, graded hammer action but with some differences compared to Yamaha’s GH3. Roland’s digital piano key actions are praised for their speed and expressiveness, making them popular among players who want a lighter touch while still maintaining an acoustic-like feel.
How the PHA-4 Standard Action Works
- The PHA-4 system also has graded hammer weighting, meaning the lower notes feel heavier and the upper notes feel lighter, just like an acoustic piano.
- Escapement simulation is built in, which recreates the slight “notch” feeling that you get when pressing keys slowly on a grand piano. This adds to the realism.
- Triple sensor detection allows for rapid note repetition and fast response.
Key Weight & Resistance: Lighter, Faster Response
The PHA-4 Standard action feels lighter than Yamaha’s GH3 action, making it a better fit for jazz, pop, and fast playing styles. While it still has the weight of an acoustic piano, it is not as heavy as the YDP-165’s GH3.
✅ Best for pianists who:
- Prefer a lighter touch and more responsive keys.
- Play fast-paced music like jazz or pop.
- Want an easier transition from unweighted or semi-weighted keyboards.
❌ May not be ideal for:
- Classical pianists who are used to heavier keys.
- Those who prefer a more “substantial” key weight under their fingers.
Key Surface & Materials
The texture of the keys matters a lot for grip, comfort, and overall playing experience. Both Yamaha and Roland have implemented synthetic key surfaces to replicate the feel of real ivory and ebony.
Yamaha YDP-165: Synthetic Ivory & Ebony Keytops
Yamaha’s GH3 keys have a textured, matte surface that mimics the feel of real ivory and ebony found on acoustic pianos.
- This texture absorbs moisture, preventing fingers from slipping during long playing sessions.
- The ebony-colored black keys and ivory-colored white keys give the keyboard a premium, realistic look.
✅ Best for: Players who want an authentic acoustic feel under their fingers.
Roland F701: Synthetic Ivory Keytops
Roland’s PHA-4 Standard keys also have synthetic ivory surfaces, but they feel slightly smoother than Yamaha’s GH3.
- The texture is subtle, giving a balance between grip and smoothness.
- The black keys have a mild matte finish, which helps with grip but isn’t as textured as Yamaha’s.
✅ Best for: Players who prefer a modern key feel with a slightly smoother surface.
Responsiveness & Dynamic Control
How well does each piano respond to soft and loud playing?
Yamaha YDP-165 – Excellent Dynamic Control
- Heavier keys = better control for soft playing
- Works well for classical and expressive music
Roland F701 – Faster & More Responsive
- Lighter keys = quicker action for fast passages
- Ideal for jazz, pop, and contemporary music
Which One is Best for You?
Choose the Yamaha YDP-165 if:
✅ You want a heavier, more realistic acoustic piano feel.
✅ You play classical music or need precise control over dynamics.
✅ You prefer a textured key surface for better grip.
Choose the Roland F701 if:
✅ You want a lighter, faster key action.
✅ You play jazz, pop, or fast-paced music.
✅ You like a smoother, modern key feel.
Ultimately, it comes down to personal preference. If you’re used to acoustic pianos, the Yamaha YDP-165 will feel more familiar. If you want a faster and more responsive key action, the Roland F701 is the better choice.
Sound Quality & Piano Tones
The sound quality of a digital piano is one of its most critical aspects. No matter how good the keyboard action feels, if the sound is weak, artificial, or uninspiring, the playing experience won’t be enjoyable. Both the Yamaha YDP-165 and Roland F701 offer high-quality piano sounds, but they take very different approaches when it comes to tone, realism, and overall sound characteristics.
In this in-depth comparison, we’ll break down:
- How each piano generates sound (sampling vs. modeling)
- The tone and character of the main piano sounds
- Resonance and realism (including string resonance, damper resonance, and key noise)
- Polyphony (how many notes can be played simultaneously)
- Additional instrument sounds beyond the main piano voice
- Which piano is better suited for different playing styles and genres
By the end of this section, you’ll have a clear understanding of which piano’s sound engine will best suit your musical needs.
How Each Piano Produces Sound
There are two primary ways digital pianos generate sound: sampling and modeling.
- Sampling – The piano records (or “samples”) the sound of a real acoustic piano and plays back those recordings when you press a key.
- Modeling – Instead of using recordings, the piano generates sound dynamically using algorithms to recreate the behavior of an acoustic piano in real-time.
Let’s see how the Yamaha YDP-165 and Roland F701 use these technologies.
Yamaha YDP-165: CFX Grand Piano Sampling
The Yamaha YDP-165 uses sampling technology to produce its piano sound. Specifically, it features:
- CFX Grand Piano Sample – A meticulously recorded sound from Yamaha’s flagship CFX concert grand piano.
- VRM Lite (Virtual Resonance Modeling Lite) – Adds some realistic acoustic resonance effects (though not as advanced as full VRM).
Tone & Character: Warm, Rich, and Classical
The Yamaha CFX sample is deep, warm, and resonant, making it a great choice for classical music and expressive playing. The bass frequencies are rich and full, while the high notes have a singing, clear tone.
✅ Best for:
- Classical music, expressive pieces
- Solo piano playing
- Players who want a realistic grand piano sound
❌ Limitations:
- Less dynamic range than Roland’s modeled sound
- May sound slightly “static” compared to a real grand piano (since it uses samples instead of modeling)
Roland F701: SuperNATURAL Piano Modeling
The Roland F701 uses a combination of sampling and modeling with its SuperNATURAL Piano Sound Engine. This approach allows for more dynamic variation and real-time sound changes depending on how you play.
Tone & Character: Bright, Expressive, and Dynamic
The Roland SuperNATURAL sound is brighter and more modern compared to Yamaha’s warmer, classical tone. It is more expressive, meaning:
- If you play softly, the sound is light and delicate.
- If you play hard, the sound becomes brighter and more powerful.
✅ Best for:
- Jazz, pop, contemporary music
- Expressive playing that requires a wide dynamic range
- Players who enjoy a brighter, more cutting tone
❌ Limitations:
- May sound too bright for classical purists
- Less “weight” in the lower registers compared to Yamaha’s deep bass
Resonance and Realism
In an acoustic piano, pressing the sustain pedal or playing certain notes affects how other strings vibrate, creating natural resonances. Digital pianos try to replicate this effect with string resonance, damper resonance, and key-off samples.
Yamaha YDP-165: VRM Lite (Virtual Resonance Modeling Lite)
- Simulates string resonance, but not as deeply as full VRM.
- Good reproduction of damper resonance (the effect of sustained notes blending together).
- Lacks individual key noise and full sympathetic resonance.
✅ Feels and sounds natural, but not as detailed as Roland’s modeling approach.
Roland F701: Full SuperNATURAL Resonance Modeling
- More detailed resonance modeling, meaning every note reacts dynamically based on how you play.
- Escapement simulation, adding a subtle “click” when playing softly (like a real grand piano).
- More advanced damper resonance than Yamaha’s VRM Lite.
✅ Winner in realism, especially for expressive, dynamic playing.
Polyphony (How Many Notes Can Play at Once?)
Polyphony determines how many notes can sound simultaneously. If a piano runs out of polyphony, older notes will be cut off.
- Yamaha YDP-165: 192-note polyphony
- Roland F701: 256-note polyphony
✅ Winner: Roland F701 (though 192 is still plenty for most players).
Additional Instrument Sounds
Aside from their main grand piano tones, both pianos offer extra instrument sounds, but Roland provides far more variety.
Yamaha YDP-165: 10 Total Sounds
- 3 Acoustic Pianos (CFX Grand, Mellow, Bright)
- 2 Electric Pianos
- 2 Organs
- Harpsichord, Strings, Vibraphone
✅ Simple selection, focused on quality over quantity.
Roland F701: 324 Total Sounds
- Multiple acoustic pianos (Classical, Jazz, Pop, Ballad)
- Wide selection of electric pianos
- Harpsichords, Strings, Choir, Synths, Pads, and more
- Drum kits and orchestral sounds
✅ Much more variety for creative musicians.
Which Piano is Better for Different Playing Styles?
| Playing Style | Best Choice | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Classical | Yamaha YDP-165 | Warm, deep grand piano sound, ideal for classical pieces. |
| Jazz | Roland F701 | Brighter tone and faster key action make it better for jazz. |
| Pop & Contemporary | Roland F701 | More expressive, dynamic tone with a modern sound. |
| Solo Piano Performance | Yamaha YDP-165 | Rich, full-bodied piano sound perfect for solo performances. |
| Composition & Arranging | Roland F701 | 324 voices and more features make it better for creativity. |
| Beginners | Either | Both offer high-quality piano sounds and feel. |
Final Verdict: Which One Has Better Sound?
🎵 Choose the Yamaha YDP-165 if:
✅ You want a warm, rich grand piano sound ideal for classical music.
✅ You prefer simpler, high-quality piano sounds rather than a huge variety.
🎵 Choose the Roland F701 if:
✅ You want a brighter, expressive piano sound that works well for pop, jazz, and contemporary music.
✅ You need more instrument voices for versatility.
Both pianos have excellent sound quality, but Yamaha is better for classical players, while Roland offers more expression and versatility. Your choice depends on your playing style and tone preference!
Speaker System
A great digital piano isn’t just about key action and sound quality—the speaker system plays a crucial role in delivering a rich, immersive playing experience. Even if a piano has high-quality samples or sophisticated sound modeling, a weak speaker system can make it sound flat, lifeless, or lacking in depth.
In this section, we’ll take a deep dive into the speaker systems of the Yamaha YDP-165 and the Roland F701, comparing:
- Speaker power and placement (how many watts and where they’re located)
- Sound projection and clarity (how well they fill a room)
- Bass response and overall depth (whether the sound feels full and resonant)
- Suitability for different playing environments (home practice, performances, etc.)
By the end, you’ll have a clear understanding of which piano’s speaker system best suits your needs.
Yamaha YDP-165: Powerful 40W Speaker System
The Yamaha YDP-165 is equipped with two powerful 20W speakers, giving it a total output of 40W. This is a significant advantage over many digital pianos in this price range, including the Roland F701.
Speaker Configuration & Placement
- Two speakers, 20W each
- Located under the keyboard, positioned to direct sound outward
- Uses Yamaha’s signature speaker design for a more natural acoustic projection
Sound Projection & Clarity
The 40W output makes the YDP-165 noticeably louder and fuller than the Roland F701. The wider frequency range allows for a deep, resonant bass and crisp, clear treble tones. The piano sounds rich and powerful, even at low volume levels.
Bass Response & Depth
One of the standout features of the Yamaha YDP-165’s speakers is its strong bass presence. Since Yamaha’s CFX Grand Piano sample has a naturally deep, warm tone, the extra power from the speakers ensures that the bass frequencies don’t get lost.
✅ Pros of Yamaha YDP-165’s Speaker System:
✔ More powerful (40W vs. Roland’s 24W)
✔ Fuller, richer sound with stronger bass response
✔ Better for larger rooms or spaces
❌ Cons:
✖ Sound can sometimes feel a bit “contained” due to downward-facing speakers
✖ At very high volumes, slight distortion may occur
Roland F701: Balanced 24W Speaker System
The Roland F701 features two 12W speakers, for a total output of 24W. While this is less than the Yamaha’s 40W system, Roland’s advanced sound processing compensates for the lower power, ensuring clarity and balance across different volume levels.
Speaker Configuration & Placement
- Two speakers, 12W each
- Upward-facing design, positioned for better room-filling sound
- Optimized speaker placement for a balanced stereo image
Sound Projection & Clarity
Even though the Roland F701 has lower wattage, its speaker placement is more optimized for room projection. The upward-facing speakers distribute sound more evenly, making it feel spacious and natural.
The Roland’s SuperNATURAL modeling engine also helps create a clear and expressive tone, even at lower volumes. The higher frequencies remain bright and crisp, which is excellent for jazz, pop, or contemporary styles.
Bass Response & Depth
Since the Roland F701 is brighter in tone, its bass frequencies are not as deep or resonant as the Yamaha YDP-165. However, the balanced sound profile means that the piano never feels too “boomy” or muddy, which some players might actually prefer.
✅ Pros of Roland F701’s Speaker System:
✔ More balanced and evenly projected sound
✔ Better clarity at low volumes
✔ Optimized speaker placement for a natural feel
❌ Cons:
✖ Less power (24W vs. Yamaha’s 40W)
✖ Weaker bass response, less depth in low-end frequencies
✖ May lack fullness in larger rooms without external amplification
Comparing Speaker Systems Side-by-Side
| Feature | Yamaha YDP-165 | Roland F701 |
|---|---|---|
| Total Power Output | 40W (2 x 20W) | 24W (2 x 12W) |
| Speaker Placement | Downward-facing | Upward-facing |
| Sound Projection | Deep, powerful, strong bass | Balanced, clear, spacious |
| Best for | Larger rooms, classical music, full-bodied sound | Smaller spaces, pop/jazz, even sound distribution |
Suitability for Different Playing Environments
Yamaha YDP-165 – Best for Large Rooms & Classical Music
The extra power and bass depth make the YDP-165 a better choice if you:
✅ Want a rich, powerful piano sound that can fill a room
✅ Play classical music and need deep, resonant bass
✅ Don’t plan to use external speakers and want the best built-in audio
Roland F701 – Best for Small Spaces & Versatile Playing
The balanced and well-projected sound makes the F701 a great choice if you:
✅ Need a piano for a smaller room or apartment
✅ Play jazz, pop, or lighter styles that don’t require deep bass
✅ Prefer a more neutral, evenly spread sound
What If You Use External Speakers or Headphones?
If you mostly play with headphones, the built-in speaker system won’t matter as much since you’ll be hearing the direct sound from the piano’s processing engine.
- Yamaha YDP-165: Sounds fantastic through headphones, especially with CFX binaural sampling, which creates a realistic “in-room” feel.
- Roland F701: Also great through headphones, with immersive 3D sound processing that enhances the spatial feel.
However, if you plan to use external speakers or an amplifier, the Yamaha’s more powerful signal output will allow for a stronger sound, though both pianos offer decent output capabilities.
Final Verdict: Which One Has the Better Speaker System?
🥇 Choose the Yamaha YDP-165 if:
✅ You want a powerful, full-bodied sound that fills the room.
✅ You play classical or solo piano music that requires deep bass and resonance.
✅ You prefer a richer, more immersive tone at all volume levels.
🥇 Choose the Roland F701 if:
✅ You want a balanced, modern sound that works well for pop, jazz, and contemporary styles.
✅ You play in a small space or apartment and don’t need heavy bass.
✅ You prefer a more evenly distributed sound projection.
Bottom Line:
- If power and depth matter, Yamaha’s 40W system wins.
- If you prefer clarity and balanced projection, Roland’s F701 does a great job.
Your choice depends on whether you prioritize raw power or a more balanced, even sound!
Functions & Features
When comparing digital pianos, the functions and features can make a significant difference in how enjoyable and versatile the instrument is. While the Yamaha YDP-165 and Roland F701 are primarily designed as home digital pianos with a focus on realistic piano playing, they still come equipped with various built-in functions that enhance the playing experience.
In this in-depth analysis, we’ll compare their:
- Available instrument sounds (beyond the default piano)
- Built-in effects (reverb, chorus, brilliance, etc.)
- Recording & playback capabilities
- Metronome, layering, and split functions
- User interface & controls
- Additional smart features like app integration
By the end of this section, you’ll have a clear understanding of which digital piano offers more functionality for your specific needs.
1. Available Instrument Sounds
While both digital pianos focus on high-quality acoustic piano sounds, they also include other instrument voices to provide variety.
🎹 Yamaha YDP-165: 10 Total Voices
Yamaha keeps things simple and focused by including only 10 instrument sounds:
- 3 Acoustic Pianos (CFX Grand, Mellow, Bright)
- 2 Electric Pianos (Classic 80s-style EPs)
- 2 Organs (Church & Jazz)
- Harpsichord
- Strings
- Vibraphone
Overall Sound Approach: Yamaha emphasizes quality over quantity, ensuring that each instrument sounds realistic and well-sampled. The string and organ sounds are decent, but they’re not as detailed as Yamaha’s higher-end Clavinova models.
✅ Best for: Players who only need a few high-quality voices and don’t need a huge sound library.
🎹 Roland F701: 324 Total Voices
The Roland F701 takes a different approach—it provides a huge variety of instrument voices, making it much more versatile than the Yamaha.
The 324 sounds include:
- Multiple grand pianos (Concert, Bright, Ballad, Jazz)
- Electric pianos (Classic Rhodes, FM Synth EPs)
- Organs (Jazz, Church, Rock)
- Harpsichords, Clavinets
- Strings, Choirs, Synth Pads
- Guitars, Basses, and even Drum Kits
Overall Sound Approach: Roland gives you tons of variety, making this a better option for musicians who like to experiment with different tones beyond just piano.
✅ Best for: Players who want more sound variety for composing, experimenting, or layering different instruments.
🏆 Winner (Instrument Sounds): Roland F701
The Yamaha YDP-165 is great for a pure piano experience, but the Roland F701 wins for those who want more instrument choices.
2. Built-in Effects & Sound Customization
Adding effects like reverb, chorus, and brightness adjustments can make the piano sound more immersive and expressive. Let’s see how the two models compare.
🎛 Yamaha YDP-165: Simple, Focused Effects
- 4 Reverb Types (Room, Hall 1, Hall 2, Stage)
- Brilliance Adjustment (makes the sound darker or brighter)
- No chorus or modulation effects
✅ The reverb sounds natural, and the brilliance setting helps customize the tone slightly.
❌ Lacks deeper sound customization (no chorus, EQ, or advanced settings).
🎛 Roland F701: More Advanced Effects
- Ambience (Reverb) Control – Simulates playing in different spaces.
- Brilliance Adjustment – Similar to Yamaha’s.
- Chorus & Modulation Effects – Adds warmth and movement to the sound.
✅ More effects for tone shaping, making it better for players who want control over their sound.
🏆 Winner (Effects & Customization): Roland F701
Roland offers more sound-shaping tools, making it the better choice for those who like to experiment.
3. Recording & Playback Features
Both digital pianos allow you to record and playback performances, but they differ in their capabilities.
🎤 Yamaha YDP-165: Simple 2-Track Recorder
- Allows you to record two tracks (left hand & right hand separately).
- Playback is limited to internal memory only (no USB or external audio saving).
✅ Best for basic practice recordings.
❌ Cannot export recordings to USB.
🎤 Roland F701: More Recording & Playback Options
- MIDI Recording (like Yamaha)
- Audio Recording to USB (save performances as WAV files)
✅ Better for musicians who want to save their performances for later use.
❌ Still limited compared to high-end models, but better than Yamaha.
🏆 Winner (Recording & Playback): Roland F701
Roland’s ability to record and export audio files makes it the better choice for those who want to share or edit recordings.
4. Practice & Performance Features
📏 Yamaha YDP-165: Basic but Useful Features
- Metronome – Helps with rhythm training.
- Transpose Function – Shift the key up or down.
- Layer Mode – Play two sounds together (e.g., piano + strings).
- Duo Mode – Splits the keyboard for student-teacher duets.
✅ Great for beginners and students.
❌ Lacks a split function (where left and right hands can play different instrument sounds).
📏 Roland F701: More Versatile Practice Tools
- Metronome & Transpose (same as Yamaha).
- Layer Mode – Same as Yamaha.
- Split Mode – Allows playing two different instrument sounds on left & right hands.
- Twin Piano Mode – Similar to Yamaha’s Duo Mode, but with more control over tuning and output.
✅ More flexibility for different playing situations.
🏆 Winner (Practice & Performance Features): Roland F701
Both pianos have essential features, but Roland offers more flexibility for layering and splitting sounds.
5. User Interface & Controls
A good user interface makes navigating the piano’s features easy and intuitive.
🎛 Yamaha YDP-165: Traditional Button-Based Interface
- Minimalist design (few buttons, requires key combinations).
- No screen, so you must remember function key combinations.
✅ Simple and elegant, but not very user-friendly for deep customization.
🎛 Roland F701: Modern Screen & Navigation
- Small OLED display shows settings and adjustments.
- Buttons and dial for easy navigation.
✅ Much easier to use, especially for adjusting settings.
🏆 Winner (User Interface): Roland F701
Roland’s small display and better controls make it much easier to navigate and adjust settings.
Final Verdict: Which Piano Offers Better Features?
🎹 Choose the Yamaha YDP-165 if:
✅ You want a simple, distraction-free digital piano.
✅ You only need basic functions for classical or solo piano playing.
✅ You prefer a traditional, button-based interface.
🎹 Choose the Roland F701 if:
✅ You want more instrument sounds (324 vs. Yamaha’s 10).
✅ You need more recording and playback options.
✅ You like customizing your sound with effects & layering tools.
✅ You prefer a modern interface with a screen.
🏆 Overall Winner: Roland F701
While both pianos are great for serious piano players, the Roland F701 offers more features, making it more versatile for different styles of music.
Connectivity
In today’s world, digital pianos are more than just instruments—they are powerful tools for learning, recording, composing, and even performing. The ability to connect to external devices, such as computers, smartphones, and tablets, can significantly enhance a piano’s versatility.
Both the Yamaha YDP-165 and Roland F701 offer various connectivity options, but they take slightly different approaches in terms of Bluetooth, USB functionality, app integration, and external audio connections.
In this detailed connectivity comparison, we’ll cover:
- USB and MIDI connectivity (for connecting to computers and DAWs)
- Bluetooth functionality (audio streaming & MIDI control)
- Headphone and external audio output options
- Compatibility with music learning and control apps
- Overall ease of integration with modern devices
By the end of this section, you’ll have a clear idea of which piano offers better connectivity features based on your needs.
1. USB & MIDI Connectivity
One of the most essential features for modern musicians is USB and MIDI connectivity, which allows you to:
✅ Record your performances into music software (DAWs like GarageBand, Ableton, FL Studio, etc.)
✅ Use virtual instruments and sound libraries on a computer
✅ Connect to music learning apps for interactive lessons
🔌 Yamaha YDP-165: Basic USB-MIDI Functionality
The Yamaha YDP-165 includes:
- USB to Host (Type B) – Allows connection to a computer for MIDI communication.
- No USB Audio Interface – Only transmits MIDI data, not actual audio.
- Requires an adapter to connect to iPads or smartphones.
✅ Good for basic MIDI use, but lacks direct audio recording via USB.
🔌 Roland F701: USB-MIDI & USB Audio Interface
The Roland F701 provides:
- USB to Host (Type B) – Same as Yamaha for MIDI communication.
- USB Audio Interface – Can send both MIDI and actual audio to a computer via USB.
- Plug-and-play support for recording directly into DAWs.
✅ Better for recording and producing music, as it eliminates the need for an external audio interface.
🏆 Winner (USB & MIDI Connectivity): Roland F701
Roland’s built-in USB Audio Interface makes it more convenient for recording and digital music production.
2. Bluetooth Connectivity
Bluetooth has become an increasingly important feature for digital pianos, allowing for wireless MIDI control and audio streaming. However, not all pianos handle Bluetooth the same way.
📶 Yamaha YDP-165: Limited Bluetooth Availability
- Bluetooth Audio ONLY (Not available in all regions).
- No Bluetooth MIDI – Cannot be used for wireless app control or DAW recording.
✅ If your model includes Bluetooth, you can stream music to the piano’s speakers.
❌ Cannot use Bluetooth for MIDI or interactive apps.
📶 Roland F701: Full Bluetooth MIDI & Audio
- Bluetooth MIDI – Allows wireless control of apps like GarageBand, Flowkey, and Synthesia.
- Bluetooth Audio – Stream music wirelessly through the piano’s speakers.
✅ More advanced and flexible – can be used for both wireless playing and learning apps.
🏆 Winner (Bluetooth Connectivity): Roland F701
Roland provides both Bluetooth MIDI and Audio, making it far more versatile.
3. Headphone & External Audio Output Options
Using headphones or external speakers is essential for silent practice or amplifying your performance.
🎧 Yamaha YDP-165: Dual Headphone Jacks, No Line Out
- Two standard 1/4” headphone jacks for silent practice.
- No dedicated Line Out – Cannot connect easily to an external amplifier or speakers.
- Requires a workaround (using the headphone jack for external audio output).
✅ Great for silent practice, but less ideal for performances or studio setups.
🎧 Roland F701: Dual Headphone Jacks & Line Out Support
- Two headphone jacks (1/4” and 1/8” sizes) – Compatible with more types of headphones.
- Stereo Line Out (1/4” jacks) – Can easily connect to an amplifier or external speakers.
✅ Better suited for performances and external speaker setups.
🏆 Winner (Headphone & Audio Output): Roland F701
The inclusion of dedicated Line Out jacks gives Roland an advantage for those who plan to use external speakers.
4. Compatibility with Learning & Control Apps
Many digital pianos are now designed to work with interactive learning apps and piano control apps that enhance the experience for students and casual players.
📱 Yamaha YDP-165: Smart Pianist App
Yamaha offers Smart Pianist, which:
✅ Allows you to control the piano’s settings from your smartphone/tablet.
✅ Has a Chord Recognition feature that analyzes songs from your music library.
❌ No Bluetooth MIDI support, so you must connect via a USB cable.
📱 Roland F701: Piano Every Day App
Roland’s Piano Every Day app provides:
✅ Wireless control over piano functions using Bluetooth MIDI.
✅ Interactive learning tools, including sheet music and practice features.
✅ Easier to use due to Bluetooth MIDI, making it a better choice for app-based learning.
🏆 Winner (App Integration & Learning Tools): Roland F701
The wireless connectivity makes Roland’s Piano Every Day app more user-friendly.
5. Overall Ease of Integration with Modern Devices
When considering how well these pianos fit into a modern tech environment, the Roland F701 is clearly more versatile and future-proof.
| Feature | Yamaha YDP-165 | Roland F701 |
|---|---|---|
| USB MIDI | Yes | Yes |
| USB Audio Interface | ❌ No | ✅ Yes |
| Bluetooth Audio | ⚠️ Limited Availability | ✅ Yes |
| Bluetooth MIDI | ❌ No | ✅ Yes |
| Headphone Jacks | 2 (1/4” only) | 2 (1/4” + 1/8”) |
| Line Out for External Speakers | ❌ No | ✅ Yes |
| App Compatibility | Smart Pianist (wired only) | Piano Every Day (Bluetooth) |
✅ Yamaha YDP-165 is great if you only need basic USB MIDI and don’t mind using cables.
✅ Roland F701 is better if you want modern connectivity features, including wireless control, USB Audio, and line output options.
Final Verdict: Which Piano Has Better Connectivity?
🎹 Choose the Yamaha YDP-165 if:
✅ You only need basic USB MIDI connectivity.
✅ You don’t require Bluetooth MIDI or external audio connections.
✅ You prefer a simple, traditional setup without advanced tech features.
🎹 Choose the Roland F701 if:
✅ You want full Bluetooth functionality (MIDI + Audio) for wireless app control and music streaming.
✅ You need a USB Audio Interface for recording without extra equipment.
✅ You plan to use external speakers or amplifiers via dedicated Line Out jacks.
🏆 Overall Winner: Roland F701
Roland offers superior connectivity, making it the better choice for tech-savvy musicians, students using learning apps, and those who record music digitally.
Value for Money
When investing in a digital piano, price alone doesn’t tell the full story—it’s about what you’re getting for the money you spend. The Yamaha YDP-165 and Roland F701 are both mid-range home digital pianos, typically priced between $1,300 and $1,700, depending on location, color, and promotional discounts.
But which one offers the best value? In this section, we’ll analyze:
- Build quality vs. price (does it feel premium for what you pay?)
- Key action vs. cost (is the key feel worth the price tag?)
- Sound quality and speaker system vs. competitors
- Features and connectivity in relation to price
- Who gets more value from each piano?
1. Build Quality vs. Price
Both pianos are well-built, but they have different design philosophies.
- Yamaha YDP-165: Feels more solid and premium due to its heavier, traditional upright piano-like build. However, it is bulkier, which may be an issue for those in smaller spaces.
- Roland F701: More modern and minimalistic, with a slim profile and lighter weight. It doesn’t feel quite as substantial as the Yamaha, but it’s well-built for its design approach.
✅ Best for classic piano feel: Yamaha YDP-165
✅ Best for modern and compact spaces: Roland F701
2. Key Action vs. Cost
Since key feel is one of the most important factors in a digital piano, let’s break down the value of each piano’s key action.
- Yamaha YDP-165 (GH3 action): Feels more like an acoustic piano due to its heavier Graded Hammer 3 (GH3) action. This makes it great for classical players but may feel slightly too heavy for some.
- Roland F701 (PHA-4 Standard action): Offers a lighter, faster key response. Escapement simulation makes it more expressive, which is better for jazz, pop, and contemporary styles.
✅ Best for those who want realistic acoustic piano weight: Yamaha YDP-165
✅ Best for versatility and expressive playability: Roland F701
For the price, both key actions feel high quality, but your preference will depend on whether you prefer a heavier or lighter key action.
3. Sound Quality & Speaker System vs. Cost
Sound is another major factor in the value equation.
- Yamaha YDP-165: Uses CFX Grand Piano sampling, with a warmer, more classical tone. The 40W speakers are stronger than Roland’s, making it better for larger spaces.
- Roland F701: Uses SuperNATURAL Piano modeling, with a brighter, more expressive tone. The 24W speakers are weaker than Yamaha’s, but sound processing is more refined.
✅ Best for power and classical tone: Yamaha YDP-165
✅ Best for expressiveness and versatility: Roland F701
Considering the price, Yamaha delivers better built-in speaker power, while Roland offers a more expressive, dynamic sound engine.
4. Features & Connectivity in Relation to Price
Which piano gives more features for the money?
- Yamaha YDP-165: More traditional, with fewer features. No Bluetooth MIDI, no USB Audio, and only 10 instrument sounds.
- Roland F701: More features for the same price—Bluetooth MIDI & Audio, USB Audio Interface, 324 instrument sounds, and a screen for easier navigation.
✅ Best for those who want high-tech features: Roland F701
✅ Best for those who just want a great piano feel and sound: Yamaha YDP-165
For the same price range, Roland provides more modern features, while Yamaha keeps it simple and focused on piano realism.
5. Who Gets More Value from Each Piano?
| Buyer Type | Best Choice | Why? |
|---|---|---|
| Traditional Pianists | Yamaha YDP-165 | Better key weight and classical sound. |
| Modern, Tech-Savvy Musicians | Roland F701 | More features, Bluetooth, USB Audio. |
| Beginners | Roland F701 | Lighter keys, better app integration for learning. |
| Serious Classical Players | Yamaha YDP-165 | Closer to an acoustic piano in feel and sound. |
| Apartment Owners | Roland F701 | Compact design, Bluetooth headphones support. |
| People Who Need Loud Built-in Speakers | Yamaha YDP-165 | 40W speakers vs. Roland’s 24W. |
Final Verdict: Which One is the Better Value?
🎹 Choose the Yamaha YDP-165 if:
✅ You want a traditional digital piano with a realistic, heavy key feel.
✅ You prefer a deep, warm, classical piano sound.
✅ You need powerful built-in speakers for playing without external amplification.
🎹 Choose the Roland F701 if:
✅ You want more features for the same price (Bluetooth, USB Audio, more sounds).
✅ You play a variety of styles (classical, jazz, pop) and need a more expressive tone.
✅ You like a compact, modern design that fits well in smaller spaces.
🏆 Overall Winner for Value for Money: Roland F701
While both pianos are excellent choices, the Roland F701 offers more features for the same price, making it the better value for most players. However, if you prioritize a traditional piano experience, the Yamaha YDP-165 still holds strong value for classical musicians.
Final Verdict: Which Piano Should You Buy?
After thoroughly analyzing the Yamaha YDP-165 and the Roland F701 in terms of design, key action, sound quality, speaker system, features, connectivity, and value for money, it’s clear that both are excellent mid-range digital pianos. However, they cater to different types of players.
✅ Choose the Yamaha YDP-165 if:
🎵 You want a traditional digital piano experience with a realistic acoustic feel.
🎵 You play classical music and prefer a warm, rich tone (CFX Grand Piano sample).
🎵 You need strong built-in speakers (40W) for a full, room-filling sound.
🎵 You prefer a heavy, graded hammer action that mimics a real upright piano.
🎵 You value a sturdy, classic design that looks like an acoustic upright.
✅ Choose the Roland F701 if:
🎵 You want modern features (Bluetooth MIDI & Audio, USB Audio Interface, a screen for navigation).
🎵 You play a variety of music styles and want a brighter, more expressive piano tone.
🎵 You prefer a lighter, faster key action that’s great for jazz, pop, and contemporary music.
🎵 You need a compact, space-saving design that fits well in small apartments.
🎵 You want more instrument sounds (324 vs. Yamaha’s 10) for creativity and experimentation.
🏆 Overall Winner: Roland F701 (for most users)
The Roland F701 offers more features, better connectivity, and a more versatile playing experience for the same price. However, if you prioritize an authentic acoustic feel and a more powerful speaker system, the Yamaha YDP-165 is still an excellent choice for classical players. Ultimately, the best choice depends on your personal playing style and needs! 🎹